-
Posts
5,443 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Stank_Nasty
-
ya. I don't have strong thoughts one way or the other..... just seem like classic underachievers... combination of the both of their flaws I would guess. I do wonder one thing...… when will all these top paid qb's start seeing what their contracts are doing to their teams and subsequently to their legacies? they are smart guys. I would think they could figure it out.
-
Where Are They Now? Safety Coy Wire
Stank_Nasty replied to The Avenger's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
my wife and I did something similar for Halloween this year.....I whored it up as Bell(chest hair and all) and she was The Beast..... we cleaned house at every costume contest we went to over the weekend. came away with like just under $700. ….. I only lasted in the heels about 15 minutes though. -
come on, gug.. that was 10 years ago.... are all super bowl winning coaches apparently locked into jobs for life?
-
Your favorite Bills conspiracy theory?
Stank_Nasty replied to major's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I’ve seen it. Thanks for proving my point. Have a nice day. -
Your favorite Bills conspiracy theory?
Stank_Nasty replied to major's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
And here we go..... this is gold! it was bosa mic’d Up and he was saying it in Jest. It was very clear mills was just being mills and had whiffed on a couple of assignments. -
Like Hughes a lot. Good player. Glad we have him.... but I have never seen such a cult following of the “pressures” stat than is on this board to somehow spin that Hughes is elite. Sorry. Just can’t get on board with that. Elite guys routinely get home for double digits year in and year out. ..... now cue the predictable remarks about how I just don’t understand the details of the game.
-
Your favorite Bills conspiracy theory?
Stank_Nasty replied to major's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
One of the dumbest..... The peterman gang swearing up and down the bills O-line let the chargers defense tee off on #2 as a statement to the coaches. -
Buffalo Bills: Back to Bojorquez
Stank_Nasty replied to LeGOATski's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Was I imagining things or didn’t crossman get fired earlier in the offseason because he was historically bad.... am I the only one that’s pointed this out so far? -
Well the silly part is that he acts as though it kept the bills from doing anything else they wanted to do. They friggin had 80. That’s honestly just really uninformed and stupid.
-
Somebody would have to have their head in the sand to not see a plan is clear. Whether it works or not is for a different debate. Doesnt it make you wonder how this dude is an Exec? Haha
-
Exactly. Dude is acting like 5 mil to Nsekhe formed our whole offseason. Makes me question how anyone who would say that is an exec.
-
I read this yesterday and just chuckled. It’s been so promising because of the fact that there’s a clear plan. That exec seems a bit clueless. The Nsekhe signing was been praised by almost everyone as a great and affordable under the radar signing and this schmuck is acting like it broke our bank. That’s foolish
-
well ya..... but it wasn't overlooked. they went out and signed cole Beasley. that's not exactly overlooking the short game. how would somebody deduce that they are overlooking the short/intermediate game when they just went out gave somebody a good chunk a change that happens to use that as his bread n' butter? the OP saying its been overlooked is another fabrication we can just stack onto the pile for him.
-
WR John Brown (Ravens) to the Bills
Stank_Nasty replied to blacklabel's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
i agree its slightly concerning but the way i look at it is we already had problems with drops, at least now we have a dude that can reward our young qb by making a play on those "area code" throws.... i'll admit i already posted this clip in this thread the day he was signed..... but i don't mind watching again! -
I see your point. I would just say that very good for that amount of time equates to great.
-
Again. You are weighing shorter term dominance more than consistency. I think they both have merit. 1350 scrimmage yds a year over 14 seasons while never having a HUGE year says to me the dude was consistently very good while not having just a couple years inflate his averages. 6-8 years of that may not be enough. But 12+? Ya. I’m good with it. And fwiw, which isn’t much, IMO in his prime he was a top 4-6 overall back in the nfl for a 3-5 year stretch when you factor in his receiving skills. Again. That alone isn’t enough but you add in all the other nice years and he’s in there IMO.