Jump to content

The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19


Hedge

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, shoshin said:

Trump’s maskless rallies and consequences thereof. 
 

 

 

The president has to meet people. The president has to travel. The president does not have to have parties and giant rallies with minimal protections in place. 
 

I wonder if Bailey got the Regeneron cocktail that Trump got for himself, Rudy, and Christie.  

This is a really terrifying story. Yikes! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, shoshin said:

 

Do you think we should minimize the virus and encourage big events? 

 

My friend Lehnard won't answer simple questions like this: How about you? 

 

 

Schools should be fully open yes.   

 

It's essential.

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shoshin said:

 

Here was the question: Do you think we should minimize the virus and encourage big events? 

 

 

 

 

Up to the locality yes. 

 

If you're under 40 why wouldn't you minimize it.

 

If you have a BMI less than 20 (we need to mandate bans on French fries) you have nothing to worry about. 

 

 

Edited by Big Blitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Up to the locality yes. 

 

If you're under 40 why wouldn't you minimize it.

 

If you have a BMI less than 20 (we need to mandate bans on French fries) you have nothing to worry about. 

 

 


Trump wasn’t holding U40 events, but keep playing dumb. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, shoshin said:


Trump wasn’t holding U40 events, but keep playing dumb. 

California (primarily Los Angeles county) is experiencing a ‘winter’ surge in cases. Trump didn’t come here and didn’t hold any rallies here. If a state with a population of almost FORTY MILLION people isn’t a big enough laboratory to blow your theory out of the water I don’t know what it will take. Political rallies didn’t cause this surge...no matter how much you want to blame everything on the President. 

Edited by SoCal Deek
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

California (primarily Los Angeles county) is experiencing a ‘winter’ surge in cases. Trump didn’t come here and didn’t hold any rallies here. If a state with a population of almost FORTY MILLION people isn’t a big enough laboratory to blow your theory out of the water I don’t know what it will take. Political rallies didn’t cause this surge...no matter how much you want to blame everything on the President. 

 

From what I've read, social gatherings amongst family and friends, in part caused by Covid fatigue, is the main driving factor behind the current surge.  There isn't a single cause, but multiple causes.  I heard one mayor saying in his city the driving factor in his city was big box stores and they were working with the stores to limit capacity.  Certainly, large numbers of maskless people close together for hours, as was the case for Trump rallies, could be a source of spread for the virus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Scraps said:

 

From what I've read, social gatherings amongst family and friends, in part caused by Covid fatigue, is the main driving factor behind the current surge.  There isn't a single cause, but multiple causes.  I heard one mayor saying in his city the driving factor in his city was big box stores and they were working with the stores to limit capacity.  Certainly, large numbers of maskless people close together for hours, as was the case for Trump rallies, could be a source of spread for the virus.

Since it’s widely accepted that the virus transmits from person to person it goes without saying that people gathered in close proximity would be the primary cause of a surge. Especially indoor gatherings. But, citing political rallies is just absurd. California is a heavily Democrat state (especially LA County) and Trump rallies simply didn’t happen here. Big box stores are an interesting theory but they’ve been open throughout the pandemic here. Grocery stores never closed and you can’t go in ANY of them without a mask. Everyone, I mean absolutely everyone, wears a mask here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Since it’s widely accepted that the virus transmits from person to person it goes without saying that people gathered in close proximity would be the primary cause of a surge. Especially indoor gatherings. But, citing political rallies is just absurd. California is a heavily Democrat state (especially LA County) and Trump rallies simply didn’t happen here. Big box stores are an interesting theory but they’ve been open throughout the pandemic here. Grocery stores never closed and you can’t go in ANY of them without a mask. Everyone, I mean absolutely everyone, wears a mask here. 

 

Why would it be absurd to cite political rallies?  Surely you can't believe that you couldn't get the virus at a political rally.  Are you so conceited to believe that since Trump didn't have a rally in California that people couldn't have transmitted the virus and his many rallies in Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Oklahoma etc?

