Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. He’s not Henry but he’s a big part of our offense. He’s also 25 and plays every game. If Brady uses him in the last two drives against KC, we might have gone to the SB. You think nothing of paying Benford $20 million and he’s a concussion away from being in danger of losing his career. Since Thurman, how many game changing backs have we wasted high draft choices on who were either injury riddled and mediocre or head cases like Lynch. We can have Cook for 3 or four more years at reasonable rates compared to the increased price structure greatl RBs will be demanding after Barkley and Henry’s deal. It’s because of the threat of Cook that Josh has been so prolific.
  3. MAGAs don’t care, even if it directly impacts them negatively. Wtf? The guy is a snake charmer.
  4. I don't think we can glean a lot from schedules given how much things change between seasons & throughout the season. How many times have we seen "weak" or "tough" strength of schedules flipped on their head? Like going into the 2024 season, the Browns were an 11 win team boosting SoS, the 49ers were the NFC champs, and the Cowboys had 12 wins. They looked tough on paper, but then the 2024 season happened. Browns 3 - 14, 49ers 6 - 11, and Cowboys 7 - 10. On the opposite end, people with "easy" SoS had opponents the 5 win Chargers & 7 win Vikings, only for them to be actual good teams that finished 11-6 & 14-3. Does anyone think the Vikings will finish with 14 wins again? Doubtful. Now I know everything people are discussing isn't based on SoS. Prime time games, distance traveled, short weeks, etc. are all a factor. But there's way too many factors week to week to predict very far into the future. I remember when the Jags were coming off the divisional round loss to KC, people were saying they had the easiest possible layup for the 1 seed. They were expected to improve, their division was in the gutter, and they had an extremely weak schedule. Then CJ Stroud came along, they sucked, and now they're back to asking "do we have a franchise QB?" No Christmas or international games is good no matter how you look at it, so I'll call that a win. But when you take into account the random things that happen, injuries, suspensions, or even just bad luck with weather, the only thing I'll predict is 12 - 14 wins overall. Actually, there's one more thing that's for certain - the Bengals will lose a bunch of early games, slowly crawl their way out, then b*tch & moan that they missed the playoffs again 😊
  5. If it's being used for Official business and retired after he's out of Office (and the replacements are ready), it's not a personal gift.
  6. The AI/Allen Iverson bit has been done enough already - and it was barely funny the first time. But I do like that Allen and Beane (and others) are good with poking fun at themselves. Also decent of Iverson to do the bit.
  7. Yeah. Very odd on India's part. I don't care about the plane being given. If it's going to cost the taxpayers tons of money to upgrade/secure it, it's not worth it. And he shouldn't be able to use it after he's out of Office.
  8. What would make this truly awesome is if AI really didn’t have any context to it and if his perplexed response to it was genuine.
  9. You don't have a problem with this? Anticipating those questions, sources told ABC News that lawyers for the White House counsel's office and the Department of Justice drafted an analysis for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth concluding that is legal for the Department of Defense to accept the aircraft as a gift and later turn it over to the Trump library, and that it does not violate laws against bribery or the Constitution's prohibition (the emoluments clause) of any U.S. government official accepting gifts "from any King, Prince or foreign State." Trump administration poised to accept 'palace in the sky' as a gift for Trump from Qatar: Sources - ABC News Why is the administration so willing to sidestep Congress - the very body the Constitution says must approve foreign gifts?
  10. Me too, thought it was pretty lame.
  11. He had a good amount that I posted and I'm not the person you were talking to though People say we don't use him correctly.. but I don't think people understand how modern tight ends are used ... They say he only runs check Downs But he was 2nd in deep targets on the season Top 8 in yards per route ran 3rd in yards after catch per reception And he played hurt so you can expect more
  12. He was used as essentially another Offensive Lineman on the field. I wouldn't want Josh to be looking his way on anything but his last read.
  13. When the Secretary of Transportation is more focused on Jesus than doing his actual job - and lives are on the line - you know we’re deep in a full-blown disaster.
  14. I have always been a fan of Quinton in Buffalo and wish Josh gave him a few more looks sitting there wide open while Josh patted the ball looking deep lol
  15. Again, a payoff for what specifically? What is he getting from them (besides a plane that will be for Official Presidential use)? Using that brilliance, why not use fighter jets that have been maintained from almost 40 years ago? I mean, it's just that simple...
  16. No Taxes On Tips, Overtime, And Social Security? Not Exactly https://flip.it/1q0Io6
  17. Give me what you can tonight Time is all we have to play Tell me you can't live without me Tell me every day by day by day Nothing lasts forever, only fades away Day by day
  18. What does “significantly” mean in this context and why did you link to an article from April 10? Really nice work. The own goals never stop with you.
  19. It takes a long time for those dogsleds to bring in the ballot boxes!😀
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...