Jump to content

Random Political Thoughts Inc.


T&C

Recommended Posts

 

 

36 YEARS AGO TODAY, REAGAN UTTERED HIS MOST POWERFUL WORDS: ‘Mr. Gorbachev, Tear Down This Wall!’

 

 

tear2-2.jpeg

 

More than just a speech, Reagan’s words presented an America determined to allow the world’s nations to embrace freedom. Not through war but via a robust American military to create mutually assured destruction, bankrupting the USSR, and constant offers of peace; compare that to foreign policy today:

 

https://lidblog.com/36-years-ago-reagan-uttered-his-most-powerful-words-mr-gorbachev-tear-down-this-wall-2/

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the money printing before and after Covid and a proxy war we're winning at the expense of one of our biggest enemies (and by their doing), the Fed seems to have threaded the needle:

 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/inflation-report-points-to-fed-pause-at-june-meeting-economists-say-the-fed-is-getting-what-it-wants-171059338.html

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

                                                   ca2e182401cf44a2a961a79228720efc6a4f8145

 

 

 

.

i think that's called a nonsequitor but I need to look it up.  Isn't everyone but pedophiles, against pedophiles?  Mark me down as against.  That was dumb

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

i think that's called a nonsequitor but I need to look it up.  Isn't everyone but pedophiles, against pedophiles? 

 

 

No.

 

Thats the problem.

 

Open your eyes.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


This doesn’t even make sense 

 

It makes perfect sense.

 

To those without blinders on.

 

 

.

  • Agree 3
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No.

 

Thats the problem.

 

Open your eyes.

 

 

 

 

It makes perfect sense.

 

To those without blinders on.

 

 

.


Ohhh it’s more made-up persecution complex from the right, got it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Ohhh it’s more made-up persecution complex from the right, got it. 

Na, just pointing out the corporate/1% funded Authoritarians in the mix.

 

and how they use social justice topics as the avenue for the statist ideology they support and promote nonstop.

 

it is what it is. 

 

tell us more about how "WE" will be living in 15-minute cities again.   the story where we all share everything. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

 To be confused on what the comic was clearly showing is an indictment of your and Roundy not the comic. 


It doesn’t even make sense as the Nazi party wanted to eradicate most if not all of the groups in the first panel. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


It doesn’t even make sense as the Nazi party wanted to eradicate most if not all of the groups in the first panel. 

The nazis eradicated who they didn't agree with, for a multitude of narratives/reasons.

 

Just like most authoritarian statist governments.

 

But always came back to total state control.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

The nazis eradicated who they didn't agree with, for a multitude of narratives/reasons.

 

Just like most authoritarian statist governments.

 

But always came back to total state control.

 

 

The key to your post is "State control".

 

Dictators, authoritarians, and ideologies can be centered around a single figure or a group such as a political party, sometimes both.  Whether Fascists, Communists, Socialists, Monarchies, Theocracies, or whatever other system they claim to represent, all must crush any dissent and competition to their rule. 

They require control of the "messages" transmitted through media (both State and Private) providing their subjects (you are no longer a citizen here) with information. 

They require the ability to censor, block, or discredit any conflicting messages.  No alternative interpretations of events and "facts" are allowed. 

They directly and indirectly control the ability of subjects to be rewarded or punished by economic, political, and social means. 

They require a State monopoly on violence to maintain their rule through fear and intimidation, and in some cases death.  In cases where they maintain the illusion of choice, they hold control  over the electoral process which "rubber stamps" their rule. 

Importantly, they don't recognize the concept of "rights".  No subject has rights, rather they are granted privileges by the State.  Privileges that can be granted or taken away from people based on their allegiance and obedience to the State. 

Some outlaw of reject the religious concept of God.  Not because they don't believe but because under their system there can be no greater power than the power of the State.  Therefore, God cannot be allowed to exist.  

 

How close or far away are we from a system aligned around the principles of authoritarian rule? 

 

That's subject to a lot of interpretations.  But if the following assessment resonates with your perspective you probably feel its closer than most think.  "We are ruled by a government that is corrupt and self-serving, dominated by two political factions that pretend to be at odds with each other all the while moving in lockstep to maintain the status quo".  A status quo where their power grows and your freedoms shrink.  As such liberals are not the enemies of conservatives and conservatives are not the enemies of liberals.  Despite all the bickering and debate about marginal social issues.  The "deep state" holds a firm grip on the core.  The enemy is the institutions and systems of our Federal government.  And while they tell us that Russia, China, Iran, and a host of other external foreign enemies are the biggest threat to our democracy and freedoms the true threats are right there in plain site.  Sitting in the seat of power in DC.    

