Jump to content

"The Best NFL Offense that Can't Score Points" - Video Breakdown


BigDingus

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

I think thats definitely part of it

 

Our guys don't rank very well in terms of yards before contact which is why there's some disagreement wrt oline quality

 

The actual reasons are probably beyond my expertise😂😂

 

You and me both brother 😅

 

Even with all the analytical football content I consume, I'll admit I'm nowhere close to an expert on these things. As critical as we are of players or coaches, Ken Dorsey has more football knowledge in his pinky finger than I'll ever have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • BigDingus changed the title to "The Best NFL Offense that Can't Score Points" - Video Breakdown

It’s almost like some fans have said the static shotgun RPO (where Allen never actually keeps/runs the ball) isn’t working, especially when the Bills try to run outside with the atrocious blocking. 

 

Second drive of the Bengals game, the Bills run on 1st down, 2 yards. Get a pass interference, their shotgun run is blown up by DJ Reader for -1 yard, and then it’s pass, pass. 

 

So this is where the under center, play action, screen game to Cook conversation comes right back. 
 

Static 2x2 shotgun as Orlovsky has said. 
 

Edited by Straight Hucklebuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a really good video and I think it’s speaks in part to the disjointed nature of our offense. As some posters have said, it’s like we just pick our play calls randomly. They have no sequence or rhythm. It’s like we have 10 plays in a bag and we just reach in and grab them. 

2 minutes ago, HoofHearted said:

My favorite part was when he said we need to stop running zone schemes and instead copy schemes from teams who can actually run and then showed three clips of the Dolphins, 9ers, and Lions running zone schemes 😏.

Should have stuck with the stats analysis 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BigDingus said:

 

Just for those who are interested. Crazy to see how the Bills are ranked so highly in many offensive metrics, yet still so low in PPG the last 5 weeks.

 

Edit - 6:36 in the video is where it gets interesting, breaking down how EPA is the PROBABILITY of scoring points (which the Bills are ranked #2 in), and how the Bills are "the best team in the league at taking a theoretically strong field position after a big play, and totally squandering it."

 

#1 in yards per carry when running from under center. 

 

#24 in the league when running from shotgun... The shotgun run design being called the worst in the league. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was also Ironic that they showed the Colts as an example of teams that can run effectively out of shotgun; our guy Moss who most in Buffalo lamented as a bust, is surprise surprise, running effectively.  Now I'm not saying Moss is a world beater, but we should hold our judgments on some players before we can see how terrible the scheming this coaching staff is coming up with.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Billsturfwars said:

It was also Ironic that they showed the Colts as an example of teams that can run effectively out of shotgun; our guy Moss who most in Buffalo lamented as a bust, is surprise surprise, running effectively.  Now I'm not saying Moss is a world beater, but we should hold our judgments on some players before we can see how terrible the scheming this coaching staff is coming up with.

 

That segment was one of the most telling. Even though the Bills are objectively more successful running from under center, other teams also run prominently out of shotgun. The only difference is those other teams do so in more creative & confident ways, leading to their RBs still having success. 

 

We wasted 2 x 3rd round picks on Singletary & Moss, and a 2nd rounder on Cook, yet we still do nothing with these guys. We even traded away Moss + a 6th to get another RB in Hines, as if we had plans to utilize him in some unique way. Nope. 

 

Suddenly, Zack Moss is the 2nd leading rusher in the league, and with a team that runs from shotgun as well! With our QB & roster, RBs SHOULD have an easier time given that defenses prioritize defending the pass. Nope again!  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

5th in offensive points scored and 18th in total points is the takeaway

 

Bass w the entirety of his misses in the last 5games contributes I would imagine

 

 

 

Man you will just not give up this EPA garbage.  You are going to die on that hill.  The last 5 weeks we have not been scoring.  There are 3 games that we scored big propping up that "5th in offensive points."  The team needs to be consistently better.  At this point they are consistently average.  

 

What did Bass miss, twice?  Yeah, I am sure that 6 points is really contributing.

Edited by Scott7975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

Man you will just not give up this EPA garbage.  You are going to die on that hill.  The last 5 weeks we have not been scoring.  There are 3 games that we scored big propping up that "5th in offensive points."  The team needs to be consistently better.  At this point they are consistently average.  

