Jump to content

Shout out to Isaiah Hodgins


RenoNVBillsfan

Recommended Posts

Gotta shout out to my guy Isaiah Hodgins. Back-to-back games with receiving TD’s. Feel for the dude having to deal with the putrid passing ability of Daniel Jones. The guy hasn’t passed beyond 200 yards in the past 2 games. 56.5 QBR for the season. Imagine the red zone threat he could have been had the Bills retained him. After watching McKenzie be less than inspiring this season, I still believe the Bills cut the wrong Isaiah. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RenoNVBillsfan said:

After watching McKenzie be less than inspiring this season, I still believe the Bills cut the wrong Isaiah. 

 

Except Isaiah McKenzie is a speed slot WR, gadget player, return man and Isaiah Hodgins is a tall outside WR that doesn't play Special Teams. They'd never cut McKenzie for Hodgins. They basically play two different positions.

 

If anyone was getting cut for Hodgins, it would have been Jake Kumerow. But when healthy he's also a very solid Special Teams player.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Except Isaiah McKenzie is a speed slot WR, gadget player, return man and Isaiah Hodgins is a tall outside WR that doesn't play Special Teams. They'd never cut McKenzie for Hodgins. They basically play two different positions.

 

If anyone was getting cut for Hodgins, it would have been Jake Kumerow. But when healthy he's also a very solid Special Teams player.

 

Jake Kumerow is a solid blocking WR something  Isaiah Hodgins has never shown.

 

The Jiants appear to be a team on rise waiting for a QB like Bills were when Coach McD took over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Except Isaiah McKenzie is a speed slot WR, gadget player, return man and Isaiah Hodgins is a tall outside WR that doesn't play Special Teams. They'd never cut McKenzie for Hodgins. They basically play two different positions.

 

If anyone was getting cut for Hodgins, it would have been Jake Kumerow. But when healthy he's also a very solid Special Teams player.

uuum.. no. McKenzie is NOT a return man. He’s simply too small for that (arms aren’t long enough to safely protect the football upon contact). You’ll only see him if 3 other return guys go down to injury. He can’t run precise routes, nuts up under contact or contested catch attempts and can’t block ..well.. ME! I don’t care what anyone else thinks, he shouldn’t be on the team. I’d much prefer playing against him over with him.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

uuum.. no. McKenzie is NOT a return man. He’s simply too small for that (arms aren’t long enough to safely protect the football upon contact). You’ll only see him if 3 other return guys go down to injury. He can’t run precise routes, nuts up under contact or contested catch attempts and can’t block ..well.. ME! I don’t care what anyone else thinks, he shouldn’t be on the team. I’d much prefer playing against him over with him.

 

Okay, but it's something he's done and could do. Even if you remove that from his repertoire, the point is moot. Isaiah Hodgins for Isaiah McKenzie is not something that would happen as they are completely different WR's that line up and play completely differently.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Okay, but it's something he's done and could do. Even if you remove that from his repertoire, the point is moot. Isaiah Hodgins for Isaiah McKenzie is not something that would happen as they are completely different WR's that line up and play completely differently.

I agree, very different.

Hodgins catches the ball.  McKenzie doesn’t.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Except Isaiah McKenzie is a speed slot WR, gadget player, return man and Isaiah Hodgins is a tall outside WR that doesn't play Special Teams. They'd never cut McKenzie for Hodgins. They basically play two different positions.

 

If anyone was getting cut for Hodgins, it would have been Jake Kumerow. But when healthy he's also a very solid Special Teams player.

 

Hodgins could be a big slot.  Something that we could use right now. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Okay, but it's something he's done and could do. Even if you remove that from his repertoire, the point is moot. Isaiah Hodgins for Isaiah McKenzie is not something that would happen as they are completely different WR's that line up and play completely differently.

He had one good return against Miami 2 years ago but in reality, he's a liability back there. The coaching staff doesnt trust him anymore hence the Hines trade. Mackenzie's only use is a gadget play but even those havent been working. To me, Mackenzie has lost his right to start with the amount of drops and boneheaded plays. Time to give Shakir a chance.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our #2 WR the last 5 weeks:  24 receptions, 245 yards, 2 TDs.

