Jump to content

[Edit] Jon Gruden resigns over controversial emails discovered in WFT investigation


flaz

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mango said:


It’s not patently false. In fact my company will clear your entire personal phone remotely the day you quit or get fired. 
 

It is server dependent. In order to connect to your Microsoft exchange server the general agreement gives your company full access, including texts. Your company may or may not take advantage of it. But you waive your right to privacy. 

Other guy was right. While you are correct the company can wipe your phone once you are registered with your company's O365 / intune on it, they CANNOT see your text messages or other personal items not included in the O365 suite. Its not a "your company may not, mine does" thing. It's literally not possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

 

Yep, the 2 year policy is just to clean up the server for space so people dont have profiles that are 20GB of junk sitting there. It isnt to protect the user or erase evidence.

 

The emails are still archived and saved elsewhere.

 

Same goes for text messages and your cellular phone provider. There is no policy with cellular providers how long they keep your text messages on their servers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I strongly disagree with the things Gruden said in those emails. I think it’s disgusting and I am not sticking up for him in any way. But I’m not sure I really agree with this, since it happened while he was working for another company (ESPN). Had it happened after he was hired by the raiders, I get it. 
 

I don’t really feel bad for him, and I don’t think this is “cancel culture” (I think most of “cancel culture” is just consequences for your actions anyway) since it was his employer that fired him without any real motivation from social media outcry (that I know of).

 

I think it was more that the NFL has made such a strong stance against racism/homophobia/etc. and felt they had to act on this or their words would look hollow and I definitely don’t think they want any protests starting up again. 

 

But I guess I just wonder if there was another way this could have been handled.

Like, send him for 100 hours of sensitivity training and fine him and/or take away a draft pick or something like that. 

Edited by BillsFan4
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillsFan4 said:

I strongly disagree with the things Gruden said in those emails. I think it’s disgusting. But I’m not sure I really agree with this, since it happened while he was working for another company (ESPN). Had it happened after he was hired by the raiders, I get it. 
 

I don’t really feel bad for him, and I don’t think this is “cancel culture” (I think most of “cancel culture” is just consequences for your actions anyway) since it was his employer that fired him without any real motivation from social media outcry (that I know of).

 

I think it was more that the NFL has made such a strong stance against racism/homophobia/etc. and felt they had to act on this or their words would look hollow and I definitely don’t think they want any protests starting up again. 

 

But I guess I just wonder if there was another way this could have been handled.

Like, send him for 100 hours of sensitivity training and fine him and/or take away a draft pick or something like that. 

 

He resigned, wasn't fired.

 

Maybe he'll go to the University of Alabama Coaching Rehabilitation Program.  Works for cases of bad playcalling, alcoholism, why not calling the most powerful figure in your profession a f*g?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillsFan4 said:

I strongly disagree with the things Gruden said in those emails. I think it’s disgusting. But I’m not sure I really agree with this, since it happened while he was working for another company (ESPN). Had it happened after he was hired by the raiders, I get it. 
 

I don’t really feel bad for him, and I don’t think this is “cancel culture” (I think most of “cancel culture” is just consequences for your actions anyway) since it was his employer that fired him without any real motivation from social media outcry (that I know of).

 

I think it was more that the NFL has made such a strong stance against racism/homophobia/etc. and felt they had to act on this or their words would look hollow and I definitely don’t think they want any protests starting up again. 

 

But I guess I just wonder if there was another way this could have been handled.

Like, send him for 100 hours of sensitivity training and fine him and/or take away a draft pick or something like that. 

 

He didnt even get fired. He resigned because he knew he could no longer show his face in that locker room as a supposed Leader. He canceld himself twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrDawkinstein said:

 

He didnt even get fired. He resigned because he knew he could no longer show his face in that locker room as a supposed Leader. He canceld himself twice.

 

For all of Gruden's faults he's displaying a lot more self-awareness at this point than like 99% of head football coaches ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LeviF said:

 

For all of Gruden's faults he's displaying a lot more self-awareness at this point than like 99% of head football coaches ever.

 

Ha, true. I guess that is one way of looking at it. Although that must mean the bar is really low. Not giving him much credit for it tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

He didnt even get fired. He resigned because he knew he could no longer show his face in that locker room as a supposed Leader. He canceld himself twice.

After a talk with the owner. I guess I just assumed he “resigned” (as in, the owner forced it). I can’t imagine Gruden willingly left $60 million on the table. I heard the owner was under immense pressure from the NFL to fire him. They wanted it done before Sunday’s game.

Edited by BillsFan4
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillsFan4 said:

After a talk with the owner. I guess I just assumed he “resigned” (as in, the owner forced it). I can’t imagine Gruden willingly left $60 million in the table. I heard the owner was under immense pressure from the NFL to fire him. They wanted it done before Sunday’s game.

 

I'm sure he had a talk with Davis and was told "we can do this the easy way, or the hard way". He ultimately willingly left $60M on the table and saved himself the bad optics of having to fight for it in court after all this.

 

Gruden has made plenty of money. Probably already sitting on over $50M. That's enough to "fall back on" when something like this comes out.

 

It was already on the fence facing his players with the racial stuff. But the homophobic stuff when you have Nassib on the roster... unrecoverable. He had to walk away.

Edited by DrDawkinstein
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Well, he ultimately willingly left $60M on the table and saved himself the bad optics of having to fight for it in court after all this.

 

Gruden has made plenty of money. Probably already sitting on over $50M. That's enough to "fall back on" when something like this comes out.

