Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Bangarang said:

Time wise, this is very fortunate. I would expect him to be available for the opener though. 

why?  high ankle sprains, if not handled VERY carefully, can linger for months

Posted
7 hours ago, Rocky Landing said:

Shakir does not need another minute of practice before the season starts. I hope they don't let him back on the field until he's 100%, even if it means missing the first game or two. Better to miss some early games than have this injury linger.

Hell, I say keep him out until he's 125%. He doesn't need to rush back for the Ravens. These injuries are very tricky. We need him most for the home stretch. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

They can linger.  I remember this being the Gabe Davis excuse his first year as the #2 WR.  If it's the same severity that Shakir had last year I'm not worried.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

Hell, I say keep him out until he's 125%. He doesn't need to rush back for the Ravens. These injuries are very tricky. We need him most for the home stretch. 

You can't be more than 100%.  If he's 100% then play him because the Ravens game you could argue might be our biggest game of the year.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

You can't be more than 100%.  If he's 100% then play him because the Ravens game you could argue might be our biggest game of the year.

I’m over 100%

Posted
4 hours ago, Shortchaz said:

Bills aren’t going to be 100% at the start of the season (which we knew), are they going to be 100% at any point is the question that remains 

That goes for every team.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

"Week one is a liar."

What does that have to do with the importance of the game?  That and the KC game are potentially the biggest games of the year.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Doc Brown said:

What does that have to do with the importance of the game?  That and the KC game are potentially the biggest games of the year.

I just don't see any circumstance in which week one would be considered "our biggest game of the year," especially vs. a non-divisional opponent.

  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, ProcessTruster said:

why?  high ankle sprains, if not handled VERY carefully, can linger for months

 

What makes you think it won't be handled carefully until the season starts?

Posted
23 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

I just don't see any circumstance in which week one would be considered "our biggest game of the year," especially vs. a non-divisional opponent.

Could easily be the tie breaker for the number 1 or 2 seed.  Not that hard to contemplate.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

You can't be more than 100%.  If he's 100% then play him because the Ravens game you could argue might be our biggest game of the year.


yea, it very well could be home field and a bye

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

You can't be more than 100%.  If he's 100% then play him because the Ravens game you could argue might be our biggest game of the year.

 He could be 111% that's one more than 110%

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, DCofNC said:

I hope they shelf him until it’s completely healed even if that means we don’t see him till week 3 or 4.  I would rather him at 100% when it matters than 80% all year.

Agree...nothing you can do...injuries happen....shut him down for a month. Get that ankle treatment & rest and next man up. Time for players like Coleman and Moore to step up.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...