 

I don't know how things have or haven't changed in California.  I know around here, indoor dining was not allowed, big box stores and grocery stores had capacity limits and lines in front of them, salons and gyms were closed.  Now all that is allowed, with some capacity limits on dining indoors and gyms.  I've also noticed an increase in social gatherings in homes and half masking in stores.  I'm not surprised that the virus is surging.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scraps said:

 

Why would it be absurd to cite political rallies?  Surely you can't believe that you couldn't get the virus at a political rally.  Are you so conceited to believe that since Trump didn't have a rally in California that people couldn't have transmitted the virus and his many rallies in Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Oklahoma etc?

 

I don't know how things have or haven't changed in California.  I know around here, indoor dining was not allowed, big box stores and grocery stores had capacity limits and lines in front of them, salons and gyms were closed.  Now all that is allowed, with some capacity limits on dining indoors and gyms.  I've also noticed an increase in social gatherings in homes and half masking in stores.  I'm not surprised that the virus is surging.

If this is really science then you have to start peeling away the obvious variables in order to solve the equation. (You remember that from junior high.) If there weren’t large political rallies in LA County, and there weren’t, then that clearly isn’t the nexus to the rise in cases. Citing them is done just to score some childish political point. I know conditions are different all over the country so I’m just giving observations from way out here in california ...which is a VERY large sample size! We don’t have indoor dining, and haven’t, and we’ve not seen any significant change in the number of people wearing masks in public. In fact, it’s absolutely shocking to see anyone without one. Things are different out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

If this is really science then you have to start peeling away the obvious variables in order to solve the equation. (You remember that from junior high.) If there weren’t large political rallies in LA County, and there weren’t, then that clearly isn’t the nexus to the rise in cases. Citing them is done just to score some childish political point. I know conditions are different all over the country so I’m just giving observations from way out here in california ...which is a VERY large sample size! We don’t have indoor dining, and haven’t, and we’ve not seen any significant change in the number of people wearing masks in public. In fact, it’s absolutely shocking to see anyone without one. Things are different out here.

I suggest you quit thinking in either/or ways.  Trump’s rallies caused outbreaks where he had rallies - Tulsa or the White House for examples.  California is likely due to Covid fatigue and improper in home meetings without masks.  Your desire to defend Trump to the death blinds you to reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

ATLANTA — Kyle McGowan, a former chief of staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and his deputy, Amanda Campbell, were installed in 2018 as two of the youngest political appointees in the history of the world’s premier public health agency, young Republicans returning to their native Georgia to dream jobs.

But what they witnessed during the coronavirus pandemic this year in the C.D.C.’s leadership suite on the 12-floor headquarters here shook them: Washington’s dismissal of science, the White House’s slow suffocation of the agency’s voice, the meddling in its messages and the siphoning of its budget.

 
ADVERTISEMENT

In a series of interviews, the pair has decided to go public with their disillusionment: what went wrong, and what they believe needs to be done as the agency girds for what could be a yearslong project of rebuilding its credibility externally while easing ill feelings and self-doubt internally.

“Everyone wants to describe the day that the light switch flipped and the C.D.C. was sidelined. It didn’t happen that way,” Mr. McGowan said. “It was more of like a hand grasping something, and it slowly closes, closes, closes, closes until you realize that, middle of the summer, it has a complete grasp on everything at the C.D.C.”

Last week, the editor in chief of the C.D.C.’s flagship weekly disease outbreak reports — once considered untouchable — told House Democrats investigating political interference in the agency’s work that she was ordered to destroy an email showing Trump appointees attempting to meddle with their publication.

The same day, the outlines of the C.D.C.’s future took more shape when President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. announced a slate of health nominees, including Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the chief of infectious diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital, as the agency’s new director, a move generally greeted with enthusiasm by public health experts.

