-
Posts
7,068 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Dr. Who
-
I'm going to offer an egghead opinion that may seem risible in the context of a football discussion board. Nonetheless, Plato pointed out the way excellence tends to drift towards decadent imitation over time. It's sad that criteria lowers and becomes democratized when it comes to matters of elite excellence, but it's also nearly unavoidable as the testimony of millennia of generations and multiple civilizations attest.
-
I am not like any of those irrational types. If I change a shirt during a game or stop watching for a bit, it's not that I think my behavior has any effect on the game, it's just that I like to change my sartorial vibe several times a day on occasion, etc.
-
Good Night / Bad Night - Pre-season game 1
Dr. Who replied to GunnerBill's topic in The Stadium Wall
GB gives a thorough, interesting write up and you give a thumbs down because of a quibble about Moss. Totally lacking in class, without even touching the matter of intellect. -
I was four years old. I'm still mad about it.
-
A rendering of OBJ signing.
-
That's a good point, though Beasley was vocal about it in a way that became controversial. I think the main reason is he got old, regressed a bit, and we had better options for the money at slot. I don't blame a fella for creating a narrative that preserves his sense of self-worth, though. I wish him well, personally.
-
7 Bills players that are trending up and down (per Joe B)
Dr. Who replied to JohnNord's topic in The Stadium Wall
I have a hazy memory of reading that in the wake of the KC defensive debacle in the playoffs, it was determined that we needed a cb with greater athleticism, speed, and the capacity to play man. The fellas we had out there when White went down could only handle very limited scheme specific roles and it made our defense more predictable. If that recollection is correct, it implies cb was considered a need. The urgency for Elam may have been he was the last cb with a round one grade, though I am just speculating. -
Well, one does not want public outcry to dictate vigilante justice, but if greater sensitivity to predatory and deeply dishonorable behavior becomes commonly shared, even if not criminally prosecuted, what is one supposed to do? Point to prior inadequate precedent and say there is nothing to be done but follow that? Folks think a year is more just than six games. Prepare for a result closer to that. Genuinely sorry you have a terrible owner who habitually makes unwise decisions.
-
Not that any of this matters -- but I hold political and ethical views that are often dismissed and mocked (I am an eccentric, but more or less traditionalist Catholic.) I actually quit my job because my employer was requiring actions I deemed incompatible with my beliefs. I continue to suffer economic hardship because of that action. I'm not opposed to acting upon one's ethical sense of what is right, but there is a point at which one is asking for a degree of purity that is simply not to be discovered in this world. And it's rather insufferable when that demand coincides with implicit contempt for ordinary folk who only wish to continue a fellowship that goes back generations in some cases.
-
Alright, so, for the record, are you going to continue to participate in a message board that at least indirectly increases interest in and support for the NFL insofar as caring about a team in the league will ultimately redound to some aspect of economic well-being for the corporate entity? Will you buy any product with the Buffalo Bills on it? A cap, a scarf, a bumper sticker? What level of contamination is possible according to your personal kosher laws?
-
You're highjacking the entire thread to repeat simplistic moralizing. In a global, corporate world, there are countless situations where one is obliged to accept acting where sometimes grave evils are involved. Every time you buy a product from China, you're likely implicated in slave labor and at minimum, you support the economy of a regime with a terrible human rights record. Do you check that all the products you purchase have no connection to China? It's not even possible in some cases, because the supply chain for many products is dependent on outside sources. Every time one discovers an athelete who is criminal, acts badly towards women or children, etc., is one obliged to disown watching the sport? What level of purity is necessary for you to condone someone still caring about a team they may have been rooting for and following for decades? In this imperfect world, ethics is always messy, but taking away a source of communal bonding and sometimes joy for the sake of signaling superior moral integrity is bombastic LAMP reiterated over and over.
-
Training Camp practice 7/30 - The pads come on
Dr. Who replied to YoloinOhio's topic in The Stadium Wall
I don't know, but apparently we are stuck with his cap hit, so if it's pretty much a wash, Howard is making the team. -
Mega Millions this Friday - $1,100,000,000
Dr. Who replied to \GoBillsInDallas/'s topic in Off the Wall
Keep them in Foxboro and trade away all their good players for scrubs. -
You know Muppy is going to put you on ignore now . . .