 

It was already on the fence facing his players with the racial stuff. But the homophobic stuff when you have Nassib on the roster... unrecoverable. He had to walk away.

retirement doesn't suck. He and his millions will adjust...lol on the golf course. I pity him zero

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Muppy said:

retirement doesn't suck. He and his millions will adjust...lol on the golf course. I pity him zero

 

https://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/09/highest-paid-espn-jon-gruden-report-monday-night-football-jon-gruden-salary

 

ESPN's highest paid employee when he was there at $6.5M/year. Plus the $20M+ from his original coaching stint. Plus the $30M+ he already made on his latest contract.

 

I think I could survive.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

https://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/09/highest-paid-espn-jon-gruden-report-monday-night-football-jon-gruden-salary

 

ESPN's highest paid employee when he was there at $6.5M/year. Plus the $20M+ from his original coaching stint. Plus the $30M+ he already made on his latest contract.

 

I think I could survive.

I’m pretty sure Gruden will see a fair amount of the money remaining on his current contract with the Raiders.  They probably cut a deal, and agreed to pay him out through 2023 (or something like that) if he would agree to “resign”.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mannc said:

I’m pretty sure Gruden will see a fair amount of the money remaining on his current contract with the Raiders.  They probably cut a deal, and agreed to pay him out through 2023 (or something like that) if he would agree to “resign”.  

 

Knowing the history of the Davis family, I'll believe that when I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, machine gun kelly said:

I respectfully disagree.  I am not one to persecute someone from a snip it, but I wrote in the beginning of this thread there would be apologists, and two things.  One, if he wrote the one comment, he has more behind it and shouldn’t be condoned me didn’t care if it were 10 years ago.  I’ve spent my whole life trying to avoid people or walk out of the room from my own extended family member when they make what they think are innocent jokes etc.  it’s plain and simple racism, and in my opinion stupidity.

 

Stupidity as to make generalizations about a group based on a what they think is the norm is shortsighted as there is so much variability among any group, to generalize shows you’re not that smart, and/or jaded.  I’ve taught my sons and daughter do you want to sound stupid.  They would argue as teens, and I would counter, and give examples.  Inevitably, it took a lifetime of raising someone to make sure they have in their head if I make generalizations based on a cooor, ethnicity, religion, whatever, I sound stupid.  That’s my opinion and I don’t apologize for it.

 

Second, to put anything in writing you can’t defend in a court of law makes you additionally stupid.  I work in a highly regulated community in medical device sales.  25+ years ago I had a mentor tell me to use that as the litmus test.  Anything you write personally to a friend as a joke,  always be prepared to be on the witness stand and defend it.  It stuck with me from a young age.  I knew if Gruden was so brash to write one racist remark, more would come when the FBI is investigating everything.  I didn’t want to say it the other day, but I knew more would come.  It’s the FBI.  When they start an investigation, they will do a metaphoric colonoscopy on everything.  Hence going back to my courtroom litmus test.

 

Lastly, we all have buddies who send us off color jokes which could make you laugh and even just say raucous, not necessarily prejudiced, I had to stop as a new manager over 15 years ago.  I just told my buds, please take me off this list and put it in writing, not just called them.  I wanted it in writing showing I didn’t condone it.  I then followed up with a call, and verbalized my concerns in a light way.  The whole list stopped as they were all new managers promoted and didn’t think about the ramifications of what they thought were innocent funny jokes.  That’s the world we live in and been that way for a very long time.  This isn’t something new in the last five years.  

 

Anyway, I don’t feel sorry for the guy, I think he’s a racist, sexist, homophobic idiot, who thinks he is above reproach and that pervasive attitude just bit him in the butt.  I won’t feel sorry if anyone else in the NFL has the same track record.  That’s not cancel culture, it’s not being tolerant of the good old boy culture.  There’s no place for it in corporate America nor has there been for decades.

 

If you disagree, that is you’re position.  We’ll agree to disagree.

 

 

 

Excellent post!   Back in the Stone Age when I was in junior high (I graduated from college almost 50 years ago ), the general rule was to never commit to paper what you wouldn't want your mother to read.   In the modern world with emails and social media tweets and posts stored out in the ether,  that rule is a thousand times more important.   What you put out there, even if it's "personal", never disappears even after you hit the delete button ... and the more incriminating it is, the more likely it is that somebody will save it/forward it/publish it somewhere and that at some point in the future it will come back around and bite the originator in arse.    Ask all the teenagers who have had their sexting material become public.

 

People have always been held accountable for their opinions, including opinions that were once acceptable/popular that are no longer respectable.  During the Great Depression, thousands of intellectuals and disillusioned young people joined socialist or Communist organizations.  In the 1950s, many of those older and wiser people found themselves out of their jobs and unable to get new ones. 

 

Finally, there is no excuse for bigotry.  It is hateful whether it's based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or place of origin.  Most of us struggle with aspects of it because we live in a diverse, rapidly changing world in which what decent people of our parents' generation believed/accepted/tolerated isn't what decent people of our own age believe/accept/tolerate or what decent people today want their children to believe/accept/tolerate.  Individuals frequently embrace bigotry in order to have somebody to blame for their own personal failures and insecurities.   Bigotry certainly is not a political belief although some unscrupulous politicians and political talking heads use it to further their agendas. 

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Knowing the history of the Davis family, I'll believe that when I see it.

It will never be public, but it’s highly unlikely that Gruden just resigned without being paid a significant amount of the money that would have been due.  If the Raiders had fired him, he probably would have had a good argument that they were on the hook for the remaining six years.  And the way the team is going this year, Gruden would have been on the hot seat anyway after the season. So Davis probably ends up saving a lot of $, even though he’s paying out $10 million or so in “severance”.

Edited by mannc
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...