Jump to content

Trump Urging Republicans To Reject Border Security Deal-Keep the invasion going! 300,000 last month!


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

:lol:

 

Roundyfuk.c also would vie for a top 3 position if not for its sporadic contributions.

 

But man when it does post? Epic stupidity and useful idiocy on full blown display. Cranks it right to 11.

They don't have an organic though in their heads.   Just group think and parroting of dnc/msm talking points 

 

With every post they prove it. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tommy Callahan said:

They don't have an organic though in their heads.   Just group think and parroting of dnc/msm talking points 

 

With every post they prove it. 


If they hate America why are they desperately trying to come here?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roundybout said:


If they hate America why are they desperately trying to come here?

Asylum pays more than the median income in the countries they are leaving. 

 

Eff.  If it's not regulated you don't even know who they are.  So how would you know their intentions?  Derp

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Asylum pays more than the median income in the countries they are leaving. 

 

Eff.  If it's not regulated you don't even know who they are.  So how would you know their intentions?  Derp


Sounds like they want opportunity for a better life and to advance themselves, then. You know, the principles that America was founded on?

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Sounds like they want opportunity for a better life and to advance themselves, then. You know, the principles that America was founded on?

 

And who came here legally?

Welcoming should not be suicide.

That's why we have laws.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Why would it be suicide? 
 

Go on, you know you want to say it.

 

I'm not sure what you are inferring, but the US taxpayer cannot support this level of illegal immigration.

Simply economically impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

I'm not sure what you are inferring, but the US taxpayer cannot support this level of illegal immigration.

Simply economically impossible.

 

You're supposed to admit that you're a racist. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

You're supposed to admit that you're a racist. 

 

Oh. 

I wonder what race?

Ten years of South/Central America trips watching this industry.

 

Ya. Must be racist.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

border-crisis-010223-3.jpg?resize=789,46

 

 

 

Andrew McCarthy: It Is Not Texas That’s Defying the Law — It’s Biden. 

 

FTA:

This dispute will play out politically more than legally.

 

The “Civil War” talk is hyperbole, driven by Democrats who grasp that Biden’s position is not politically sustainable, especially with Election Day just months away.

 

This is why Biden is desperate to cut a deal with moderate Senate Republicans. When that falls apart — not because of Donald Trump’s machinations but because it is a terrible deal for the country — Biden will either have to cave (i.e., engage in actual border enforcement and refrain from interfering in state border enforcement) or seek election as the president who is suing the beleaguered people of Texas on behalf of illegal aliens — having ushered into the country more than 6 million of them (more than the population of 33 states).

 

“When it is said that the states must comply with federal law, that means statutory law, not the whims of the executive branch. Biden’s policy is not federal law. Federal law, which the president refuses to faithfully execute, calls for detention. As I have explained before, Biden’s actions are in gross violation of the law.”

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/it-is-not-texas-thats-defying-the-law-its-biden/

 

 

  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

border-crisis-010223-3.jpg?resize=789,46

 

 

 

Andrew McCarthy: It Is Not Texas That’s Defying the Law — It’s Biden. 

 

FTA:

This dispute will play out politically more than legally.

 

The “Civil War” talk is hyperbole, driven by Democrats who grasp that Biden’s position is not politically sustainable, especially with Election Day just months away.

 

This is why Biden is desperate to cut a deal with moderate Senate Republicans. When that falls apart — not because of Donald Trump’s machinations but because it is a terrible deal for the country — Biden will either have to cave (i.e., engage in actual border enforcement and refrain from interfering in state border enforcement) or seek election as the president who is suing the beleaguered people of Texas on behalf of illegal aliens — having ushered into the country more than 6 million of them (more than the population of 33 states).

 

“When it is said that the states must comply with federal law, that means statutory law, not the whims of the executive branch. Biden’s policy is not federal law. Federal law, which the president refuses to faithfully execute, calls for detention. As I have explained before, Biden’s actions are in gross violation of the law.”

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/it-is-not-texas-thats-defying-the-law-its-biden/

 

 

yeah, he left out that federal agents can't get to the border there in direct conflict with SCOTUS majority.  wonder why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


Why would it be suicide? 
 

