Max Fischer

Well, maybe, but I'd like to see evidence other than a Seahawk hype video. The Bills could do the same for Keon.

I like Shaheed, and he may have been an upgrade, but I'm not sure he was worth a 4th and 5th as a rental. It's pretty steep, especially if he isn't a proven difference-maker.

The Jets did very well, but let's not forget that Williams is excellent, and it's a long shot that they will select or sign someone 70% as good. Gardner appears to have regressed somewhat, but he might still be among the top 15%-20% of all cornerbacks, and he'll need to be replaced with a draft pick or a signing. This is a good trade for picks and clearing salary, but the Jets have a LOT of holes to fill, including QB, and the grade on these moves may not be known for a few years.

I don't think the Bills make a big trade, but if they do, I'm guessing Maliek Collins - DT Browns

Thanks, we needed another thread. 🙂

That's a steep price.

The NFL is a multi-billion-dollar enterprise where by players are valued contractual commodities as well as individually incentivized businessmen. It's remarkable to believe that neither the team or the players “understand their bodies” - it's simply absurd. Flexibility and stretching? My God, how come no one has thought of that? Forget the tens of millions spent to keep the players healthy when all they needed to do was read this board.

I don't know the answer but I think it's probable that there is no significant difference in conditioning across the league. You would have to demonstrate that somehow the Chiefs are X% less likely to hurt because of Y. That Y factor would NOT be a secret as players and coaches coming off and on the team would be able to articulate whatever that is. So far, there is nothing to suggest that factor exists. Perhaps adding to the evidence is this year’s rash of Chiefs injuries; yet no one is pointing to any changes that would play a role. With the margins of victory so small, sometimes it's just luck. Like an injury at a position of strength rather where a team is most vulnerable. Like the Bills at LB and CB when they met in the playoffs. It's not an excuse but it's also a factor.

In my opinion, there are far too many factors to determine a trend with any degree of certainty. It's much more likely that the difference in injuries between teams is due to random probability, and pinpointing the reason is down to an unprovable guess. Adding: That's why it's so improbable that teams like the Chiefs have gone to the AFC Championship year after year. Yes, they are outstanding, but they have also benefited from a relatively healthy team and the misfortune of their opponents (see key Bills injuries). The same applies to the Bills' four-year Super Bowl run, and the opposite holds for the Patriots missing Brady for a year (when they could have won the Super Bowl that year as well).

This is dumb. Last year the Bills and Ravens were among the least affected by injuries and this year, among the most. You know why? Players get hurt. There is often nothing you can do about it. That why it's a random factor.

My hypothesis: Due to injuries, the Bills might have had many different combinations of players who have not worked together -- perhaps not even in practice. One consequence of so many defensive injuries is communication and understanding their individual roles when different combinations are on the field. This might not be the cause of the timeouts but it could have been a factor. Jeez. Coaching is there reason the Bills won. The Chiefs are much more talented up and down the roster and it was the coaching schemes that put in Bills in position to be a play or two from a blowout win.

If the passing attack showed anything after the bye I would be much more optimistic. I would be fine overpaying for a top receiver who could beat man-to-man because I confident that would loosen up the coverages and get things rolling. Sounds simple but that might be enough.

The Bills have scored 41, 30, 31 and 31 points. Josh is having another MVP-caliber season. I think the passing game looks great.

Manning in the 4th Round? 🙂

This crew instinctively booked their tickets to the Carolina game.

Understandably, Daboll may not cut it as a Head Coach, but I'm more surprised that Joe Schoen has constructed such an awful roster. He's had enough high picks to hit on a few players, but the whole plan is a mess. They got saddled with Daniel Jones and his contract, but Jones has demonstrated that perhaps he wasn't the problem after all.

More like two quarters. The opening game, the Ravens were shellacking the Bills with Peterman's 0.0 QB rating. Allen came in and never relinquished the starting job. Peterman might be the worst QB ever to start a Bills game. And that is saying a lot.

