UPDATE: ISRAEL V IRAN - Trump just announced we bombed Fordow

[Mikie2times]

4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

⬆️

 

 

😂

MAGA fundraising in North Carolina 

[Big Blitz]

1 hour ago, Mikie2times said:

You think this is about a nuclear bomb now? This is why it matters to have a chess player vs a checker player. To have egos checked. Nobody would argue over removing Irans nuclear capability. It was always about what comes next. This cant end with that regime in power. US assets and civilians will be at higher risk. Greater conflict will follow. It’s not as if we just dropped down a full house and called it a day. When you think this ends it won’t be over and that is the best case scenario. We will only be left with a greater commitment of military assets to that region. Anybody who thinks that isn’t the case is living in MAGA land. Let’s try and not be dumb here. 

 

What?

[Mikie2times]

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

 

What?

So we can bomb Iran nuclear sites in a vacuum? Please tell me you’re smarter than our president. I expect as much on a Bills message board. 

[Big Blitz]

34 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

So we can bomb Iran nuclear sites in a vacuum? Please tell me you’re smarter than our president. I expect as much on a Bills message board. 

 

 

Omg.  
 

What the hell were they doing at those nuclear sites?

 

Making tariff free tea for the world?

 

[Big Blitz]

 

[RobbRiddick]

7 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

 Iran is going to respond.  This is dangerous.   Especially having God knows how many terrorists here thanks to open border Biden.  

 

This is the part I've been wondering about the most. For years we've heard people say that they've been amassing an army who have been waiting to get the "execute order 66" message. Now we will find out if that's true or not. I hope to god it isn't

[Niagara Bill]

I am not a maga trump lover. I do support a few policies but detest methods.

However IMHO, this is the first time he has acted presidential. Now if he can only refrain from name calling, blaming Biden and Obama, and not selling hats with the June 21st date on the front, this can become a success. 

[ComradeKayAdams]

11 hours ago, aristocrat said:

I could also make up numbers and say the total I gave was too high and it’s only 10k. 

I guess trump didn’t chicken out 

 

Brilliant retort! Super profound! Much logic! Many insight!

 

Yes, a guess from a random online MAGA Carolina bumpkin carries the same approximate weight as an estimate from a peer-reviewed publication in the world’s most prestigious medical journal.

 

And yes, Trump certainly did a lot to help dispel that mean-spirited TACO label. Proving people wrong who say mean things about you is the most important component of foreign policy. Careful, measured analyses of the long-term consequences of one’s actions is for soy boys, women, and the LGBTQ+. MANLY MEN bomb sh!t and scream, “America! F*ck yeah!” in any nearby faces of brown-skinned people with funny-sounding names.

 

I am STILL WAITING, by the way, for any evidence that Iran’s nuclear program posed an IMMINENT threat to Israel and the United States. Perhaps one of you warmongering PPP’ers, replete with MIC stocks but totally devoid of the physical fitness to serve in battle, will step up to the plate in this regard??

[thenorthremembers]

8 hours ago, Homelander said:

 

You're having a very difficult time swallowing your pride.

 

Really sad "chicken little posts" trigger you so... but expected.  Right @BillsFanNC?

 

 

 

I dont need to swallow my pride.  If did I'd be the first to admit it. 

 

From a sampling of your posts you stand with Hezbollah, Iran, Illegal Immigrants, Wife beating MS13 members, Looters, Rioters, and parents who think its acceptable to castrate their kids.   

 

If you think thats the side of good well then continue spamming this board with your nonsense.  

 

 

[SectionC3]

8 hours ago, stevestojan said:

It was certainly a far step up from his al-Baghdadi speech. I’ll give him that I suppose. 

Objectively I thought it was terrible.  The focus was on Israel.  Mr. secular "Prince of Peace" bombed an adversary for the benefit of Israel, not as part of his "America First" approach.  And the "We love you God" line was just abhorrent.  Invoking God while starting a war and deporting people who look like God's son is simply wrong.  

7 hours ago, Homelander said:

 

You’re spot on. Most Americans know nothing about Iran’s real history or the people there. Before 1979, cities like Tehran were hubs of modernity. Today, a clear majority of Iranians want a democratic system, not religious rule . They’re forward-thinking, diverse, and determined but trapped under a repressive regime.

 

Yet here we are, with the Trump administration importing that same authoritarian playbook to the US.

 

Deploying federalized National Guard troops and Marines without state permission. Legal experts and civil rights groups have called it a dangerous overreach and a “chilling push past the law”

 

But that’s precisely what MAGA voters signed up for - it’s only a matter of time before this regime turns its authoritarian playbook on them too.

 

Exactly.  Everyone who does business with this guy eventually gets burned.  