“We are ready to combat this virus with science and facts,” she wrote on Twitter.

 

https://dnyuz.com/2020/12/16/like-a-hand-grasping-trump-appointees-describe-the-crushing-of-the-c-d-c/. 300,000 dead later 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

If this is really science then you have to start peeling away the obvious variables in order to solve the equation. (You remember that from junior high.) If there weren’t large political rallies in LA County, and there weren’t, then that clearly isn’t the nexus to the rise in cases. Citing them is done just to score some childish political point. I know conditions are different all over the country so I’m just giving observations from way out here in california ...which is a VERY large sample size! We don’t have indoor dining, and haven’t, and we’ve not seen any significant change in the number of people wearing masks in public. In fact, it’s absolutely shocking to see anyone without one. Things are different out here.

One issue that some folks here refuse to engage in is the hyperfixation on 'political rallies' v large scale protests and mass gatherings in support of political causes.   In spite of my disagreements with @oldmanfan, I think he's a good dude and a genuine rock star contributor here.  I read what he says, I assume he's a legit science PhDude.  Still, when we discussed these gatherings, his fall back is 'data'.  I get that, I really do, but it defies any logic at all that large scale gatherings that violate every recommendation to prevents the spread would not contribute to the spread of the virus on a massive level.  

 

  • People comingling and not adhering to social distancing recommendations;
  • Generally speaking, these are events predicated on emotional responses to injustice and social issues, by definition people are animated and engaged;
  • Folks from all walks of life come together in large numbers, from cool zones, hot zones and everywhere inbetween;
  • People do not spontaneously appear at these events, they all come from somewhere, and all come bring the shared commonalities of life--they enagage with others. 

 

Yet--silence, or better yet..."it's hard to say without the data about those specific events'.  

 

If we take that to the extreme, there has not been one study done that correlates the activity at my specific local church with super spreader events.   Not one.  No data exists, thus, it's impossible to say what might happen if I attend midnight mass in a week or two.  Same with my local hotspot and watering hole--not one data set from that locale.

 

It's one of the great mysteries of the pandemic.  To be completely honest, I wonder if the reason there was very little pushback on those sorts of mass gatherings, why Dr. Faucci was not railing against these massive super-spreader events was to encourage transmission of the virus.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

One issue that some folks here refuse to engage in is the hyperfixation on 'political rallies' v large scale protests and mass gatherings in support of political causes.   In spite of my disagreements with @oldmanfan, I think he's a good dude and a genuine rock star contributor here.  I read what he says, I assume he's a legit science PhDude.  Still, when we discussed these gatherings, his fall back is 'data'.  I get that, I really do, but it defies any logic at all that large scale gatherings that violate every recommendation to prevents the spread would not contribute to the spread of the virus on a massive level.  

 

  • People comingling and not adhering to social distancing recommendations;
  • Generally speaking, these are events predicated on emotional responses to injustice and social issues, by definition people are animated and engaged;
  • Folks from all walks of life come together in large numbers, from cool zones, hot zones and everywhere inbetween;
  • People do not spontaneously appear at these events, they all come from somewhere, and all come bring the shared commonalities of life--they enagage with others. 

 

Yet--silence, or better yet..."it's hard to say without the data about those specific events'.  

 

If we take that to the extreme, there has not been one study done that correlates the activity at my specific local church with super spreader events.   Not one.  No data exists, thus, it's impossible to say what might happen if I attend midnight mass in a week or two.  Same with my local hotspot and watering hole--not one data set from that locale.

 

It's one of the great mysteries of the pandemic.  To be completely honest, I wonder if the reason there was very little pushback on those sorts of mass gatherings, why Dr. Faucci was not railing against these massive super-spreader events was to encourage transmission of the virus.  

