Jump to content

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Biden's Corruption: $20M+ bribes. All the evidence that isn't evidence.


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Wacka said:

For the millionth time pea brain, you have no idea how trademarks or patents work.

I have my name on two Β patents. Know how much I made? 2 dollars. 2 Sacajewa dollars.

Β 

I have no idea what getting a patent in China has to do with anything?Β  It's not like it you can't get one if you have the money.Β  And you still have to sell product to make any money.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

What these morons simply don’t understand is that Biden was doing it BEFORE Trump even ran for President. As is often said….useful idiots!Β 

Β 

And tons here claim Trump is different. He's fighting the establishment.Β  He's for the People. He's for the working class.Β  And instead,Β  he was more of the same.Β 

Edited by cle23
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Doc said:

Β 

I have no idea what getting a patent in China has to do with anything?Β  It's not like it you can't get one if you have the money.Β  And you still have to sell product to make any money.

Β 

Can you imagine if Hunter worked at the White House and secured expedited Chinese trademarks?

Β 

You freaks would go ballistic.

Β 

Β 

Β 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

See my post above. They just protect rights in court. A patent allows you tp exclusively use Β your invention for 20 years. if someoneΒ makes and sells it without you paying you, you can stop them. Trademarks do the same with the look and name of products and business. Xerox, Kleenex and FedEx are examples. It costs money to get them. Β You have to establish a business Β first to Β sell the good or service. Where I worked, the company owned the patent and Β had to pay the people Β on the patent something,hence the $1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wacka said:

See my post above. They just protect rights in court. A patent allows you tp exclusively use Β your invention for 20 years. if someoneΒ makes and sells it without you paying you, you can stop them. Trademarks do the same with the look and name of products and business. Xerox, Kleenex and FedEx are examples. It costs money to get them. Β You have to establish a business Β first to Β sell the good or service. Where I worked, the company owned the patent and Β had to pay the people Β on the patent something,hence the $1.

Β 

I don't care what your thoughts are on the value of those patents.

Β 

Clearly those patents had value to Trump and Ivanka that they were fast-tracked while they were employed by the AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Β 

Β 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did you invent in your mom's basement? Β I could have gotten a patent while I worked for that company but I would have to prove thatΒ i didm't use any of their ideas equipment while doing it. Trump's kids Β were allowed to Β have their own businesses Β while working for the government.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BillStime said:


You didn’t seem to care when Trump did it.

Β 

Prove I didn't care.Β 

Β 

I know you're real big on proof these days so bring it.

Β 

I think they're both crooks and should be locked up in the same cell together.

Edited by reddogblitz
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BillStime said:

Β 

I don't care what your thoughts are on the value of those patents.

Β 

Clearly those patents had value to Trump and Ivanka that they were fast-tracked while they were employed by the AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Β 

Β 

Β 

You should have used your WIC card to invent something.Β  What a mess.Β  Β 

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BillStime said:


giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d783f9a01b9df5fb5eb3

Β 

1) You’re concerned about sources when you can’t even substantiate the latest conspiracy?

Β 

2) And when the cult does source,@BillsFanNCΒ shares a Tweet from a Qanon rat infested nut job KanekoaTheGreat?

Β 

lmao

Β 

Β 

It's not a conspiracy.Β  It's an investigation by the House of official corruption.

Β 

President Biden has claimed from the beginning he knows nothing of his son's business, never discussed his son's business, and never participated in his son's business.

However, there are over 1,000 e-mails where using various government issued e-mail aliases Joe communicated with his son and his business.Β  Proof his contention he didn’t know or discuss business with his son is false.Β  Along with this, sworn public witness testimony to the House committee that then VP Biden was either on the phone or in-person at business events with clients.Β  Clients where bribes and government influence where exchanged and agreed to between the firm and the clients. So another lie about not participating.Β  What's left is tracing the money trail back to the former VP.Β  Something the House committee likely has in their possession.

So Joe lied on 3 points and unless you can conjure up a good excuse used e-mail aliases to hide his identity.

A reasonable person would conclude this amounts to suspicious activity.Β  Β Along with this witness testimony collaborating the authenticity of the laptop contents.

What more do we need?

If anyone is waiting for DOJ or FBI to produce evidence they'll be disappointed to learn those agencies have spent all their time and effort to bury the evidence and make the story go away. Appointing a special counsel that has spent his time helping with that isn't going to produce any revelations.

Hardly a conspiracy but rather lots of facts, data, records, and information.

Β 

Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Wacka said:

What did you invent in your mom's basement? Β I could have gotten a patent while I worked for that company but I would have to prove thatΒ i didm't use any of their ideas equipment while doing it. Trump's kids Β were allowed to Β have their own businesses Β while working for the government.