[SCBills]

6 hours ago, Mikie2times said:

So we can bomb Iran nuclear sites in a vacuum? Please tell me you’re smarter than our president. I expect as much on a Bills message board. 

Maybe. Maybe not.

 

Trump took out Soleimani and then ish-talked him from the White House… Iran barely responded. 
 

This is obviously a bigger deal, but the only real worry I have is Iran activating any terror cells they have in America.  Which, ironically, is why I’m leaning more towards being glad we did what we did.. because Iran with nukes, given how they operate, isn’t the same as Russia or North Korea. 
 

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

29 minutes ago, ComradeKayAdams said:

I am STILL WAITING, by the way, for any evidence that Iran’s nuclear program posed an IMMINENT threat to Israel and the United States. Perhaps one of you warmongering PPP’ers, replete with MIC stocks but totally devoid of the physical fitness to serve in battle, will step up to the plate in this regard??

Evidence? What a concept. I'd dare say the evidence of an iminent threat has been destroyed. Or perhaps the evidence of there not being any immenent threat has been destroyed. Either way, that secret will most certainly be kept well hidden by the governments of America and Isreal.

 

For me the major theme at play remains intact. If you want to protect yourself from attacks launched at the whims of countries possessing big league military capabilities and nuclear weapons you better get some nukes too as that seems to be the only deterrent they fear.

 

[aristocrat]

 

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

The Iranians didn't even fire back at our aircraft. Nothing! These attacks were either totally invisible or Iran had nothing left to fire. 

[Orlando Buffalo]

59 minutes ago, ComradeKayAdams said:

 

Brilliant retort! Super profound! Much logic! Many insight!

 

Yes, a guess from a random online MAGA Carolina bumpkin carries the same approximate weight as an estimate from a peer-reviewed publication in the world’s most prestigious medical journal.

 

And yes, Trump certainly did a lot to help dispel that mean-spirited TACO label. Proving people wrong who say mean things about you is the most important component of foreign policy. Careful, measured analyses of the long-term consequences of one’s actions is for soy boys, women, and the LGBTQ+. MANLY MEN bomb sh!t and scream, “America! F*ck yeah!” in any nearby faces of brown-skinned people with funny-sounding names.

 

I am STILL WAITING, by the way, for any evidence that Iran’s nuclear program posed an IMMINENT threat to Israel and the United States. Perhaps one of you warmongering PPP’ers, replete with MIC stocks but totally devoid of the physical fitness to serve in battle, will step up to the plate in this regard??

You believe that we will see the evidence in less than 10 years? I am certain we still have sources in the Iranian program who are feeding us info and I would prefer they not get murdered so you feel better. the fact that your immediate reaction is to defend Iran vs the US shows how messed up mentally you are. 

[Wacka]

3 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

The Iranians didn't even fire back at our aircraft. Nothing! These attacks were either totally invisible or Iran had nothing left to fire. 

What do you think the Israelis were doing the last few weeks?

According to the press conference, the whole operation took maybe a half an hour.

Edited 1 hour ago by Wacka

[BillsFanNC]

Hey commie comradekay has thoughts!

 

Zero ***** given for any "logic" coming from a self identified communist.

 

Hey at least you're not merely a useful idiot, so you've got that going for you which is nice.

 

 

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

4 minutes ago, Wacka said:

What do you think the Israelis were doing the last few weeks?

According to the press conference, the whole operation took maybe a half an hour.

There is also the fact that the stealth capabilities, decoys and electronic suppression simply blinded them. Watching this its hard not to get the impression we are sending message to China, we are still the best military. 

 

At least for now  

[BillsFanNC]

 

 

[Trump_is_Mentally_fit]

The most serious thing Iran could do would be to try and obstruct passage through the straights of Hormuz. But that also hurts them. Would love to hear their discussions on how or if to retaliate. The US has stated regime change is not something on the table, so that might actually embolden the mullahs to do something. 

 

https://www.newsweek.com/iran-threat-shut-strait-hormuz-2088018

 

Iran has warned that it could shut the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most critical oil transit chokepoints, in retaliation for U.S. involvement in its conflict with Israel.

"If the United States officially and operationally enters the war in support of the Zionists (Israel), it is the legitimate right of Iran in view of pressuring the U.S. and Western countries to disrupt their oil trade's ease of transit," Ali Yazdikhah, a senior Iranian lawmaker, was quoted as saying by the semi-official Mehr news agency on Thursday.

"Iran has numerous options to respond to its enemies," Behnam Saeedi, a member of the parliament's National Security Committee presidium was quoted as saying. "Closing the Strait of Hormuz is one of the potential options."

The officials spoke amid heightened tensions as President Donald Trump is reported to be inching closer to ordering military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.