 

 

To the contrary I am sure the protests contributed, although I’d like to see here and after data in this cities to confirms. The issue I have with our SoCal friend is that he insists on trying to defend Trump by doing the “well, what about X or Y” defense.  It does not matter what others did, it matters what he did .  And encouraging rallies without masks especially in the White House was ridiculous

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldmanfan said:

To the contrary I am sure the protests contributed, although I’d like to see here and after data in this cities to confirms. The issue I have with our SoCal friend is that he insists on trying to defend Trump by doing the “well, what about X or Y” defense.  It does not matter what others did, it matters what he did .  And encouraging rallies without masks especially in the White House was ridiculous

 

Based on what we have been told, it's not that the protests 'contributed', it's that they would have served as giant incubators of the disease--a rolling, roiling boiling mass of COVID.  Again, I understand your desire for data based on your background, but I'm a simple humble businessman wondering where the %$#@ Tony Faucci was on this issue.  The way I see it, this issue is as much a failure of science and media complicity as anything else. 

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/dr-fauci-voices-concerns-coronavirus-spreading-amid-nationwide/story?id=71171103

 

Here's the guy and the write up from ABC news.  Just offering my opinion, I read this and think "What kind of bull#### is this?".  The way I see it:

 

  • We're all going to die if we don't stay home;
  • If we can't stay home, we're all going to die if we don't wear masks, social distance, and stay out of church;
  • Yet, massive gatherings of tens of thousands present from across the fruited plains:
    • "When you get congregations like we saw with the demonstrations," he continued, "that's taking a risk."
  • What the heck is this?  I take a risk standing in line at the Bills home opener.  Where the %$#^ is this:  "Listen, people will become infected, and people will die from events like this, it's inevitable.  STAY THE %$## AWAY!".;
  • In this article, the reporter seems to want to bend over backwards to minimize the risk.  Why?  Political gain;

 

Anyways, my point is simple--if you want skeptics to take you seriously, be bold and be serious.  He was serious, but tepid and impotent. 

 

As for Trump, I understand your perspective and certainly he shares blame for messaging.  However, had he been screaming from the top of his lungs for a lockdown, and then I witnessed the lack of any serious response to massive protests, I'd have  same concerns about bullshyt that I have today.  You're a data guy, I'm an observer of human behavior.  The messaging we're getting is all over the page, and while Trump was vocal about opening the economy, others were sounding alarms about what I might do while encouraging and supporting behavior that went against the grain. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

 

Question for the CDC:

 

"What intel on the virus were you given from China and the WHO from Dec 2019 thru January 2020?"

 

And second question...

 

"Why didn't Governors heed your warnings and shut these down?":

 

CDC warns George Floyd protests may be 'seeding event' for more coronavirus outbreaks

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/04/watch-live-cdc-official-testifies-in-house-hearing-on-us-coronavirus-response.html

 

So follow up question for the media.  In light of these warnings, why were you good with 10s of thousands of protesters in cities all across the country through June?

Suddenly, Public Health Officials Say Social Justice Matters More Than Social Distance

For months, health experts told Americans to stay home. Now, many are encouraging the public to join mass protests.

 

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/04/public-health-protests-301534

 

Also, were these always crisis actors?

 

download.jpeg

 

Yea sorry.  The CDC is right there with NBC in trustworthiness.  Start telling the truth not "your truths" then we can start taking you seriously again...

Edited by Big Blitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

Question for the CDC:

 

"What intel on the virus were you given from China and the WHO from Dec 2019 thru January 2020?"

 

And second question...

 

"Why didn't Governors heed your warnings and shut these down?":

 

CDC warns George Floyd protests may be 'seeding event' for more coronavirus outbreaks

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/04/watch-live-cdc-official-testifies-in-house-hearing-on-us-coronavirus-response.html

 

So follow up question for the media.  In light of these warnings, why were you good with 10s of thousands of protesters in cities all across the country through June?

Suddenly, Public Health Officials Say Social Justice Matters More Than Social Distance

For months, health experts told Americans to stay home. Now, many are encouraging the public to join mass protests.

