Augie Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, White Linen said: I don't see any possibility this happens without McDermott's approval. I think they were both upset, but not necessarily with each other. Things happen and people get pissed off. It happens on the field too. You move on. Quote
JoeF Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) This thread discussion is like speculating on the breakup of Beavis and Butthead, of Peanut Butter and Jelly, of Hawn and Russell, of Sonny and Cher (*****, bad reference).... If there is a problem, we will be the last to know...but I think I heard Joe Schoen and Dan Morgan were making eyes at McD... Edited 1 hour ago by JoeF 1 Quote
US Egg Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 18 minutes ago, Augie said: Once again, there are degrees. My wife took us a way that forced us to make a left turn in a bad spot today. I’m not calling a divorce attorney in the morning. It’s not pure love, or pure hate, like any relationships at work. Have people not lived thru stuff in their working years? Some people you like, most people you just get along with. It’s National Enquirer, Gossip Magazine and People all rolled up into one in here on so many levels. Is Drama Kings a thing? Quote
TheFunPolice Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Maybe but it'll all be buried because we're about to win the Super Bowl! The AFC playoffs look like a 3 week stretch in the middle of the season in between prime time games Quote
bmur66 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 42 minutes ago, Einstein said: I don't know about divide, but McD was 100000% upset about losing Ingram. But would he still have been upset if Slay showed up with his lunch pail? Quote
Einstein Posted 58 minutes ago Posted 58 minutes ago 32 minutes ago, Augie said: I think they were both upset, but not necessarily with each other. Things happen and people get pissed off. It happens on the field too. You move on. I could just be misinterpreting, but McD certainly did not seem like he approved of that deal. Quote
GunnerBill Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago I don't know, and I don't necessarily see any of what we do know as a smoking gun. My two sources over recent years are both no longer in the organisation. But it would not surprise me. The Bills have underachieved in 2025 to this point. That creates tension and it is against a background where both know there is an external pressure on them to get over the hump. 2 Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago McD is finally seeing things a bit more clearly with those glasses: Quote
GunnerBill Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Einstein said: I could just be misinterpreting, but McD certainly did not seem like he approved of that deal. McDermott does not have approval over roster moves. Beane has control of the 53. Now previously I was always told they were very aligned so going back at least to two years ago I am certain they at least talk before this decision. But if there is a wider tension from this year as is speculated can I imagine a situation where they disagreed who the guy to expose to waivers was? Certainly. And here is my completely unfounded conspiratorial theory..... McDermott may well have wanted it to be Keon. The way that pick has worked out it is BOUND to have created tension. I can imagine McDermott being like "Brandon you can miss on talent that happens, but how the eff do you miss on a person so badly?" I think McDermott is done with Coleman. He won't be on the roster in 2026 IMO. 1 Quote
NeverOutNick Posted 51 minutes ago Posted 51 minutes ago 18 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said: Maybe but it'll all be buried because we're about to win the Super Bowl! The AFC playoffs look like a 3 week stretch in the middle of the season in between prime time games Love the positivity. Hope you’re right Quote
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago How the hell can McDermott not be perturbed by Beane's actions in the last couple years? Anybody who can't see his frustration at certain times is choosing to be blind! There 100% is tension and rightfully so. Quote
Whkfc Posted 36 minutes ago Posted 36 minutes ago There has been some rumblings on wgr lately as well. Not sure if its real or not they keep things pretty tight at OBD. But the rumors are out there. Quote
davefan66 Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago 1 hour ago, SoonerBillsFan said: Agreed,but we are at the point yhere is virtually no faith in the GM. And when you see this with a HC, the GM has to go,it won't be the coach. I can’t say there is no faith in Beane. This offseason will be huge to see what he does to give Josh better weapons, while adding a piece or two on D. Dude has a lot of work ahead. From what has been stated previously, McD may have more pull with ownership. And that is where it can go bad quickly. When two people are trying to save their own skins and potentially throwing one another under the bus. Would not have pictured either of them doing that until Beanes WR radio performance. Quote
BillsDad51 Posted 28 minutes ago Posted 28 minutes ago I'm sure McD had no input on using our first 4 picks on defense this year. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.