Go on, you know you want to say it.

Sneak into our friendly northern neighbors country.  Just overstay a visa in Canada.

 

Why do you all have a problem with knowing who is coming?  

 

Why do you support a process that results in people being hurt, raped, murdered?  

1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


If they hate America why are they desperately trying to come here?

Like back when my relatives came though a port of call?  When they had floating ships for the sick so they didn't come into the population sick?  

 

Probably just like yours and most of our relatives did 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Biden gotta be betting the illegals being able to vote can save him.  

 

 

So stop taking 'resources' from oppressed Americans, and giving them to other oppressed people.  Resources meaning the same low paying jobs, that have never allowed minority groups to move up the socioeconomic ladder, but rather keep them there.  The 'resources' that the GQP both loves and hate at the same time.  Got it.  

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sherpa said:

 

I'm not sure what you are inferring, but the US taxpayer cannot support this level of illegal immigration.

Simply economically impossible.

Thank you for a logical response. With such, you have shut roundy up, albeit temporarily. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 


“we’re being invaded and America is doomed but don’t you dare try to pass any legislation to fix it and also we’re impeaching the Homeland Security secretary and also shutting down the government”

 

Pestilent vermin, all of them. Not fit to lead a Dollar General.

2 hours ago, sherpa said:

 

I'm not sure what you are inferring, but the US taxpayer cannot support this level of illegal immigration.

Simply economically impossible.


Thank goodness you’re not leaning into the Great Replacement theory crud that many prominent right wingers do. 
 

It’s completely feasible. Read “One Billion Americans” by Matt Yglesias 

1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Biden gotta be betting the illegals being able to vote can save him.  

 

 


Hispanic groups tend to vote conservative. This is another myth the GOP tells you to stay angry all the time. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


“we’re being invaded and America is doomed but don’t you dare try to pass any legislation to fix it and also we’re impeaching the Homeland Security secretary and also shutting down the government”

 

 

Passing a bill that will NOT address the problem, simply to look like you are,

 

The leftist way.

 

.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Passing a bill that will NOT address the problem, simply to look like you are,

 

The leftist way.

 

.


GOP came up with it. Seems like you guys don’t want any solution that doesn’t involve shooting anyone that tries to come over 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


“we’re being invaded and America is doomed but don’t you dare try to pass any legislation to fix it 

 

We have laws to stop it.

This administration chooses to not enforce those restraints for political reasons.

 

Same as the goofy strategy of buying votes by promising to strap the US taxpayer with student loan obligations.

 

Pure nonsense from a failed administration. 

Edited by sherpa
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sherpa said:

 

We have laws to stop it.

This administration chooses to not enforce those restraints for political reasons.

 

Same as the goofy strategy of buying votes by promising to strap the US taxpayer with student loan obligations.

 

Pure nonsense from a failed administration. 


He’s already doing student loan forgiveness by a different way. It’s happening like it or not. 
 

Call it failed all you want, it’ll be funny when he wins a second term because no one wants Dementia Don and his army of knuckle dragging Christian nationalists 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sherpa said:

We have laws to stop it.

 

This administration chooses to not enforce those restraints for political reasons.

 

Same as the goofy strategy of buying votes by promising to strap the US taxpayer with student loan obligations.

 

Pure nonsense from a failed administration. 

 

It's clear they either don't care or the talking points given to them are too powerful.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another question for the useful idiots screaming for new legislation...

 

What guarantees do we have that the executive branch will actually enforce the law under any new legislation that is passed?

 

I mean we have laws the the legislative branch already passed on the books and the executive branch simply will not enforce it. 

 

The answer is we don't have any guarantees because we know the democrats will just continue to do whatever is politically expedient.  Laws be damned.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Here's another question for the useful idiots screaming for new legislation...

 

What guarantees do we have that the executive branch will actually enforce the law under any new legislation that is passed?

 

I mean we have laws the the legislative branch already passed on the books and the executive branch simply will not enforce it. 

 

The answer is we don't have any guarantees because we know the democrats will just continue to do whatever is politically expedient.  Laws be damned.


Pass it and find out. 
 