 

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/04/public-health-protests-301534

 

Also, were these always crisis actors?

 

download.jpeg

 

Yea sorry.  The CDC is right there with NBC in trustworthiness.  Start telling the truth not "your truths" then we can start taking you seriously again...

CDC is bad, too huh? Along with all media, many Republicans, all Democrats, the FBI, the CIA, all the other intelligence agencies, social media companies, most every doctor, the judicial branch of government, local election officials, our democratic allies, NOAA  and anyone one else that ever dared to challenge any of Trump's many lies. Cult's think exactly like that 

 

 

It's kind of funny, some organization challenges Trump, he just blithely states that they hate him personally and can't be trusted, and his supporters just swallow that warm and whole. lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

CDC is bad, too huh? Along with all media, many Republicans, all Democrats, the FBI, the CIA, all the other intelligence agencies, social media companies, most every doctor, the judicial branch of government, local election officials, our democratic allies, NOAA  and anyone one else that ever dared to challenge any of Trump's many lies. Cult's think exactly like that 

 

 

It's kind of funny, some organization challenges Trump, he just blithely states that they hate him personally and can't be trusted, and his supporters just swallow that warm and whole. lol 

 

 

I think Trump has been lying to. 

 

I think Trump's lies about Covid occur somewhere between when he says "we saved 2 million lives" to "live your life don't let it scare you."  It can't be both. 

 

And, that we need 15 now 30 days to do....something that didn't work and no one is demanding answers.  No questions asked.  

 

 

His actions were correct but what to say publicly he was in a no win situation.  Now his opponents; not virology experts or scientists----political opponents which should also tell you why something very nefarious happened here.  Call it conspiracy I don't really care.  But his opponents say he should have took it more seriously.  In February when we had no deaths.  Or January when they love to say see he knew it was bad look what he told Woodward!  Who himself found the news so terrifying he told no one.  Must be some horrific virus huh?

 

If he closed down everything in February before we had 1 death it wasn't going to matter.  You know why?  Because it was everywhere and we couldn't stop anything.  Never.  For some reason, his political opponents; again not virologists or scientists think he should have shut it all down way earlier then he did.  Maybe before his impeachment vote?  

 

It was either going to do what it did slowly bc we hid for 3 months or eventually do what its doing now saturate the entire heartland and rebound bc people have weighed the risks and decided that they can't live like this anymore life has to go on.   

 

The mask distraction has always been b.s. Trump knew it I think they didn't anticipate so many people would be clamoring for them----not scientists or doctors (they got on board in May)---but his political opponents.  It's absolute a freedom issue bc if you can mandate and get compliance for that you can get it for ANYTHING.

 

They don't work.  As the planet opened back up bc people by and large understand data and refuse to live like this indefinitely with zero justification and constantly moving goal posts.  

 

 

And that is where EVERYONE either lied or f...ed up.

 

The minute 15 days was up it should have been full open let's see where it is.  We were lied to.  Twice.  Then 30 days.  OK and now it's becoming political.  Ok and now hospitals are empty.  Ok and now no one under 85 is dying at anywhere near an alarming rate and for that matter neither is anyone over 85.  Looking back at the numbers now from March thru October did it look really really bad?  Were we justified in living like that?

 

How ANYONE can believe ANYTHING they see from ANY politician on the left or right after this either doesn't care or they are just complete and total sheep.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It's one of the great mysteries of the pandemic.  To be completely honest, I wonder if the reason there was very little pushback on those sorts of mass gatherings, why Dr. Faucci was not railing against these massive super-spreader events was to encourage transmission of the virus.  

 

Probably because the administration did not let him go on shows like Meet The Press, Face The Nation etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, oldmanfan said:

I suggest you quit thinking in either/or ways.  Trump’s rallies caused outbreaks where he had rallies - Tulsa or the White House for examples.  California is likely due to Covid fatigue and improper in home meetings without masks.  Your desire to defend Trump to the death blinds you to reality.

