Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, wjag said:

I really don't get McD's vote to ban it.   Buffalo clearly used it to great effect.  Let's vote to take away a high percentage play to get first downs and TDs.  👀

You never know what goes on behind the scenes.  Goodell could've promised him no Holiday games if he leads the charge to get this eyesore banned because horrible TV means less eyes in the long run.

 

If you want to go the non cynical route, McDermott saw what happened in the NFC Championship and the Redskins keep trying to jump the count at the one yard line.  It looked like an eye sore and you can see the potential for injury there with them trying to leap over lineman before the ball is even snapped.  They could've easily went helmet to helmet with Hurts.  The NFL has always been a reactive league so he's basically worried that if they don't ban it here will be a catastrophic injury on the play down the road.  That's what it seemed like to me based on how he's answered the questions at the last owners meaning.  Even though we benefit from the tush push.

Posted
42 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

You never know what goes on behind the scenes.  Goodell could've promised him no Holiday games if he leads the charge to get this eyesore banned because horrible TV means less eyes in the long run.

 

If you want to go the non cynical route, McDermott saw what happened in the NFC Championship and the Redskins keep trying to jump the count at the one yard line.  It looked like an eye sore and you can see the potential for injury there with them trying to leap over lineman before the ball is even snapped.  They could've easily went helmet to helmet with Hurts.  The NFL has always been a reactive league so he's basically worried that if they don't ban it here will be a catastrophic injury on the play down the road.  That's what it seemed like to me based on how he's answered the questions at the last owners meaning.  Even though we benefit from the tush push.

 

So if he was so dead set against it on the grounds of player safety, the Bills won't use it this year?  To use it would seem hypocritical if the argument was player safety.

Posted

It works so well foir the Eagles because:

 

1) Although he doesn't look that much the part, Jalen Hurts is a monster in the weight room. He is super strong and is very tough to stop.

 

2) Watch the replays and look at that offensive line. They are crushing defenders. Defense are smaller these day because it is more of a passing league. I have seen Landon Dickerson push defenders three yards or more into the endzone. I could have scored a TD on some of those plays. OK I would be in either the hospital or morgue upon completion but you get my point.

 

I think it is good for the game. If other teams want to do this, nothing is stopping them from concentrating more on blockers on draft day.Barkley is great, but he didn't get those yards on his own. He had a great, physical OL in front of him. 

 

If the Bills were utilizing this play as well as the Eagles the fans cheering would be deafening, and I would be leading the chorus.

 

Jmo.

Posted
5 hours ago, wjag said:

 

So if he was so dead set against it on the grounds of player safety, the Bills won't use it this year?  To use it would seem hypocritical if the argument was player safety.

He has two separate jobs.  One on the competition committee and one as the head coach.  What he does on the competition committee should have nothing to do with what he does as a head coach.  He'll keep running it as long as the league allows it.

Posted
3 hours ago, mannc said:

It’s a rugby play that has no place in football.  Get rid of it.

This seems like a talking point. In what way is it a rugby play? And if it is….isnt a simple pitch play one also? OJ made a career out of that one. 

Posted

It's amazing so much energy is being expended on a perfectly legal football play any team can use.  It matches strength vs strength.  Eliminating it because one team is really good at it makes no sense. 

 

 

It is so rarely used (0.285% of all Offensive plays last year), it's not worth debating.

Posted
15 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

What?

 

1. We don’t have plays that are hard to officiate? Since when? EVERY QB sneak is hard to spot.

 

2. Boring? Really? I guess we can’t allow the kneel down.

 

3. QB is at risk? Then don’t run the play!!!! It’s a choice. 

 

4. Unfair to defense? Right! We can’t have a play that’s hard to defend. Huh? 
 

5. Your final comment is NOT an argument against the tush push. But, as long as you went there, why not allow a player to be thrown over the line. Again, isn’t it the offense’s choice? 

 

Responses:

1.  Just because you have some hard to officiate plays does not mean you should have more.  Less hard to officiate plays the better.  It's a scrum and the officials (and fans at first) have no clue how far the ball went.  The real injustice showed in the KC/Bills game where even upon their limited review they still got it wrong.

2.  Once again, just because you have some boring plays does not mean you need more.  They have a chance to get rid of an ugly boring play - they should do it.

3.  Yes, obviously there is a chance the QB gets hurt.  Of course you have the option of not running the odds on most successful playt, but that is hard for a coach to opt for.  Kind of like when the Bills didn't want to run Josh, the Dorsey offense took a hit for it.  Can you imagine the heat McD would have received had he chose to hand the ball off on that 4tth and inches and not gotten it?  

4.  The unfairness to the defense was exposed in the WA game, where they had a defense of sending a person over the top at the snap of the ball.  They mis-timed it a few times and were told that the next time the offense would be awarded a TD - that was ridiculous.

5.  Allowing a person to be thrown over a pile would be a terrible move for the sport of football, kind of like the tush-push is now.  It was an example of the sport needing to put a rule in for something they did not foresee.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...