 

We already know Abbott doesn’t want to follow the law and will hopefully pay the price for doing so

 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Pass it and find out. 
 

 

We already know Abbott doesn’t want to follow the law and will hopefully pay the price for doing so

 

Is there an article here explaining this with facts and figures? And our we talking about immigrants who legally come into the country or those who enter illegally?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

Is there an article here explaining this with facts and figures? And our we talking about immigrants who legally come into the country or those who enter illegally?

 

Any claim that illegal immigration is a net revenue positive for US taxpayer is pure lunacy.

Absolute lunacy.

 

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/shocking-cost-the-illegal-immigration-crisis-americans 

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

Any claim that illegal immigration is a net revenue positive for US taxpayer is pure lunacy.

Absolute lunacy.

 

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/shocking-cost-the-illegal-immigration-crisis-americans 


Heritage Foundation 😂😂😂😂 why would I listen to a neonazi group? 
 

 

Migrants buy things (sales tax) and often work under the table. They are a net tax positive. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Heritage Foundation 😂😂😂😂 why would I listen to a neonazi group? 
 

 

Migrants buy things (sales tax) and often work under the table. They are a net tax positive. 

 

Absolute horsecrap.

3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

 

Migrants buy things (sales tax) and often work under the table. They are a net tax positive. 

 

Absolute, complete horsecrap.

 

Take the cost of border enforcement. Add to it the cost associated with housing illegals and their healthcare, add to it the cost of deportation, which is all done by the wonderful US taxpayer, and present any reasonable argument that illegals  are a net positive.

 

The claim is preposterous.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

Absolute horsecrap.

 

Absolute, complete horsecrap.

 

Take the cost of border enforcement. Add to it the cost associated with housing illegals and their healthcare, add to it the cost of deportation, which is all done by the wonderful US taxpayer, and present any reasonable argument that illegals  are a net positive.

 

The claim is preposterous.

 

 

Now that I'm home and not on my phone at the office, I can give you better sources. 

 

Quote

Immigrants have a more positive net fiscal impact than that of native‐born Americans in most scenarios in the Updated Model and in every scenario in the Cato Model, depending on how the costs of public goods are allocated. The Cato Model finds that immigrant individuals who arrive at age 25 and who are high school dropouts have a net fiscal impact of +$216,000 in net present value terms, which does not include their descendants. Including the fiscal impact of those immigrants’ descendants reduces those immigrants’ net fiscal impact to +$57,000. By comparison, native‐born American high school dropouts of the same age have a net fiscal impact of −$32,000 that drops to −$177,000 when their descendants are included (see Table 31). Results also differ by level of government. State and local governments often incur a less positive or even negative net fiscal impact from immigration, whereas the federal government almost always sees revenues rise above expenditures in response to immigration. With some variation and exceptions, the net fiscal impact of immigrants is more positive than it is for native‐born Americans and positive overall for the federal and state/local governments.

 

 

https://www.cato.org/white-paper/fiscal-impact-immigration-united-states#historical-fiscal-impacts-1994-2018

 

Quote

Until the Immigration Act of 1924, everyone in the world was eligible to immigrate to the United States unless the government proved they fell into an ineligible category. In other words, innocent until proven guilty. Since then, the foundational principle of U.S. immigration law is that everyone in the world is ineligible to immigrate unless they prove to the government they fit into an eligible category. The result is that over 99 percent of all those wanting to immigrate to the United States cannot do so legally.

 

 

https://www.cato.org/blog/why-legal-immigration-nearly-impossible

 

Quote

Most available studies conclude that the unauthorized population pays less in state and local taxes than it costs state and local governments to provide services to that population.

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/110th-congress-2007-2008/reports/12-6-immigration.pdf

 

6 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

 

Putting treasonous, secessionist asswipes away is a good thing, actually. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sherpa said:

 

Any claim that illegal immigration is a net revenue positive for US taxpayer is pure lunacy.

Absolute lunacy.

 

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/shocking-cost-the-illegal-immigration-crisis-americans 

 

They're not here to think: they're here to parrot lies told to them.  It's costing us $150B annually to care for illegals.  You think they're providing even $150B and $1 in return?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...