All Activity

He’d win the election again today if held

I think the greed screams 36

the STUPID I can't get over the scum hole San Diego reference Unhinged you say? Pot Meet Kettle LOL OMG if you could read yourself. Let the hate F L O W through you lol Im LAUGHING at you Im not even mad anymore its pathetic and NOW I say au revoir

My Daughter is coming home from College to visit. We'll have a fun day but her being here is all I need.

Yep, I stand corrected

Biden won the popular vote by a wider margin. By the same logic, most Americans thought his border policy and his spending bills were good. The American electoral system presents you with two choices. Most people disagree with significant parts of each presidential candidates agenda (example: explain why Trump voting states also voted for abortion rights). They understand that they are choosing from flawed candidates with flawed agendas, and that's why they seem to see a do-over every two or four years. If only presidential candidates understood this and governed accordingly. But no, they always have to misread their election as a mandate to do something or other that is way too far to the extremes given where most Americans find themselves.

Ok, maybe this is actually Quack.

I’m not an unhinged Karen protesting Trump for the 379,000,009th time which serves NO PURPOSE whatsoever. You and your trash do that because you people are completely fvvvcked in the head.

Thanks. I also think we make a mistake when we start talking about "manifestos." That word implies some kind of coherent political philosophy. The Unabomber (good documentary out about him now)? Oh, he was brilliant but crazy/evil, and he had a real "manifesto." These other killers have rambling jottings of madmen.

scum hole San Diego Now I have heard it All. WTAF But Im the crazy one where are you? LOL P A T H E T I C

I did make two mistakes above, which I owned up to. You haven't successfully pointed out one since then, though. Again, your argument is about money. How the Bills acquired the guy - whether they paid a draft pick for him - doesn't affect how much the Bills paid. They brought on board contracts they wanted. How they got those contracts is immaterial to arguments over money. How much money they had to pay, that's what mattered. "He wouldn't have gotten a salary of $1M in FA," you say? I see, you've talked to his agent, then, and Cooper himself? I'm sure that must have been quite a talk, you should tell us all about it. The fact is that some FAs get paid far less than they deserve in various situations: Feeling they can prove something in the short time with the new team, or the terms of the original contract mean that the player won't get any more total money with a new large contract than a new small one, for two. The key to the Bills accepting Cooper's money situation wasn't that he was traded rather than being acquired in FA. It was how much money they could get him for. Your argument is a financial one, how much money the Bills should spend on certain positions. Again, we brought in Diggs in a trade. And it was a great move. Re-signing him proved to be a bad one. But spending the money on him in the first place was brilliant. You keep wanting to ignore the wildly productive part of the Diggs story while using the bad part as one of your main bricks. It doesn't work that way in fair arguments. He was here for four years, not one. You're trying to finesse inconvenient facts away. You're arguing that those aren't part of your argument about money, because the McBeane contracts are a bit older or the Bills sent a draft pick to the other team, which means we can ignore that financial move and only talk about the stuff that confirms what you want to say. We get it. But it's not a strong argument. I know. But let's not talk about our outstanding continuous offensive success. Let's talk instead about how cheapness is killing our offense and a lack of skill players at WR and RB is ... is, um ... is a clear failure for this brain trust. Offensive success schmoffensive success.

Expansion beyond 32 teams would be a mistake.

I thought you left a while ago?

you are sick. keyboard warrior HERO BLOCKED WHAT A TOTAL #######

Brah.....weird choice of example to criticize McDermott's mindset. AJ Klein was out there playing MLB - the "QB of the defense". That was Dorian Williams rookie year, when he couldn't figure out his own assignment starting at OLB with Bernard barking in his ear like a seal. Dorian Williams could no more have taken on the MLB role in that game than he could have flapped his arms and flown over the stadium. It would have been a total CF.

I have a bills related Father’s Day picture to share but it’s too big (on my phone). How can I share it?

You realize that many people who voted for him expected truth and rational approach...now that was dumb. His present approval rating is?

Already did my time on the grill for lunch because the baby woke up at 5 am. I have her in her Bills inside of course One particular present is "one size fits all" 😜

C-Section with a classic this morning. Imagine someone echoing the words of this fat fk. Delusional and embarrassing.

I remember Bledsoe's first season with the Bills. The first half if the season he passed lights out. The second half Travis henry ran wild. Not much D.

But do you need 1st round talent CB's to execute in an "80% zone" scheme? Of course not. CB and S body types with baseline NFL quality traits are typically very easy to find relative to all other positions except *maybe* RB. It's why starting Bills CB's like Taron Johnson, Benford, Dane Jackson, and Levi Wallace were day 3 picks or UDFA. It's why there are people thinking Jordan Hancock or Dorian Strong could become starting players. By contrast, try finding boundary WR talent on day 3.

You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by 4th&long. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options 2 weeks later... You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options just stabbing the kitty while no one is listening lol

Keon and Kincaid are going to make this offense unstoppable 👀

I get all that, but to Einstein’s example, teachers get paid the same whether one kid shows up or 20 kids show up to class on any particular day. It’s not really relevant to the (off-topic) discussion. Teacher salaries are based on many factors in addition to class size, and are fixed for whatever the contract terms and conditions are over time. I think the library example is more relevant. Governments make books available for people to borrow and read, which takes away potential purchases of books people might otherwise make. Why is that not considered stealing, yet people watching a stream online that someone makes available are considered to be stealing? In both cases, people are taking advantage of opportunities to consume something with no direct reimbursement to the source.