Jump to content

Diggs cryptic comments - 2024 edition


Einstein

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Billl said:

I think the timeline is backwards here. Diggs was basically saying “you’re about to find out what Josh looks like without a number 1”.

 

Diggs must have forgotten the last half of last season, where Allen played without a #1 WR because Diggs was stinking up the joint.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

Funny part is that even with this trade, people won’t believe that his cryptic tweets were messages. They simply won’t get it.

 

Yup. A lot of people buried their head in the sand. I'm still shocked this actually happened, but the signs have been there for a while and continued this offseason.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Einstein said:

This whole thread could be submitted to Cold Takes Exposed.

 

@Beck Water and @H2o with early nominees. That reporter nailed everything. From the team, to the literal pick we landed.

 

IMG-8554.jpg

 

IMG-8553.jpg

Guilty as charged :lol:

 

Raise Hand GIF by Nick Jonas

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, sven233 said:

Diggs is going to be here for at least a couple more years.  There is just no justifying anything else with the dead money on his contract.  If Diggs truly wanted out, which I don't think he does, he just has to go to Beane and tell him that he will rip up his current deal, agree to one with no guaranteed money, and then get traded.  But with the guarantees in his current contract, trading or releasing him would be flat out dumb.

 

All that said, it's the main reason we have to find our future WR1 in this draft.  Diggs, even if he is here, is heading towards WR2 status sooner than later.  We need to nail this pick and find a guy that could possibly be ready by the end of this season heading into the Playoffs that can grow into the new go to guy.

But is he though?  That’s the real question 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

If you didn't think his tweets meant anything, you were wrong. I'm guessing him taking a swing at his QB last night was the last straw for the team.

What?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FireChans said:

What?


You may have missed it (I did too), but yesterday Diggs essentially inferred that Allen's success was due to him.

Someone tweeted that Diggs is a good receiver but Allen's success was not "essential" to have Diggs.

Diggs responded "You sure?"

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

For the love of god, how thin skinned are some of you? 

 

Yeah, Diggs is a drama llama and a bit of a ***** stirrer. I don't care. I don't remember him ever slagging off the team in public. The closest was his visible frustration on the sideline at how poor the game planning and execution for the offense was for the Bengals game which...same.

 

Remember when he posted a heart emoji, and then "Ready for Whatever" and people assumed he was trying to force his way off the team? Some people got an idea fixed in their head and are going to interpret all evidence to that end, regardless of context.

This aged like milk on a hot summer day

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Einstein said:

This morning…

 

———-

 

RG3: Is Diggs essential to Josh Allen’s success?

 

Random tweeter responds to RG3: Diggs helped, but he is not essential to Allen’s success.


Diggs response: You sure?

 

———-

 

And yet fans still think Diggs wasn’t giving cryptic messages 🤦🏻‍♂️

 

Um, that was a lot less cryptic than many of his other messages.  It reads more like "you're about to do that experiment" vs. his earlier stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...