Max Fischer

That headline should get your privileges revoked.

It would have been easier if you just agreed with my original post.

If some random account posts something that reliable sources have not, that's the first red flag. Then you go from there. Not that difficult, so I'm not sure why you're so riled up about it.

It will take two minutes for you to verify that there is no credible source for a "law enforcement raid." That was made up. The same goes for the McLauren quote on another thread. It's made up.

The unfounded rumors circulated on here are worse than high school. It only takes a few minutes to look up credible sources.

I'm betting this is just a troll, but I'll still say, I'm a huge believer in Josh Allen, but he shares the most blame for the loss. If he played just OK, the Bills could have won.

Pine Street off 2nd.

This is a good list. Only one thing to add: The Sprinkle Cone has very good ice cream

Week 1 narratives might not last past Week 2, let alone Week 16.

I haven't watched a pre or post-game show in years. I find the availability of content so ubiquitous that it makes the pre-game shows irrelevant.

Yes, during tonight's game, Josh will be too distracted by the commercials he made in the Spring. No doubt he's rehearsing lines rather than studying tape.

I agree. Nothing will hold back a Super Bowl more than Josh appearing in commercials.

Overall: very good. Split screen was the way to go, especially with Red Zone. One option I hope they include is the ability to build your own split screens.

If he wasn't, Klein or Dodson would start.

Yet at the same time, many fans on this thread have concluded that Bernard cannot be a good MLB because of his size. His size "could" be a factor, but we won't know that until he's played a few games. Who knows, perhaps instinct, technique, and athleticism will win out.

It's NOT optimism, it's let's see how he plays a game or two before you call him a bust. This rush to condemn a player who has a decent pedigree is just so weird.

I can't tell if this is a troll job but just in case . . . 45 plays is 15-30 less than an average full game of defensive snaps. Moreover, he took those snaps over their first seven games, which is not an adequate measure of a player's ability. As for your college analysis, it seems you forgot to mention he was a team captain, twice second-team Big 12, once first-team Big 12, and MVP of the Sugar Bowl.

The key point here is we don't know anything until Bernard's snap count is large enough to make a rational evaluation. Too many here seem to have prejudged Bernard before he's had any significant playing time. However, when so many fans disliked to hated Edmunds, there's little reason to believe there'll ever be any kind of consensus.

Milano doesn't play Middle Linebacker because of size, it's because of temperament and skillset. Nearly every decent Bills expert says that Milano doesn't have the personality for MLB and the team would never force him to play out of his natural WLB. As for size, a player 6% lighter can easily be a better tackler than those bigger than him. As for whether Bernard WILL be a good linebacker has yet to be determined, but it won't be due soley to his size (or supposed lack of it).

So your "evidence" is a picture on the internet where the players are not standing next to each other, but you're quick to dismiss the measurables reported on team official websites? Good one.

It's amusing that some have disagreed and disliked this comment when it's just a simple fact.

Bernard is not undersized. He's bigger than Milano and slightly lighter than Roquan Smith.

Panic much?

If everyone plays well, then the Bills don't require another "Superstar."

That game was a highlight of the previous seventeen years.