No matter what the rule- you’ll never have it truly consistent on the edges. Having 103 hi def slo mo views is what changed perceptions... but how do you write a rule that defines a catch without having a TON of moving parts and judgment in it?
It was a tight call. If that was a pat making the same play against us, we would likely see the board 99% the opposite direction — and neither way would be crazy.
I think thats why we heard the call stands instead of the call is confirmed
How did he feel about video on flowing sheets?
honestly I don’t care for a lot of his music but what he (and his team) just did was more impressive than most will give credit for
Yup- and it’s situational awareness with 40 seconds left. You kick and it’s a good chance the pats still get 3. You miss, odds are the half is over. So risk is minimal taking the shot
Dudes dug in and just flinging stuff to see what sticks in the argument. I’m not even sure he’s wrong but it seems he decided and is now trying to support it instead of the other way around
Im not a huuuge fan of the call most weeks but against a front 4 like this I’m not opposed to finding any way you can to make them think twice about trickery and misdirection
One might think ptr would want a shred of evidence before making multiple posts about it being the refs interfering
but maybe I’m wrong about the bar he can clear
Ive been on board with hoping this is the end of the road if they win. Plus, doc already said he’s quittung the nfl if they do.
the best of course being they traded jimmy like 2 months before brady retired if it happens...