ndirish1978

1- Darnold 2- Mayfield 3- Rosen

Meh, your opinion isn't worth the pixels it takes up on my screen. FTR your statement about Indy is completely false, they already said they were open to trading back. I wouldn't expect you to state actual facts or employ logic though, why start now.

When did he say this, because what he is on record saying this week is that he is willing to trade back.

You're talking in circles. First, you say there is no way to know which QB will be picked, then you set up a scenario where no one will trade with us. Like I already said. If you are ok with any of the top 4, you have an obligation to try as hard as you can to trade into 4 or 5. If you only like 3 of the top 4, then you have to try and move up to 2 or 1 and give whatever it takes to get those picks. If you only liked 3 QBs are unable to trade to 2, then you shot yourself in the foot not offering more picks for #3 from a team that has already stated they're fine moving pack to collect more picks. You're setting up assumptions and knocking them down to make your point, there is absolutely zero evidence that the Bills couldn't have moved up to 3 by overpaying for that pick considering they have more draft capital than the Jets. In fact, by stating they'd like to move back yet again, the Colts have shown that you're assumption is wrong and that they never had a limit for how far back they were willing to go.

You're right, it's entirely possible they already screwed themselves by letting the Jests move up to 3.

Not pretty clear at all. If you're a GM and you base your moves off of ESPN "sources" you should be fired immediately.

That's why I just said, you have an obligation to trade up to a pick that will secure you one of the QBs you want. You cannot sit around and be reactive.

There is no chance they already know who the top 3 QBs being picked are. GMs at 1 and 2 won't even tell their HCs who they are picking. There is no way to know which of the top 4 is available after pick 4. I you like Rosen, Mayfield and Darnold you can't sit around and figure you can get that guy at 5 or later.

You simply cannot keep reiterating the fact that "this is a QB-driven league" and then stand pat while the top 3 QBs are taken off the board, especially when you have a division rival taking one of those guys. If Beane doesn't trade up he's signing his own pink slip. If you're acknowledging that QB is the most important position on the field you can't take the "sit at 12 and take who comes to us" position. I don't care if you overpay, the only excuse for not trading up is "we offered them the farm and they didn't want to trade." That may happen at 1-3, but there is no excuse not to trade up to 4-6 when you know there are several teams not in the top 10 looking for QBs.

Fun Fact - Yolo and 26 are responsible for 90% of the new poster threads here. Not saying they have dozens of alternate screen names, but I'm not saying they don't...

Calling Brown a journalist is calling someone who gets an honorary title a real doctor. The title exists in name only. Brown is a marketing/pr spokesman.

This would be wrong. Schrager actually has insight and doesn't just take uneducated dumps on the team like the rest of the national media.

Bleacher Report! What a bastion of football knowledge!

This would be a great way to sell zero tickets and never win another game.

I don't post there either - I have zero interest in drafting one of these 3rd tier QBs. If we're going to just spin and point at JAG players we may as well just go all-in on AJ, who at least has already played at a decent level as a pro.

How considerate of Nathan, now the ball will make it into the hands of the opposing team's defenders quicker

Well, because the poster actually contributed something to the board with his post unlike you did with yours. See how that works?

I'm starting to think this first-pick site is just pulling my leg ...

I gave an opinion, you can disagree but the dickish-ness in your tone is ridiculous.

Or perhaps because there are so few amazing MLBs?

Absolutely no rush to judgment. His first performance as a starter was HISTORICALLY bad. No one with that many interceptions in their first game has ever made themselves into a quality starter and he did it all in a single half. I don't have any confidence he's the guy to buck that trend.

MLB. They have the most opportunities to change the game on D. They can blitz and sack the QB, they can disrupt passes across the middle, they can completely shut down a running game.

Congratulations!

"Who thinks Thurmanator is burying some romantic feelings for Josh Rosen?"

Ugh, I hate bb.com livestreams, they never work for me. I have tried in 5 different browsers