What??  I didn’t defend Trump! I didn’t bring him into it at all. Sheeesh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the many shortcomings, and potential for shenanigans, of the response was the federal government's lack of requiring labs to have one consistent PCR testing cycle range and showing the quantitative result of the test to establish the patient's viral load at the time the specimen is retrieved.  Everyone is walking around not knowing what a negative or positive test truly means in terms of viral load, and I think that means a lot.

 

A positive and negative can be separated by a single cycle but you can remain quite infectious.  On the flip, you may be asymptomatic and think you've got a weak strain of it but your viral load, in reality, may be completely off the charts.  I think if people knew conclusively how infectious they were, they'd be more careful not to spread it around.  

 

Many other viral tests for EBV, HIV, etc. all test for viral load but when it came to COV-2, nope, it just had to be positive or negative.   When you had mono as a kid, the reason you stayed home from school for a week is that your viral load would generally decrease to a non-infectious level over that course of time.  You could conclusively know that via test.  With HIV, viral load IS the gold standard, it's an absolute need to know metric.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My MIL is a huge Trump supporter, but also an anti-vaxxer. As the Trump administration is pushing the vaccine and Pence is televising his own vaccination, watching her struggle is kinda funny.

 

The Pence Vaccination Holiday Special is pretty weird to me. Sorry if this has been talked about too much already, but I figured people would be commenting on it in this thread.

Does anyone else find it odd? Weird in an off-putting way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2020 at 8:02 PM, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Up to the locality yes. 

 

If you're under 40 why wouldn't you minimize it.

 

If you have a BMI less than 20 (we need to mandate bans on French fries) you have nothing to worry about. 

 

 

Here is why Einstein,

 

My parents live in a Senior Living Campus in WNY. The campus has been fortunate to keep the virus out until just recently. MANY of the residents have helping staff come in to help the residents - they are not employees of the center - but they are a vital cog of the ecosystem of these facilities.  My mother has dementia and needs help at almost everything - but she is not ready for memory care. My Dad cannot handle the dawn to dusk load of this and help comes in. Help is typically younger moms picking up some part time work.  The facility has been testing these incoming helpers on a weekly basis - but that doesn't guarantee anything. Recently an outbreak occurred in one of the wings...20 affected 3 dead. 

 

So post your graphs and make fun of medical care workers blowing off some steam....You clearly have the luxury of not having to think about the effects of this virus on your life - but know that your observations on what should be happening in our country are based on YOUR position. 

Edited by TH3
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, TH3 said:

 

 

So post your graphs and make fun of medical care workers blowing off some steam....You clearly have the luxury of not having to think about the effects of this virus on your life - 

 

 

My own kids falling behind in school.... their depression, anxiety, fear, and overall impact on their development that they can't get back while the privileged elite telework sure but otherwise this has no impact on my life correct.  

 

I have to work and teach 2nd and 6th grade this year.  It's going great!

 

My 8th and 9th graders look like they want to slit their wrists every day but it's awesome!  We're all in this together!

 

 

It's been a pleasure the last 4 months watching my said 2nd grader barely write because you know everything is computers bc the AI or just going to take over anyway.  

 

I take that back....occasionally she writes on a small white board and holds up answers the teachers don't really see or correct.  

Edited by Big Blitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TH3 said:

 

 

So post your graphs and make fun of medical care workers blowing off some steam....You clearly have the luxury of not having to think about the effects of this virus on your life - 

 

 

My own kids falling behind in school.... their depression, anxiety, fear, and overall impact on their development that they can't get back while the privileged elite telework sure but otherwise this has no impact on my life correct.  

 

I have to work and teach 2nd and 6th grade this year.  It's going great!

 

My 8th and 9th graders look like they want to slit their wrists every day but it's awesome!  We're all in this together!