Bills benefit either way. I like the idea of the Chiefs winning because I don't want the Ravens to win their division and potentially have a slightly easier schedule. Meanwhile, the Chargers would already have a 2.5-game lead on the Chiefs, who still have to face the Bills, Broncos twice, and the Chargers. However, there are plausible scenarios that each team will make the playoffs and possibly win their division.

National Review seeks Congressional investigation. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/what-to-make-of-the-tom-homan-bribery-allegation/

Like clockwork. MAGA will endorse anything Trump does, no matter how ludicrous. If a Democrat did it Fox News and Fox Business would scream 24 hours a day and MAGA would scream right along.

President Trump is imposing a $100,000 fee to obtain an H‑1B visa, the primary visa for skilled foreign workers. To be clear, this $100,000 fee is in addition to the salary, lawyer fees, and other costs of hiring an H‑1B worker. This fee would effectively end the H‑1B visa category by making it prohibitive for most businesses to hire H‑1B workers. This would force leading technology companies out of the United States, reduce demand for US workers, reduce innovation, have severe second-order economic effects, and lower the supply of goods and services in everything from IT and education to manufacturing and medicine. President Trump also banned new H‑1B workers in a similar presidential proclamation in June 2020, claiming that they hurt US workers during the pandemic-induced economic crisis. Fortunately, a court found in October 2020 that the action was illegal, and the statutory authority did not exist for the president to rewrite US immigration law to micromanage the US labor market. This helped businesses retain jobs during the pandemic as IT workers aided the shift to remote work. Adjusting the H‑1B visa fee, which is established by regulation, would require a notice and comment rulemaking, not a presidential proclamation. Even so, except for specific statutory fees, the only basis for the government to issue fees is to recover costs of adjudicating applications. Trump’s $100,000 fee has no statutory basis for fees. Given the vague authorities in immigration law, however, there is some reason for concern that the courts would uphold this action. The president is also planning to mandate an increase in the prevailing wage, or mandatory minimum wage, for H‑1B workers, which is another action that his administration attempted in 2020. In that case, the Department of Labor did attempt to issue a formal regulation for this in 2020. That rule contained many factual and legal errors that I identified at the time, and was also blocked for failing to abide by the Administrative Procedure Act (as this current presidential proclamation is also failing to do). It was ultimately not implemented. Illegally distorting the prevailing wage would prevent even the most highly skilled H‑1B workers from being hired. That’s because the prevailing wage has four different levels depending on experience, skill, and management responsibilities for the job. The rule would have raised the wage so high that even senior managers with years of experience would have been priced out. President Trump’s reported plan to undermine the H‑1B visa is at odds with his remarks during the intra-conservative debate over the visa in December 2020, when he said, “I’ve always liked the visas. I have always been in favor of the visas. That’s why we have them. I’ve been a believer in H‑1B. I have used it many times. It’s a great program.” Perhaps someone should remind the president of his words on this and other immigration issues.

Just trying to be helpful. Here another that show that Trump will let Putin do whatever he wants: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-20/putin-decides-russia-can-step-up-ukraine-attacks-and-trump-won-t-act?embedded-checkout=true

https://www.statnews.com/2025/09/19/covid-19-vaccines-children-evidence-safety-protection-severe-disease/ https://www.statnews.com/2025/09/19/what-acip-meeting-says-about-vaccine-schedule-rfk-restoring-trust-vaccines/

Chris Christie, the erstwhile Trump ally and former governor who once served as U.S. attorney in New Jersey, said that decisions about criminal prosecutions should be made by people with the requisite résumé and training, and that Mr. Trump was “clearly not qualified” to make such decisions “in either respect.” “When the decisions are made by someone who has neither the education nor the experience to make those decisions, people immediately jump to the conclusion that they’re being made for reasons that have nothing to do with the law,” Mr. Christie said in a brief interview. “And that’s the type of slippery slope that we cannot have our criminal justice system go down.”