Jump to content

Texas (again)


Recommended Posts

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

I'm sorry.  I'm just trying to make sure that I comprehend your question.  The "they" to whom you refer is your crowy pals, is that correct?  I can't possibly begin to answer your question if I don't know the identity of the "they" to which or whom you refer.  


I don’t know who they are.  You brought them up. 
 

Are you drunk….because you seem drunk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


I don’t know who they are.  You brought them up. 
 

Are you drunk….because you seem drunk. 

 

 

These posts clarify the issue, Chef Jim Crow.  

 

I posted:

 
"When some of your crowy pals try to take it away, these people fight to retain the right.  It should be simple to understand, even for you."


You responded:

 

"Awesome.   Explain how they are trying to take away right to vote.  
 

I’ll give you one shot."

 

I then asked:

 

“ 'They' being your crowy pals?"

 

So, this is simple, even for you.  Is the "they" to whom you referred your crowy pals?  Please don't make this any harder than it needs to be.  TwoBillsDrive turns its lonely eyes to you on this issue, Chef Jim Crow. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by SectionC3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

 

These posts clarify the issue, Chef Jim Crow.  

 

I posted:

 
"When some of your crowy pals try to take it away, these people fight to retain the right.  It should be simple to understand, even for you."


You responded:

 

"Awesome.   Explain how they are trying to take away right to vote.  
 

I’ll give you one shot."

 

I then asked:

 

“ 'They' being your crowy pals?"

 

So, this is simple, even for you.  Is the "they" to whom you referred your crowy pals?  Please don't make this any harder than it needs to be.  TwoBillsDrive turns its lonely eyes to you on this issue, Chef Jim Crow. 

 

 

 

 


No they are who YOU think are my crowy pals.  See that was your term not mine. 
 

Check and check-mate. 
 

Carry on troll. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


No they are who YOU think are my crowy pals.  See that was your term not mine. 
 

Check and check-mate. 
 

Carry on troll. 

 

I'm still a little confused by your crowy "logic."  Are the people to whom you refer not your pals?  Or are they pals of yours who are not crowy?  Please advise.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

I'm still a little confused by your crowy "logic."  Are the people to whom you refer not your pals?  Or are they pals of yours who are not crowy?  Please advise.  

 

 

 

I don’t know. I don’t have many pals in politics. At least not at this level. But you never know. Give me some names and I’ll let you know if we’re pals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

I don’t know. I don’t have many pals in politics. At least not at this level. But you never know. Give me some names and I’ll let you know if we’re pals. 

 

You're a confusing guy.  All I wanted to know was how you defined "they" for the purpose of your question.  Is the "they" the "your crowy pals" to whom I referred?  Because if it is, you have acknowledged having crowy pals.  So let's just start there.  Do you or do you not have crowy pals?

Edited by SectionC3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

You're a confusing guy.  All I wanted to know was how you defined "they" for the purpose of your question.  Is the "they" the "your crowy pals" to whom I referred?  Because if it is, you have acknowledged having crowy pals.  So let's just start there.  Do you or do you not have crowy pals?


I can’t answer that counselor.  Define crowy. 
 

Check and mate. 
 

You know you really suck at this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

I'm sorry.  I'm just trying to make sure that I comprehend your question.  The "they" to whom you refer is your crowy pals, is that correct?  I can't possibly begin to answer your question if I don't know the identity of the "they" to which or whom you refer.  

Comprehend this. How is the right to vote being taken away? Just trying to clear up any more confusion or misunderstandings between you two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Chef Jim said:


I can’t answer that counselor.  Define crowy. 
 

Check and mate. 
 

You know you really suck at this. 

 

Bottom line:  You asked/demanded that I "[e]xplain how they are trying to take away right to vote."  I asked you to clarify the "they" in your question.  You now say that you can't provide that clarification because you don't know who the they is.  Makes perfect sense, only to those who use Crow logic. 

 

And you want to be my financial adviser.  Not happening, sir.  

 

 

Just now, Devilmann said:

Comprehend this. How is the right to vote being taken away? Just trying to clear up any more confusion or misunderstandings between you two. 

 

There's no misunderstanding.  The Crow has to clarify his question/demand.  Because, as he knows, as he himself phrased the question/demand, he has acknowledged that he has crowy pals.  It's sad, I know, but there's a reason why this guy has earned the nickname Chef Jim Crow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Chef Jim said:


I can’t answer that counselor.  Define crowy. 
 

