billsfan1959 Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I'll post what I want. You can play whataboutism all you want. Be my guest. You have the right to believe that armed individuals, forcibly stopping vehicles that drive through a public area and killing an eight year old girl is insignificant compared to two people arming themselves on their own property against a mob. Pretty much sums up who you are. 9 minutes ago, LeviF91 said: The McCloskeys were absolutely in the right and frankly would have been in the right had they squeezed off a few rounds into that crowd. Don't @ me. In Tibs' world, two white people arming themselves on their property is something intolerable, while killing children is ok, as long as it is the right people doing the killing Edited July 21, 2020 by billsfan1959 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: It's ok to point guns at people? MO Title 38, Chapter 563: A person may, subject to the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person A person shall not use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section unless: . . 3. Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 7 minutes ago, LeviF91 said: MO Title 38, Chapter 563: Defending themselves? Why, because they are white and there is a war on them? 12 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said: Be my guest. You have the right to believe that armed individuals, forcibly stopping vehicles that drive through a public area and killing an eight year old girl is insignificant compared to two people arming themselves on their own property against a mob. Pretty much sums up who you are. In Tibs' world, two white people arming themselves on their property is something intolerable, while killing children is ok, as long as it is the right people doing the killing They are aiming guns at people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 Just now, Tiberius said: They are aiming guns at people. I know Tibs. And we all understand how much more traumatic that is for you than the shooting and killing of an eight year old girl. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 2 hours ago, LB3 said: Honest question. Do you think the McCloskey's were in the wrong? ***** (rhymes with duck) YES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Defending themselves? Why, because they are white and there is a war on them? Because a mob of the same people who've been burning their city for six years showed up on their private property. Everyone keeps telling white folks to reflect on their whiteness and figure out what to do moving forward. Well it's happening and I'm not sure your ilk is going to get the results they were looking for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 (edited) what they did was ILLEGAL. They also doctored film to make it look as if the peaceful protesters broke the gate when in fact they did not. This couple has a LONG history of being A holes !!! They destroyed property belonging to a church / place of worship and teaching in an adjoining property Edited July 21, 2020 by SlimShady'sSpaceForce 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: ***** (rhymes with duck) YES Not the rioters who broke into their neighborhood? I'm guessing you'd let them destroy your home and have a go at your wife, in the name of communi...errr... justice. Edited July 21, 2020 by LB3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 3 minutes ago, LeviF91 said: Because a mob of the same people who've been burning their city for six years showed up on their private property. Everyone keeps telling white folks to reflect on their whiteness and figure out what to do moving forward. Well it's happening and I'm not sure your ilk is going to get the results they were looking for. It was a protest. Should all protests be confronted with gun thugs? How Russian of you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, LB3 said: Not the rioters who broke into their neighborhood? I'm guessing you'd let them destroy your home and have a go at your wife, in the name of communi...errr... justice. READ THE TRUTH and not the truth the Borg Collective spreads They were not rioters AND they did not destroy the gate and break into their neighborhood. Do some research besides FAKE NEWS and ALTERNATE TRUTHS . com Edited July 21, 2020 by SlimShady'sSpaceForce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: REAR THE TRUTH They did not destroy the gate and break into their neighborhood. Do some research besides FAKE NEWS and ALTERNATE TRUTHS . com They were let into the neighborhood? By who? https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jun/30/what-we-know-about-st-louis-couple-who-pointed-gun/ Edit. I also never mentioned the gate in the post you quoted. Edited July 21, 2020 by LB3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: They were not rioters AND they did not destroy the gate and break into their neighborhood. Do some research besides FAKE NEWS and ALTERNATE TRUTHS . com So they never threatened the McCloskeys, or to burn the house or kill the dog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Gary M said: So they never threatened the McCloskeys, or to burn the house or kill the dog? If they went to his house and did the same, he probably wouldn't do a thing because most liberals are wussys with a capital P 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 14 minutes ago, LB3 said: They were let into the neighborhood? By who? https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jun/30/what-we-know-about-st-louis-couple-who-pointed-gun/ Edit. I also never mentioned the gate in the post you quoted. The Broken Gate was the reason they said they felt threatened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 Breaking: Missouri AG Files To Dismiss Charges Against McCloskeys: ‘I Won’t Stand By While Missouri Law Is Being Ignored’ by Hank Berrien Original Article On Monday, following the news that St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, the city’s top prosecutor, announced that Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who pointed guns at a crowd in front of their home, would be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a brief that would dismiss the charges. The brief stated that Schmitt “respectfully requests that the Court dismiss this case at the earlier possible opportunity.” “The right to keep and bear arms is given the highest level of protection in our constitution and our laws, including the Castle Doctrine, which provides broad rights to Missourians 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilzfancy Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Breaking: Missouri AG Files To Dismiss Charges Against McCloskeys: ‘I Won’t Stand By While Missouri Law Is Being Ignored’ by Hank Berrien Original Article On Monday, following the news that St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, the city’s top prosecutor, announced that Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who pointed guns at a crowd in front of their home, would be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a brief that would dismiss the charges. The brief stated that Schmitt “respectfully requests that the Court dismiss this case at the earlier possible opportunity.” “The right to keep and bear arms is given the highest level of protection in our constitution and our laws, including the Castle Doctrine, which provides broad rights to Missourians Is it any surprise that Gardner is a Soros backed attorney? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: The Broken Gate was the reason they said they felt threatened. Video showed the gate intact. They said they saw them break the gate. They also said the rioters threatened to burn their house down and kill their dog. You can believe the rioters. I'll believe the good citizens minding their business at home having dinner. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 5 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: The Broken Gate was the reason they said they felt threatened. Yeah, I'm sure a large crowd of protesters in a private residential area, that didn't exactly move past the McCloskey's house, and against the backdrop of many protests turning violent had nothing to do with them feeling threatened. BTW, you never answered my previous response to you: Where are your posts of outrage at the people in Atlanta that armed themselves, forcefully occupied private and public property, illegally stopped vehicles at gunpoint, shot several people, and, ultimately shot and killed an eight year old girl? Or are you like Tibs and feel all of that is ok as long as the "right people" are arming themselves and committing violence? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Breaking: Missouri AG Files To Dismiss Charges Against McCloskeys: ‘I Won’t Stand By While Missouri Law Is Being Ignored’ by Hank Berrien Original Article On Monday, following the news that St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, the city’s top prosecutor, announced that Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who pointed guns at a crowd in front of their home, would be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a brief that would dismiss the charges. The brief stated that Schmitt “respectfully requests that the Court dismiss this case at the earlier possible opportunity.” “The right to keep and bear arms is given the highest level of protection in our constitution and our laws, including the Castle Doctrine, which provides broad rights to Missourians Oh wow Levi was right again. All the way from Alaska @3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 21, 2020 Share Posted July 21, 2020 1 minute ago, LeviF91 said: Oh wow Levi was right again. All the way from Alaska @3rdnlng That has to have gone back a dozen years. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts