All Activity
- Past hour
-
If the goal was to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program, then Trump’s move to scrap the JCPOA achieved the exact opposite - it freed Iran from the limits that had kept enrichment low and under international inspection. Since then, Iran has enriched uranium to 60%, expanded its centrifuge program, and restricted IAEA oversight. So if “slowing it down” was a problem, why support a move that sped it back up with no plan B? The JCPOA wasn’t perfect, but it was working and every major ally and the IAEA said so. Walking away from a verified agreement with no replacement wasn’t strength, it was reckless. Bottom line: If your standard is total elimination of enrichment, then no administration has met it. But only one president blew up a working deal with no backup and left Iran closer to a bomb: Trump.
-
That is tough one. I think the number is around $250K. Anything less would not change my life much. Would just use it to pay down the house or something like that so nothing really changes. An SB win though would really help my joy coefficient on a daily basis.
-
True. I mean you could say Jeff Wright over Kyle Williams if you're stuck in that time frame. Speaking of which, did the mod punish me for something I didn't know about as my posts keep getting deleted.
-
Well, that’s why there’s a chat room I guess.
-
Every year the Bills don't get in I end up saving thousands by not going to the Super Bowl. This season they have to get in because I have family in the Bay area & I won't have any lodging expense.
-
I was thinking… maybe for a new house… but $500?! Give me a break
-
Wrong movie. (But another classic.)
-
Los Angeles under military attack
AlBUNDY4TDS replied to Joe Ferguson forever's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Whose currently burning Los Angeles? Hint, it's the peaceful non militant blue state people. -
Bengals bungling things up - new rookie contract clause
ColoradoBills replied to The Wiz's topic in The Stadium Wall
If Cook holds out, he doesn't get paid. -
Selective Justice: The Hypocrisy of MAGA
Homelander replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Thanks for the unhinged rant - it’s a perfect example of deflection and false equivalence. First off, no one is defending looting or property destruction. It’s wrong - full stop. But let’s not pretend random opportunists smashing store windows are the same as a mob storming the Capitol to overturn a democratic election. One is criminal chaos, the other is an organized attempt to dismantle constitutional order. If you can’t tell the difference, you’re either willfully ignorant or just don’t care. You want to talk about "millions of rioters"? Cool. Now show me the convictions. Meanwhile, Trump just pardoned convicted felons who attacked police, broke into Congress, and tried to halt the peaceful transfer of power. As for your tirade about welfare, minorities, and "not working" - congrats, you’ve hit every Fox News talking point in one post. Doesn’t make any of it true. The idea that people protesting injustice are all paid foreign agents trying to burn the country down is pure tinfoil-hat fantasy. -
I think the "sweet spot" for the CFBP is 6 teams. It allows for the top 2 ranked teams to really have a good incentive to get a bye and a home playoff game to get into the National Championship while still having a wide enough field where you don't feel like no enough teams make it.
-
I’m just kidding, every generation does stuff other generations don’t get. For the record, I was the right age, but could NOT put up with disco.
-
Selective Justice: The Hypocrisy of MAGA
Homelander replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
@BillsFanNC VPN is on 🔥 this afternoon. 😅 -
Bengals bungling things up - new rookie contract clause
The Frankish Reich replied to The Wiz's topic in The Stadium Wall
Exactly. Maybe we should've thought of this before inking Cook's rookie deal. Seriously, though, if this is allowed by the CBA, why wouldn't a team do it? And if it is allowed by the CBA, congrats to the Bengals for hiring a lawyer smart enough to figure that out. -
I’d agree on a lot of the newer “mumble” rap, I think that stuff is trash, but actual lyricists, or artists who can rap with a message? Great stuff, with the peak of artistry in the 90s.
-
Bengals bungling things up - new rookie contract clause
Mango replied to The Wiz's topic in The Stadium Wall
Imagine writing a post about "early playoff exits" in order to prove a point that a team that has missed the playoffs two years in a row. I guess you're right. If you miss the playoffs more than you make the playoffs I guess you can't have very many early exits. But to your point, since the Bengals have decided to go this route of 5th year options and tags they've made the playoffs zero times. I don't think anybody disagrees that the Bills need to do more to address weapons around Josh. That includes the draft and money. They absolutely do But if you asked me right now to trade the other 52 players on the Bengals not named Burrow for the other 52 players not named Allen I would laugh you out the door. I'll beat this drum over and over again, great QB's who want the payday have to do more with less skill talent around them. The $50-60M deal has to cover the deficit in spend elsewhere -
LOL at Klieman...$500 is pretty insignificant, so unless someone was in despair, I doubt anyone takes the $500. 1 ticket to Disneyland costs that much lol. He should have done like $5k, $10k, $25k or something like that to make it more compelling of a decision at least. But $500K? Thats a different story, heck even $400k, $300k, $200k, etc...this is the kind of money I would use to make a lot more money over the next 3-5 years and impact my life/family, especially in my early retirement goals. Bills winning a SB isn't going to change my life. My world revolves around my wife and kids, as long as they are good, my life is perfect. But you give me an amount of money that I can use in a way to impact or benefit my life/family, then that always takes precedence over sports fandom for me.
-
No, see - that’s your problem, not mine. You can’t admit the obvious: Trump tore up a working deal just to pander to his base - because it had Obama’s name on it - and to appease the racists, hawks and neocons. You’re not offering solutions either. You’re just dodging, shifting the subject, and throwing out rhetorical fluff because you can’t defend what Trump actually did. Own the failure or stay in deflection mode. Either way, the facts aren’t going anywhere.
-
So, that's my (B) or (C). Right on cue: https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/in-twist-u-s-diplomacy-served-as-cover-for-israeli-surprise-attack-c79b2206?mod=WSJ_home_mediumtopper_pos_4 The headline is a little misleading (remember, in almost all newspapers, the article author doesn't write the headline), but nonetheless the article suggests more of (C).