 

 

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The key to your post is "State control".

 

Dictators, authoritarians, and ideologies can be centered around a single figure or a group such as a political party, sometimes both.  Whether Fascists, Communists, Socialists, Monarchies, Theocracies, or whatever other system they claim to represent, all must crush any dissent and competition to their rule. 

They require control of the "messages" transmitted through media (both State and Private) providing their subjects (you are no longer a citizen here) with information. 

They require the ability to censor, block, or discredit any conflicting messages.  No alternative interpretations of events and "facts" are allowed. 

They directly and indirectly control the ability of subjects to be rewarded or punished by economic, political, and social means. 

They require a State monopoly on violence to maintain their rule through fear and intimidation, and in some cases death.  In cases where they maintain the illusion of choice, they hold control  over the electoral process which "rubber stamps" their rule. 

Importantly, they don't recognize the concept of "rights".  No subject has rights, rather they are granted privileges by the State.  Privileges that can be granted or taken away from people based on their allegiance and obedience to the State. 

Some outlaw of reject the religious concept of God.  Not because they don't believe but because under their system there can be no greater power than the power of the State.  Therefore, God cannot be allowed to exist.  

 

How close or far away are we from a system aligned around the principles of authoritarian rule? 

 

That's subject to a lot of interpretations.  But if the following assessment resonates with your perspective you probably feel its closer than most think.  "We are ruled by a government that is corrupt and self-serving, dominated by two political factions that pretend to be at odds with each other all the while moving in lockstep to maintain the status quo".  A status quo where their power grows and your freedoms shrink.  As such liberals are not the enemies of conservatives and conservatives are not the enemies of liberals.  Despite all the bickering and debate about marginal social issues.  The "deep state" holds a firm grip on the core.  The enemy is the institutions and systems of our Federal government.  And while they tell us that Russia, China, Iran, and a host of other external foreign enemies are the biggest threat to our democracy and freedoms the true threats are right there in plain site.  Sitting in the seat of power in DC.    

 

 

Omg…this was just after a post on the left’s perpetual victimhood. This post is bordering on paranoia, much less victimhood. Get some help.

 

btw, modern monarchies havent crushed opposition altho king edward was aligned with hitler for a while. 
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6635225

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Omg…this was just after a post on the left’s perpetual victimhood. This post is bordering on paranoia, much less victimhood. Get some help.

 

Open your eyes, man. You can't be this dumb. Billsy, yes he is that dumb, Tibs, yes as well.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

Open your eyes, man. You can't be this dumb. Billsy, yes he is that dumb, Tibs, yes as well.

I’m more concerned about the alphabet companies spying on me. But not that concerned. I’m an open book. And sometimes it’s helpful, albeit scary, to get ads on cameras when the nite before I was talking to my wife about cameras. 

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

I’m more concerned about the alphabet companies spying on me. But not that concerned. I’m an open book. And sometimes it’s helpful, albeit scary, to get ads on cameras when the nite before I was talking to my wife about cameras. 

Now that is true.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Omg…this was just after a post on the left’s perpetual victimhood. This post is bordering on paranoia, much less victimhood. Get some help.

 

btw, modern monarchies havent crushed opposition altho king edward was aligned with hitler for a while. 
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6635225

Nobody else reacting seems to feel that way.  Maybe you're walking around with your eyes closed?  Or you depend on the system for your livelihood?  

 

As for modern monarchies, I suggest you travel to to Saudi Arabia with the intent of establishing a DEI program to get some firsthand experience on how a modern monarchy would handle that idea? 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Nobody else reacting seems to feel that way.  Maybe you're walking around with your eyes closed?  Or you depend on the system for your livelihood?  

 

As for modern monarchies, I suggest you travel to to Saudi Arabia with the intent of establishing a DEI program to get some firsthand experience on how a modern monarchy would handle that idea? 

Good point.  Queen Rania says "Hi"

 

 

https://www.hellotravel.com/stories/most-beautiful-royal-princesses-in-world

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

:lol:

 

@redtail hawk

 

"I'm not worried. I'm in their club. They'd NEVER come for me....."

Public enemy #1.  “Intelligence agencies are flouting the law and buying information about Americans that Congress and the Supreme Court have made clear the government should not have.” 

 

https://www.wired.com/story/odni-commercially-available-information-report/

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

:lol:

 

@redtail hawk

 

"I'm not worried. I'm in their club. They'd NEVER come for me....."

