All Activity

Lol, a few times a year, you and I are on opposite pages. It makes for good conversation and debate. 🍻 🤷🏻‍♂️

Sometimes good teams look at bad teams (2-7) Dolphins and think they are so bad that all we gotta do is show up and they will go into a fetal position. This is the NFL and even the bad teams have a shot at times. Not to mention that this was a division game and Buffalo has beaten them like a redheaded stepchild over the last few seasons. To Miami, this was their super bowl and big time revenge. The Dolphins wanted this more than life itself and some of the Bills players didn't put out the effort to win. Plus, they might have been looking past them at the Bucs. the Dolphins HC went trolling to a Bills bar after the game to rub it in. This game meant so much to them. We will see this week if that game was an anomaly or what the future holds. We Bills fans can only hope for the former!

Keon is definitely to blame if he's not coachable. I'm also going to point a finger at Beane, who drafted him when it was argued at the time he wasn't the right player the Bills needed, and also because they supposedly did their homework on this kid. I will say that if somehow Keon is able to turn it around and become a nice chess piece in this offense, I will gladly eat a hefty plate of crow, but time is ticking and the NFL doesn't wait long for players to mature and figure things out.

Keon is more worried about posting his stats on IG than actually producing. He does it after every game and it's freaking annoying. He makes an entire 'story' of his numbers. Like GREAT dude.. you scored. We lost by 17 and you put in a half-ass effort.

Rumors/speculation in the NYC area about Bill going to the Giants. He has history there and has always spoken highly of the organization. If he did become their next HC I wouldn't be surprised.

☝️ Works for Blackrock Capital...

Lawson, Reggie Ragland, and Adolphus Washington. Preston Brown played under Rex but was a Marrone draft pick. Ragland was going to play inside with Brown when they moved to a 3-4. I do remember it though. "We got three guys who can start coming off the bus." Lawson was never a 3-4 OLB but wasnt horrible. Washington was ok his first year but was never more than a rotational player. Ragland never started a down for the Bills in the regular season and was traded to surprise, Kansas City.

I think its likely because plays are never designed to actually go to him. He plays more snaps than kincaid and shakir, yet the entire passing offense has them as the primary reads on like every play. I look at it as a "get into the war" type of thing - you can't find rhythm or confidence when your job is clear outs and blocking. He probably wants to see the ball more - and that doesn't mean we should throw back shoulder throws on the sideline all game - it might be moving him across the formation from time to time. Just my 2 cents.

I would add another part to number 3. He’s referenced “trusting his feet” on a few occasions at pressers. He’s referring to his mechanics. Maybe he’s struggling with that part of his game. Ever since reporting to the Bills, his mechanics have been an ongoing project. It’s probably an exhausting experience mentally. I can relate to that issue with my golf swing. Maybe he’s struggling and needs a sports psychologist, although I’m thinking that may already be in place. I hope he finds what ever it is.

Belicheck and Daboll combo would be the best we can do. Josh best yrs were in the Ehardt Perkins system and Belicheck will get this defense to Superbowl caliber. BB knows the formula to winning it all he would be Josh Allen's Phil Jackson!

I mean to me, it's ok to be a little smug before the season starts. And it's really ok to be wrong from time to time. I would say being willing to give up multiple high draft picks at the deadline to get a WR is an admission of a mistake. I'm actually curious to see if this translates to the off-season and he makes some moves to redo the WR room.

Fits in with the JAG squad.

It is revolutionary in the sense that previous technology enabled enhancements to productivity resulting in workers being able to produce greater output then before. AI results in enhanced productivity while eliminating workers. The primary issue is all of the benefits of AI go to the owners of capital and all the costs and consequence go to labor. Millions will lose their jobs. The standard response from proponents of AI is the unemployed will work in "new" industries and jobs created as a result of AI without being able to articulate or speculate on what those new industries and jobs will be. Meanwhile, vast quantities of finite resources, water, natural gas, electricity, other materials are being allocated to this sector which will result in even greater costs to be borne by the have-nots. So far the focus has been to develop and deploy the technology as fast as possible and ignore any consequences to workers or society and civilization. The end goal being to produce an army of robot "slaves" to do the bidding of capitalists. Creating a class of 21st century slave owning plantations. A pretty dark vision for the future. I think it goes far beyond universal income. I'll speculate the party that seizes the high ground on the view that AI benefits and costs need to be managed and controlled and distributed equally for the good of all of society, not just wealthy tech moguls and their companies at the expense of everyone else will gain the upper hand winning a majority. Maybe as soon as 2026. My guess is the Democrats will embrace the issue as the Republicans are bit slow to catch on to the pulse of change going on here and generally this administration is adverse to taking on business interests.

I'll stick with Prater.

This rant looks so bad now. He knew he effed up and tried to double down. Time for a change

Beanie will kick the can down the road some more and sign some backups to 8-10 mil dollar deals. This his motto the last 3 yrs and he won't change it. He's worse then the guy he always criticizes for bad management Whaley.

Then he'll fit right in.

Exactly. To me he lost the fanbase with this because it was either going to be he was right so people had to shutup OR it fails badly making him look like a fool while also hurting the team in the process. As a GM you get criticized 24/7, for this to be the way you handled it was pathetic and then ignore the WR spot the way he did until it was too late was criminal as the GM of the team. He can go this offseason.

He struggled the last year and a half.

I agree with you, but there isn't a lot of longevity for guys who aren't great pocket passers. At some point the velocity will dip, the legs won't take you as far, etc. and you need to be a great pocket passer to be a productive NFL starter well into your 30's. I was a proponent of the franchise pushing him in that direction so that we could enjoy a productive 36 year old Josh Allen on the Buffalo Bills. The inverse to me was sort of what we are seeing with Dart or Cam Newton. But as he approaches 30 I think you just have to let the guy play his game, and if the wheels fall off at 33 then they fall off. That said, whenever I have a spicy take guys generally seem to immediately do the opposite (see Dane Jackson circa 2023). I also thought the Sabres were really on to something when the missed the playoffs by a point.

The look on Josh Allens face after he drops back to pass and nobody is open a majority of the time says it all to me. It's like he knows and has all but gave up because he don't have the players needed to win consistently

My apologies to Tanner Gentry.

Then the lenses are bound to be pink...🤨