Jump to content

Sound of Freedom movie


Recommended Posts

It’s honestly bizarre that some in mainstream media want to categorize a movie about stopping a very real issue, in child sex trafficking, as “fringe” or QAnon.  
 

It shouldn’t be controversial. 
 

Yet here we are…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Starring Jim Caviezel, who previously starred in a Mel Gibson film about an unmarried 30-something cult leader who spent a lot of time around children and prostitutes. 
Groomer!

So should I put you down for being pro groomer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Starring Jim Caviezel, who previously starred in a Mel Gibson film about an unmarried 30-something cult leader who spent a lot of time around children and prostitutes. 
Groomer!

You know how you find The Bee neither clever nor funny?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

The film, which is based on a true story, centers on a federal agent who rescues a boy from captivity in South America. When he finds out that the boy’s sister was left behind, he quits his day job and embarks on a thrilling extraction mission to get her out. As action movies go, it follows a formula that was once common in Hollywood (you know, before all the woke stuff), leading to movies like Taken and Tears of the Sun.

 

It all seems straightforward enough, right? What’s controversial about a movie portraying the saving of a girl from human traffickers? According to the press, you’re just too stupid to figure it out because what the movie is really about is QAnon.

 

{snip}

 

 

So to clarify, there’s no mention of Hillary Clinton in the movie nor is there any mention of any motivation related to QAnon, pizzagate, or the like.

Yet, according to the left-wing press, the movie is actually secretly promoting QAnon in a way that “normals” just can’t perceive.

 

I’ve got one question for this reviewer: Is QAnon in the room with you right now?

 

 

This is the problem with negative partisanship. It melts brains. The lesson of Sound of Freedom isn’t that there’s some secret QAnon plot that has made it a success.

 

It’s that people tend to like more traditional, morally straightforward narratives in movies. That’s not a commentary on religion in films, but rather that a stark presentation of right and wrong tends to make people feel good and want to watch. That’s why Extraction 2, the recent Netflix release, was so well-received.

 

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2023/07/07/surprise-movie-hit-sound-of-freedom-leaves-the-left-freaking-out-about-qanon-n772636

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F0cr3W1agAAFYsN?format=jpg&name=large

 

.

 

.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, SCBills said:

It’s honestly bizarre that some in mainstream media want to categorize a movie about stopping a very real issue, in child sex trafficking, as “fringe” or QAnon.  
 

It shouldn’t be controversial. 
 

Yet here we are…

They’re against it because of the LGBT community’s guilty conscience of being groomers…

 

 

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These pervey alt libs folk are so weird.  Should round them all up and send them to an island with the teachers and pedo priests they love to talk about so they can be weird together in seclusion away from the rest of us trying to have a society 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...