 

What did Bass miss, twice?  Yeah, I am sure that 6 points is really contributing.

How is it garbage lol, it's just more confirmation 

 

If it was garbage you'd expect a delta between offensive EPA and offensive production

 

Instead we have Bills offense 5th in offensive points scored and 3rd in EPA over the last 5 weeks

 

That's very consistent 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

How is it garbage lol, it's just more confirmation 

 

If it was garbage you'd expect a delta between offensive EPA and offensive production

 

Instead we have Bills offense 5th in offensive points scored and 3rd in EPA over the last 5 weeks

 

That's very consistent 

 

Yes, consistently bad.  Try watching the games instead of the stat board.  They do nothing all game and then get a couple scores in the 4th quarter.  That is not good. Scoring 14, 18, 20 are 3 weeks of the last 5.  That is below average. That is not good by any means. 24 and 25 in the other two weeks is just barely top 10 average. 

 

I'd like to see the work that we are 5th in offensive points scored over the last 5 weeks.  Maybe I am wrong but I don't believe it until I actually see the work on it.  Haven't had time to watch the video yet.  Maybe its in there.  I just have a hard time believing it when we are 20th in average ppg over the last 5 weeks.  Even over the last 3 we are 13th which is barely above average.  

 

If you watch this team and think this offense is consistently good at scoring then I'd like some of what you are smoking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scott7975 said:

 

Yes, consistently bad.  Try watching the games instead of the stat board.  They do nothing all game and then get a couple scores in the 4th quarter.  That is not good. Scoring 14, 18, 20 are 3 weeks of the last 5.  That is below average. That is not good by any means. 24 and 25 in the other two weeks is just barely top 10 average. 

 

I'd like to see the work that we are 5th in offensive points scored over the last 5 weeks.  Maybe I am wrong but I don't believe it until I actually see the work on it.  Haven't had time to watch the video yet.  Maybe its in there.  I just have a hard time believing it when we are 20th in average ppg over the last 5 weeks.  Even over the last 3 we are 13th which is barely above average.  

 

If you watch this team and think this offense is consistently good at scoring then I'd like some of what you are smoking.

So you haven't watched the video in the OP and even if you did, wouldn't believe the data that's being presented? 

 

 

3 minutes ago, JerseyBills said:

we need to dominate the broncos and get this crazy week over with. We're on the cusp of exploding on O

I think folks are way more down on the team's prospects than is necessary rn 👍👍

 

There's enough reasons to believe they can turn things around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

How is it garbage lol, it's just more confirmation 

 

If it was garbage you'd expect a delta between offensive EPA and offensive production

 

Instead we have Bills offense 5th in offensive points scored and 3rd in EPA over the last 5 weeks

 

That's very consistent 

Since you watched the video you would see why EPA is so high and why the issues aren't likely to change anytime soon. 

Edited by Jrb1979
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jrb1979 said:

Since you watched the video you would see why EPA is so high and why the issues aren't likely to change anytime soon. 

There are issues for sure, all phases

 

But again as far as predictive models go there is congruency between EPA and its constituent algorithms (and DVOA/dyar to a lesser extent imo) and what we see in actual terms re: the Bills

 

I like statistics...i don't think these models can fully capture the entirety of the NFL market but predictively they tend to be very accurate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, dave mcbride said:

The Bills’ o-line talent isn’t that bad and is in all likelihood better than average at the moment. They have no injuries, and lines across the league are in way worse shape because of injuries/mediocrity

This makes the drop-off % in our own pass rush getting home that much more glaring, unfortunately. (I know, I know, injuries, Von etc., but still)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

So you haven't watched the video in the OP and even if you did, wouldn't believe the data that's being presented? 

 

I might believe it.  Depends on what it is.  When I have time to watch it, I will watch it.  Until then, EPA doesn't match the eyeball.

2 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

There are issues for sure, all phases

 

But again as far as predictive models go there is congruency between EPA and its constituent algorithms (and DVOA/dyar to a lesser extent imo) and what we see in actual terms re: the Bills

 

I like statistics...i don't think these models can fully capture the entirety of the NFL market but predictively they tend to be very accurate

 

EPA in a nutshell is predicting scoring chance per drive right?  I don't find that to be very accurate if we score high but rarely score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...