Check and mate. 
 

You know you really suck at this. 


Back and forth and Back and forth and Back and forth and Back and forth and 

 

We call this a “Get-a-room” score 6 points divided between you morans. Way to s—t it up guys!

 

MPPPGA

Edited by John Adams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

I’d take the L on this one and move on, @SectionC3.

 

Any W on this one is a fake one for the Crow.  Maybe he can brag about his Internet victory to his crowy pals when they next get together and complain about how it's too easy for black folks to vote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Any W on this one is a fake one for the Crow.  Maybe he can brag about his Internet victory to his crowy pals when they next get together and complain about how it's too easy for black folks to vote. 

Do you have any idea how utterly demeaning it is to African Americans to suggest they are either too stupid or too lazy to get an ID so that they can vote?  Who’s the blatant racist here? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Bottom line:  You asked/demanded that I "[e]xplain how they are trying to take away right to vote."  I asked you to clarify the "they" in your question.  You now say that you can't provide that clarification because you don't know who the they is.  Makes perfect sense, only to those who use Crow logic. 

 

And you want to be my financial adviser.  Not happening, sir.  

 

 

 

There's no misunderstanding.  The Crow has to clarify his question/demand.  Because, as he knows, as he himself phrased the question/demand, he has acknowledged that he has crowy pals.  It's sad, I know, but there's a reason why this guy has earned the nickname Chef Jim Crow.  

 

The they are the people that you and @BillStime are afraid are taking away people's right to vote.  So the they, from my perspective, is inconsequential.   See you know that but the troll that you are makes it important.

 

Anyway if you and @BillStime are so terribly worried about people losing a fundamental right in this country why are you here? Should you be on your way to GA, TX and elsewhere to fight this horrible denying of peoples' right to vote?   So either the right to vote isn't important to you or you're a troll?  Which is it counselor? 

 

Check and mate again.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The group of Texas state Democrats who ran from their jobs as legislators to the open arms of Democrats in Washington, D.C. is beginning to splinter. They have done all that they can do – secured meetings with senators to push passage of the For the People Act in the Senate, held press conferences, given interviews on friendly cable news stations, received glowing covering in the media, fundraised off their antics, and tweeted up a storm. Still, Biden will not grant them an audience. Frustration has set in.

 

During a Zoom conversation with U.S. Rep Lloyd Doggett of Austin, state Rep. Richard Peña Raymond of Laredo vented about the holdup.

“He won’t meet with us on Zoom like this, and I’m trying to be tactful, but I don’t know how else to say it, man. I’m just pissed off at this point. He doesn’t give us the respect the way you have,” Raymond told Doggett.

 

So far the biggest names they’ve secured meetings with are House Majority Whip James Clyburn and Kamala Harris. That seems like consolation prizes because Biden has no interest in wasting time with them.

 

We’ll try to “be tactful”, too, and say that the Texas Democrats’ vacation in D.C. has turned out to be a public relations disaster. Remember, they agreed to be useful idiots for national Democrats. They were sent to Washington to pressure senators to get on board with the For The People Act that is languishing in the Senate. Instead, a desperate Biden is focusing on the passage of infrastructure legislation.

 

https://hotair.com/karen-townsend/2021/07/24/texas-democrats-unravel-im-just-pissed-off-that-biden-wont-meet-with-them-n404321

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Texas Democrats Finally Begin to Realize They Are Screwed

 

You’d be forgiven for forgetting they existed, but the fugitive Texas Democrats, who fled their state to stop the passage of a mundane voting integrity bill, are still hanging out in Washington, DC. Where exactly, I’m not sure, but I like to imagine them sleeping on cots and eating ramen noodles every night while they mutter obscenities about Gov. Greg Abbott to each other.

 

That’s when they aren’t spreading COVID to everyone, of course. There was a sighting a few days ago in which some of them appeared with Al Sharpton at the MLK memorial. You know, because nothing stirs support in Texas like latching onto a notorious, big-city race grifter

 

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/07/30/texas-democrats-finally-begin-to-realize-they-are-screwed-n419129

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/22/2021 at 9:12 AM, SectionC3 said:

 

Any W on this one is a fake one for the Crow.  Maybe he can brag about his Internet victory to his crowy pals when they next get together and complain about how it's too easy for black folks to vote. 

You are very amusing...

Michael Jackson Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...