harmonkillebrew Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago What happened to the 6 OL package that the Bills used to such fanfare last year? Has Alec Andersen been hurt? Has Jackson Hawes surpassed him with the TE pass-catching added advantage? I thought that package gave us a tougher attitude. Imposing our will on other teams. Yet I don't think I've seen it once in recent weeks. Hawes has been good, but has he been that good to eliminate the package entirely? Quote
Simon Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, harmonkillebrew said: Hawes has been good, but has he been that good to eliminate the package entirely? Yes 1 2 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, harmonkillebrew said: What happened to the 6 OL package that the Bills used to such fanfare last year? Has Alec Andersen been hurt? Has Jackson Hawes surpassed him with the TE pass-catching added advantage? I thought that package gave us a tougher attitude. Imposing our will on other teams. Yet I don't think I've seen it once in recent weeks. Hawes has been good, but has he been that good to eliminate the package entirely? It's been more the fact that Hawes is a beast blocker. Yes, he's been good enough to take that spot. It also gives the Bills some versitality as he can still run a route as a receiver with some credibility where Anderson in let's the defense know it's a much higher percentage that it will be a run play. Quote
boyst Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Simon said: Yes Hawes has been that good + after that big catch it was obvious that teams did not expect him to run like that. Hawes is a force and needs to be used in packages with 6OL + Hawes + Gilliam to power run. and to make it more about Kincaid and the overall dynamic. As i have been saying we are blessed with 3 very good TEs each with a different skillset. the problem is the Kyle Pitts mistake, as i think of it. Pitts is a good pass catching tight end but teams don't cover him like a TE. they cover him like a slot so he can't be productive. if he had to beat LB's he'd win. it today's NFL good LB's can still cover Kincaid and Pitts, and most safeties, can too without being bodied. so we have a TE who isn't fast enough or good enough hands to be a WR being labeled a TE for that very reason. that's why i like Knox as a TE more. he can block, he can catch as well as the average TE, and he can do the balance of work required. Hawes may have more talent than we realize catching and we have no idea how good his routes are or how good he is at exploiting open zones or finding seams. Quote
Big Turk Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Not needed as much because Hawes is effectively the 6th OL. Quote
BearNorth Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I suspect Hawes [Yale grad - dad is a surgeon, mom is an attorney] is one of the smartest guys in the room, so there's that as well. Quote
DJB Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Screw it. 6 OL and Hawes to block. Why didn’t we do that against Atlanta? 2 Quote
GoBills808 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago it went away because its a gimmick something you can get away w for a season before it becomes unsustainable Quote
NoName Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I did find it interesting that Alec Anderson replaced McGovern instead of SVP. Quote
Captain_Quint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, NoName said: I did find it interesting that Alec Anderson replaced McGovern instead of SVP. Yeah, I think Anderson started the season listed as the backup to all three interior line spots. 1 Quote
harmonkillebrew Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, DJB said: Screw it. 6 OL and Hawes to block. Why didn’t we do that against Atlanta? That's what I'm talking about! Atlanta had a mean pass rush, so we should have run it down their throats! 3 minutes ago, NoName said: I did find it interesting that Alec Anderson replaced McGovern instead of SVP. That's a good point and maybe part of why they don't want or risk him as 6th OL. They need him as the main backup. 1 Quote
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I was thinking this exact same thing. I know the plan was to replace the extra OL with Hawes. My thought was why not use both. Use 6 linemen AND Hawes and let’s see if we can’t block it up Quote
Brandon Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Jackson Hawes provides more versatility and is an excellent run blocker in his own right. Quote
The Frankish Reich Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago 1 hour ago, harmonkillebrew said: What happened to the 6 OL package that the Bills used to such fanfare last year? Has Alec Andersen been hurt? Has Jackson Hawes surpassed him with the TE pass-catching added advantage? I thought that package gave us a tougher attitude. Imposing our will on other teams. Yet I don't think I've seen it once in recent weeks. Hawes has been good, but has he been that good to eliminate the package entirely? Hawes is a more traditional heavy package choice, but man, I miss those runs with Alec Anderson clearing out a LB or DB like a snowplow in a Buffalo blizzard. Quote
gobills404 Posted 25 minutes ago Posted 25 minutes ago He didn’t get the ball either play but here’s why they moved away from 6 OL. Hawes doesn’t even have to run an actual route to have a chance at chunk plays on play action. Top of the screen on both plays. Quote
colin Posted 19 minutes ago Posted 19 minutes ago i think we can go super jumbo like baltimore did last year. just maul teams up front from time to time, and pass out of it to the tight ends or back, or single WR if they coverage brakes down. brady is creative with odd mixes of people and strange playcalls, but he hasn't found a way to show one look and run lots of different things (that work) out of it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.