Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

Wow 4 pages and no one has uttered the words or even alluded to...

 

fantasy football

 

 

 

I agree with your picks and your takes.

 

 

Tradition... ya digg?

 

😆

 

 

Good laugh on that one!

 

 

Unless it's a majority, the bolded wouldn't be an accurate statement.

 

 

Horrible voice too... and wow... pasty complexion.

 

Why is he "successful?"

 

He's legitimately one of the greatest modern musicians 

Posted
Just now, DapperCam said:

This is the wrong decision, take the points

Agree. Unless the force a couple of three and outs, they may not see the ball on two additional possessions

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

And I thought it was bad when he was going for it on his side of the 50 in the first half against the Eagles on a high wind night.

Edited by billsfan714
Posted
2 minutes ago, zow2 said:

Dummies,  kick the stupid FG and make it 31-24.  My gosh this Campbell ruins the games for Detroit more than he wins them.

easy decision to go for it

 

G6ygMatWEAAJpRh?format=jpg&name=small

  • Disagree 1
Posted
Just now, GoBills808 said:

easy decision to go for it

 

G6ygMatWEAAJpRh?format=jpg&name=small


Why should I trust some random statistical model that is probably not even valid from some random twitter person? Taking the points there is the obvious choice.

Posted
1 minute ago, Simon said:

I'm all for being aggressive on 4th down, but that was irretrievably stupid.

 

 

I think Campbell has crossed the line this year and should have taken the FG on the earlier 4th down, but this one going for it was automatic IMO. They haven't stopped Green Bay all night and are running out of time.

Posted
Just now, HappyDays said:

 

I think Campbell has crossed the line this year and should have taken the FG on the earlier 4th down, but this one going for it was automatic IMO. They haven't stopped Green Bay all night and are running out of time.

absolute no brainer to go for it there

1 minute ago, DapperCam said:


Why should I trust some random statistical model that is probably not even valid from some random twitter person? Taking the points there is the obvious choice.

lol right

 

you dont know who ben baldwin is

'random statistical model' 😂😂

 

STATS ARE FOR LOSERZZZZ

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...