About 99% of the time, referencing grammar when debating topics is a waste of time. They don’t learn whatever you’re attempting to teach, and you’re not really trying to be helpful. Why the passive-aggressive charade? Besides, if you understood enough of what was posted to disagree with it, the grammar was obviously sufficient. The 1% of the time it isn’t a waste of time if when the mistake is hilarious and takes over the thread.
The Fitz obsession after he left us to be another teams backup for less money still mystifies me. I’d be willing to bet there’s a Fitz specific thread every season since.
Replying “no” to a topic without any explanation used to irritate me. Now that I’m a father, I assume that it’s either a dad joke or pure nihilism. I also put “it’s only preseason” in the same category because not a substantive response. It’s like typing the time and date. We’re aware. Unless it’s followed by facts or, at least a theory, we have clocks and calendars for that.