 

A former Bill who the Giants picked up off of waivers the last five weeks: 17 receptions, 183 yards, 2 TDs.

 

Happy for him and I have never been in the "meh, he can't block or play special teams, dump him" camp.

 

No way am I saying that IH is better than GD (although the comments after this will no doubt claim that's what I am saying).  It's just frustrating what is going on with this team, especially at that position that is so critical to making our system go.

 

Give me an "incomplete" or "alternative skill deficient" receiver who is a good size and can catch [EDIT]...every time, because I don't think Josh Allen stays awake at night wondering if his receivers can tackle on kickoffs. 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you’re not playing ST’s as a WR 5 or whatever you won’t make this roster. Simple as that. Good for Hodgins, but he’s hardly some tonic for the offense. I think the staff wanted to see more from him that never materialized. 

Edited by Boatdrinks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chandler#81 said:

uuum.. no. McKenzie is NOT a return man. He’s simply too small for that (arms aren’t long enough to safely protect the football upon contact). You’ll only see him if 3 other return guys go down to injury. He can’t run precise routes, nuts up under contact or contested catch attempts and can’t block ..well.. ME! I don’t care what anyone else thinks, he shouldn’t be on the team. I’d much prefer playing against him over with him.

I'm done with the McKenzie experience as well. Give me John Brown or Shakir in the slot. With Brown and Diggs on the field at the same time, either can go deep or across the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

If you’re not playing ST’s as a WR 5 or whatever you won’t make this roster. Simple as that. Good for Hodgins, but he’s hardly some tonic for the offense. I think the staff wanted to see more from him that never materialized. 

 

 

Very respectfully, BD, that is about important to me as "if you didn't practice this week you can't play on Sunday" and "you can't lose your job to injury."

 

I don't care if a guy actually helps the opposing team on special teams as long as the guy they are going to be paying 45 million dollars trusts and finds him a few times a game for 1st downs and TDs I am comfortable with it.

 

...and the proof being that essentially a waiver wire walk-on being a productive part of any offense when he is not even remotely the main guy is a potentially valuable tool for any QB to have in his arsenal bag.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, hemma said:

I agree, very different.

Hodgins catches the ball.  McKenzie doesn’t.

 

And yet McKenzie is right behind Diggs for catch % with 69.1%, how can this be when he doesn't catch the ball?

Hodgins (when with the Bills) has a lower catch % with 66.7%, how can this be when he catches the ball "unlike McKenzie"?

(Hodgins has a better catch % with the Giants, so good for him!)

 

12 minutes ago, Luka said:

Still can't figure out what went into evaluating the receivers in the offseason. Hodgins, Shakir, Diggs and Davis would've made a hell of a group. 

 

You know Shakir gets ~16 snaps per game on average, right?  More vs Detroit, 12 yesterday.  He's been targeted 17 times and has 8 receptions.

 

I would have liked to see the Bills keep Hodgins.  I think it was bad luck as far as injuries at other positions that led to him being waived.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beck Water said:

 

And yet McKenzie is right behind Diggs for catch % with 69.1%, how can this be when he doesn't catch the ball?

Hodgins (when with the Bills) has a lower catch % with 66.7%, how can this be when he catches the ball "unlike McKenzie"?

(Hodgins has a better catch % with the Giants, so good for him!)

 

 

You know Shakir gets ~16 snaps per game on average, right?  More vs Detroit, 12 yesterday.  He's been targeted 17 times and has 8 receptions.

 

I would have liked to see the Bills keep Hodgins.  I think it was bad luck as far as injuries at other positions that led to him being waived.

 

I know he isn't getting enough snaps, yes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beck Water said:

 

So what is he doing in the snaps he gets, and with the targets he gets, which you can show to us as evidence he should be getting more?

 

It's all based on chemistry and trust, if Josh isn't given the opportunity to build those things with him, it will continue to be a stalemate. This isn't baseball, too many fans on this board with percentages and decimal points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...