 

 

Asynchronous "learning!"  Why do we even need teachers and Schools anymore???  This is just as good!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

My own kids falling behind in school.... their depression, anxiety, fear, and overall impact on their development that they can't get back while the privileged elite telework sure but otherwise this has no impact on my life correct.  

 

I have to work and teach 2nd and 6th grade this year.  It's going great!

 

My 8th and 9th graders look like they want to slit their wrists every day but it's awesome!  We're all in this together!

 

 

Asynchronous "learning!"  Why do we even need teachers and Schools anymore???  This is just as good!

So what you are saying is the answer to this is to let everyone get it, and while we are at it ....let's make fun of health care workers while we are at.

 

The complete AVOWED abdication and utter myopic incompetence of the Trump administration  has put both you, my parents and this country in places they should not be. 

 

But hey....Nothing like owning the libs with a sick burn like "At least they are 6 feet away" 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

My own kids falling behind in school.... their depression, anxiety, fear, and overall impact on their development that they can't get back while the privileged elite telework sure but otherwise this has no impact on my life correct.  

 

I have to work and teach 2nd and 6th grade this year.  It's going great!

 

My 8th and 9th graders look like they want to slit their wrists every day but it's awesome!  We're all in this together!

 

 

It's been a pleasure the last 4 months watching my said 2nd grader barely write because you know everything is computers bc the AI or just going to take over anyway.  

 

I take that back....occasionally she writes on a small white board and holds up answers the teachers don't really see or correct.  

And 3,700 people died of covid just yesterday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TH3 said:

So what you are saying is the answer to this is to let everyone get it, and while we are at it ....let's make fun of health care workers while we are at.

 

The complete AVOWED abdication and utter myopic incompetence of the Trump administration  has put both you, my parents and this country in places they should not be. 

 

 

 

1. My father is one of those health care workers in Buffalo.  He has repeatedly told me as if I don't know, its a serious virus, I've seen it, I know colleagues that got it........but we're not near capacity or any breaking point......we did what we were told.... what we're essentially doing is giving in to fear at this point.  In March I was very worried.  Not anymore. 

 

I wasn't "making fun" of them.  The point of that is to say if this was so devastating, we don't have time for this narcissistic nonsense that is not to relieve stress they're saying hey look at me despite this pandemic we have everyone thinking is overrunning our hospitals.  It isn't.  And fyi, they all should be Time's "Person of the Year."  They gave it to a career politician that did literally NOTHING and backed into becoming president.  Yes, I should take this all seriously.

 

 

2. Trump isn't to blame for the mitigation destroying 50 million kids.  When weighing the science and assessing risk....they need to be in school fully open.  Any teacher that doesn't want to work should be fired.  Lose year of pay (or more depending how long they want to do this) or demonstrate clear documented health risks and get a year off.  Why are ANY government employees still getting paid as they close down businesses and re arrange tax payer funded education to favor the elites, Google, Microsoft and the privileged without consent from the public?   But sure, I should be taking this seriously.  

 

 

I am.  Just not in ways the cower in your basement forever because I most definitely have a government job no spouse and/or kids in school crowd can even or is willing to comprehend.  

 

Kids aren't playing school sports?  Why?  Kids aren't at least at half capacity.  Why?   Where is the science that says they shouldn't be doing these things?  It should be up to them and their parents and if the concern is death, the math says they should continue to avoid grandma because the average age of death remains over 74 years old.  Their protection does not require shutting down society.  

Edited by Big Blitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

A question? No way. 

 

I was not commenting on the response. 

Tibs.....you posted a statistic without commentary. I assume it was meant as some sort of statement.  My question is a simple one....if you were in charge right now, what exactly would you do in light of that statistic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

Tibs.....you posted a statistic without commentary. I assume it was meant as some sort of statement.  My question is a simple one....if you were in charge right now, what exactly would you do in light of that statistic?

I'd start by telling the truth, which Trump has not. How many died because of his lies? Any guesses? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...