I know some very good people in small town and county politics.  Have met a few national figures once or twice.  Was once called on to revive someone who passed out from heat at a Clinton rally (Bill was there supporting Hillary).  Getting emails answered from my Senator is not "being in the club".  But, no.  I've got nothing to hide and I'm certainly not worried about the Biden admin coming after me.  Now, If trump wins...

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Farley with his trademark eyeroll. Trump doesn’t recognize right or wrong, just what he can get away with and what’s best for him. I see that as a threat. 

Good God man, what planet do you live on? You've just accurately described the Biden administration. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some hopeful news I never expected to read.  Speak MAGA but act middle of the road.  Great idea.

 

https://www.semafor.com/article/06/16/2023/jd-vance-the-senates-maga-dealmaker

 

“We hear from the same people. We’re working on this together. We have very few differences on it, almost none,” said Brown, Vance’s co-sponsor on rail safety. “His most important job, in my opinion, is to deliver 15 or so Republicans here.”

That job requires him to speak MAGA in the conservative media world, where Vance has been an eager attack dog. His collaboration with Brown began even after he’d taken a prominent role bashing President Biden’s response to the rail disaster and complaining that the administration was “talking about how we have too many white-male construction workers” instead of fixing it.

The railway safety bill has gotten most of the attention; it’s got the best and earliest chance of passage. But Vance has also joined forces with Minnesota Sen. Amy Kobuchar on preventing catalytic converter theft; with Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren on getting guardsmen and reservists earlier access to healthcare; with Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly on speeding up manufacturing starts in rural areas; and with Warren, again, on clawing back executive compensation when banks fail.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Why Democrats Won’t Debate Anymore

by Derek Hunter

 

If you don’t use a muscle for a while it will atrophy to the point of uselessness. The same goes for the brain, which is why it’s important to engage in mentally challenging activities every now and then – anything from reading or a game of Trivial Pursuit to watching Jeopardy or engaging in a vigorous debate.

 

That last one, by the way, is the easiest and most fun, because talking to people is fun. Liberals, however, gave up on the concept of debate a while ago, and now are incapable of it (and not just because their ideas are horrible failures).

 

Flip on MSNBC and you not only won’t see a debate, you won’t see a serious discussion. Rachel Maddow, on the rare days she works for her $30 million (tell me again about the evils of capitalism), does not speak to anyone who disagrees with her. In fact, MSNBC does not employ anyone who disagrees with the progressive orthodoxy, no matter how absurd it is. Michael Steele, the former RNC Chairman, and every other “conservative” they keep on staff to trot out to pretend to have Republicans on their network sit silently on issues like pretending boys are girls and sterilizing them. No sane person, let alone conservative, can sit silently on this absurd concept, yet silent they sit and hammer their checks.

 

NBC has a gay news platform called “NBC Out,” because news apparently has a sexuality. It appears to only hire gay reporters who, quite coincidentally (I’m sure), find ***** or trans-phobia under every rock. That might have something to do with the silence of their “Republicans,” who want to keep those checks rolling in.

 

To be fair, they also have news platforms based on race – NBC Asian-American, NBCBLK (black people news), NBC Latino, etc. – because not only did Democrats create segregation, they love it dearly to this day. The left never changes their objectives, only their tactics. Today’s racism is couched as “tolerance” and “celebrating” things that don’t matter.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2023/06/20/why-democrats-wont-debate-anymore-n2624679

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."  - Oppenheimer

 

Robert Oppenheimer was not a member of the Communist Party, but he was a "fellow traveler" who agreed with many of its goals1. New evidence has emerged that demonstrates that he had been a Communist but had not been a spy2. Oppenheimer's long-time membership in the Communist Party of the United States was made secret in 1942 because he was being used as a Soviet intelligence asset by the Communist Underground to help obtain atomic secrets

 

Will be interesting to see if Hollywood vilifies him or makes him a saint.  as much of the world sees us dropping those bombs as war crimes.

 

guessing he will be the hero

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

 "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."  - Oppenheimer

 

Robert Oppenheimer was not a member of the Communist Party, but he was a "fellow traveler" who agreed with many of its goals1. New evidence has emerged that demonstrates that he had been a Communist but had not been a spy2. Oppenheimer's long-time membership in the Communist Party of the United States was made secret in 1942 because he was being used as a Soviet intelligence asset by the Communist Underground to help obtain atomic secrets

 

Will be interesting to see if Hollywood vilifies him or makes him a saint.  as much of the world sees us dropping those bombs as war crimes.

 

guessing he will be the hero

 

 

 

 

 

 

the director said it will leave questions.  Joe McCarthy is portrayed so I expect the communist question will be addressed

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...