Jump to content

Bills interested in Deebo Samuel per Mike Giardi


Recommended Posts

No they aren’t, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 947 said:

We already signed Deebo-lite in Samuel, this makes no sense. Aiyuk is the 49ers WR we should be interested in.

Deebo’s the biggest game changing weapon in football. He makes us  markedly more dangerous and is the perfect complement to our receiving corp and RBs. Question is how does Beane fit him under the cap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Well, if it's for a pick this year, he better be restructuring right now because 7 pm is fast approaching. Something tells me that's not on his plate right now. Anyway, if there was any team that would do it (and I don't think they will), it should be NE, a receiver-less team with $53.7 million in cap space.

 

 

It's paperwork and likely already prepared ahead if the possibility of a trade for a vet had been considered(which it likely has).    For all we know everything could be done and agreed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is all smoke and mirrors. The cap hit for Deebo would be almost $43M and SF only has $6M open right now. A Deebo trade would jump his cap hit by $16M. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, H2o said:

This is all smoke and mirrors. The cap hit for Deebo would be almost $43M and SF only has $6M open right now. A Deebo trade would jump his cap hit by $16M. 

 

You're probably right, but we heard the same things about Diggs not being able to be traded, yet he was.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How on Earth is this nonsense 10 pages already?  LMAO

 

Guess y'all didn't learn your lesson in yesterday's like 80 pager on how we are gonna make a big move up in the draft nonsense lol.  

 

 

2 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

You're probably right, but we heard the same things about Diggs not being able to be traded, yet he was.

 

 

Diggs trade only increased his cap hit $3M...thats a BIG difference in the $16M it jumps SF cap hit.  

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:

How on Earth is this nonsense 10 pages already?  LMAO

 

Guess y'all didn't learn your lesson in yesterday's like 80 pager on how we are gonna make a big move up in the draft nonsense lol.  

 

 

 

The Zach Ertz thread needs to challenged. 😁

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

How on Earth is this nonsense 10 pages already?  LMAO

 

Guess y'all didn't learn your lesson in yesterday's like 80 pager on how we are gonna make a big move up in the draft nonsense lol.  

 

 

 

Diggs trade only increased his cap hit $3M...thats a BIG difference in the $16M it jumps SF cap hit.  

 

It doesn’t. It frees up 6M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Eastport bills said:

Deebo’s the biggest game changing weapon in football. He makes us  markedly more dangerous and is the perfect complement to our receiving corp and RBs. Question is how does Beane fit him under the cap?

 

Wow, that is quite the over exaggeration there.  He is a nice weapon, especially after the catch.  But he is not a great deep ball WR, he doesn't have the best hands, and Brandon Aiyuk is by far the better actual WR on that team.  Deebo makes up for what he lacks as a pure WR in his YAC and his versatility as a runner.  

 

He also has injury issues.  But the issue is that we have Samuel, Shakir, and Kincaid who are all going to attack from the slot and the short to medium areas of the field.  That is Deebo's sweet spot, so I don't know he is such a great fit for us.  We need a true boundary WR who can attack all 3 phases of the field more than another short area attack weapon.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

You're probably right, but we heard the same things about Diggs not being able to be traded, yet he was.

 

 

No one really said that.  They said it would be idiotic.  Which might be true. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Not what it says above...says it jumps his cap hit by $16M.  I didn't look into it, just trusting what I am reading in this thread.  

They are wrong. Spotrac has it saving them money if they trade him. 
 

Why would you trust anything on here? 

Edited by FireChans
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bills!Win! said:

Wouldn’t it be weird having two players at the same position with the same last name? 

Like the season we had nine guys on the roster named "Williams"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FireChans said:

They are wrong. Spotrac has it saving them money if they trade him. 
 

Why would you trust anything on here? 

 

Because I don't care to invest time to look into something that has almost no chance of happening.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...