Thank you! These critics are such useful idiots that they cannot imagine that there are people out there who actually do and create things for a living (besides hanging around ridiculous non-productive, money sucking governmental agencies).Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Wacka said:

See my post above. They just protect rights in court. A patent allows you tp exclusively use Β your invention for 20 years. if someoneΒ makes and sells it without you paying you, you can stop them. Trademarks do the same with the look and name of products and business. Xerox, Kleenex and FedEx are examples. It costs money to get them. Β You have to establish a business Β first to Β sell the good or service. Where I worked, the company owned the patent and Β had to pay the people Β on the patent something,hence the $1.

Β 

Wow, that's brutal. I used to complain about the $1k bonus I'd get when a patent was issued. It all came out in the wash eventually though. While some of my patents were behind products the company made a lot of money on, others made bupkis.Β 

Β 

We also signed away all our intellectual property ownership to the company. If I invented something in my garage while employed there, they still owned the IP.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Wacka said:

For the millionth time pea brain, you have no idea how trademarks or patents work.

I have my name on two Β patents. Know how much I made? 2 dollars. 2 Sacajewa dollars.

You changed the world though, and I thank you.Β 
Β 

1D203702-FC71-417D-957B-5EBEFB00389B.jpeg

F9B5DFBA-BC07-4041-95AF-69CD2CA8C797.jpeg

14 hours ago, Wacka said:

For the millionth time pea brain, you have no idea how trademarks or patents work.

I have my name on two Β patents. Know how much I made? 2 dollars. 2 Sacajewa dollars.

You changed the world though, and I thank you.Β 
Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It's not a conspiracy.Β  It's an investigation by the House of official corruption.

Β 

President Biden has claimed from the beginning he knows nothing of his son's business, never discussed his son's business, and never participated in his son's business.

However, there are over 1,000 e-mails where using various government issued e-mail aliases Joe communicated with his son and his business.Β  Proof his contention he didn’t know or discuss business with his son is false.Β  Along with this, sworn public witness testimony to the House committee that then VP Biden was either on the phone or in-person at business events with clients.Β  Clients where bribes and government influence where exchanged and agreed to between the firm and the clients. So another lie about not participating.Β  What's left is tracing the money trail back to the former VP.Β  Something the House committee likely has in their possession.

So Joe lied on 3 points and unless you can conjure up a good excuse used e-mail aliases to hide his identity.

A reasonable person would conclude this amounts to suspicious activity.Β  Β Along with this witness testimony collaborating the authenticity of the laptop contents.

What more do we need?

If anyone is waiting for DOJ or FBI to produce evidence they'll be disappointed to learn those agencies have spent all their time and effort to bury the evidence and make the story go away. Appointing a special counsel that has spent his time helping with that isn't going to produce any revelations.

Hardly a conspiracy but rather lots of facts, data, records, and information.

Β 

As I've been saying, they have far more to impeach Joke than they did against Trump when they impeached him over the phone call.Β  They just refuse to see it.Β  And they call MAGA a cult.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

Prove I didn't care.Β 


Just went thru a few of your 384 references to Trump. You spend a ton of time claiming not to have ever voted for him while at the same time bending over backwards defending the POS.

Β 

7 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

think they're both crooks and should be locked up in the same cell together.


They’re all fn crooks - but Trump take$ the cake hands down.Β 
Β 

Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Doc said:

Β 

As I've been saying, they have far more to impeach Joke than they did against Trump when they impeached him over the phone call.Β  They just refuse to see it.Β  And they call MAGA a cult.

Β 

You said this a lot, too:

Β 

On 2/13/2022 at 9:56 AM, Doc said:

This is what will end up being worse than Watergate.

Β 

On 2/15/2022 at 11:22 AM, Doc said:

Worse than Watergate, 9/11, WWII and January 6th combined.Β Β 

Β 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Doc said:

Β 

As I've been saying, they have far more to impeach Joke than they did against Trump when they impeached him over the phone call.Β  They just refuse to see it.Β  And they call MAGA a cult.

Β 

Oh they will see it.....eventually.... when the military boot crushes their balls. Until then they will remain useful idiots.

Β 

Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Lol.Β  βˆ†βˆ†βˆ†βˆ† this dude just spent time going throughΒ  replies like a stalkerΒ 

Β 

So much projection.Β 

Β 

You're right - I should have just done this:

Β 

image.thumb.png.97a75d844e00e48533b29d82d059cc7f.png

Β 

Instead of leveraging the search functionality and doing a simple search.

Β 

Idiots

Β 

Β 

Β 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...