Jump to content

The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19


Hedge

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Well, the "msm" agrees with you and thought this was peachy keen. Not sure if this woman knows she is speaking to the President of the United States.
 

 

to be fair and with all due respect, he did not answer the question. he used whataboutisim to deflect.

Edited by Foxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gary Busey said:

 

Staff who were lucky enough to have them at Buffalo General were reusing the same N-95 masks until March 19th. 

 

Where have thousands died because of PPE shortage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, shoshin said:


In a circle of people whose business I know who have applied, none have received a dollar. Not evidence but just a data point. This includes by extension a relative who’s a Cpa that said all his clients are waiting. 
 

It’s a huge program and I’m not complaining. Just saying that they should be wary of patting themselves on the back too much. 

There just waiting for the results of the clinical trials before they actually help anybody... probably. 

Edited by Nanker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

There has been community spread throughout the country partly because hospitals were not prepared with PPE. Thousands have died.

 

Can you please point to me something, where "thousands have died" due to lack of PPE, masks or ventilators.   I would like to see that myself.  I haven't even seen that from the mainstream media and you know they'd be all over that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Has there been a credible claim that a patient died due to a lack of PPE? 


Hospital workers become patients because of poor PPE and patients get sick because of poor PPE. There’s a reason it’s so important. 
 

We can debate about whether certain politicians would have done more in Feb but we can’t debate that we didn’t do enough to prepare. Clearly we did not. Not just with PPE preparation but more so with planning and testing preparation. We lost an important month while downplaying the risks. 
 

You can blame Trump. You can blame Cuomo. Neither one gets a pass. 

Edited by shoshin
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Magox said:

 

Can you please point to me something, where "thousands have died" due to lack of PPE, masks or ventilators.   I would like to see that myself.  I haven't even seen that from the mainstream media and you know they'd be all over that.  

 

Where did I claim that #MAGA Ox?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TH3 said:

Trump is so small...he won't go to a hospital to see what is going on....but he will hold a presser everyday so the faithful can jagg off with him. 

 

Seriously....look at your posts from yesterday during the presser....could you have bigger boners? 

here, you might need this.

103435080-hand-holding-magnifying-glass-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

I said thousands have died. To assume zero of those had to do with PPE shortage is ignorant.

 

You said thousands died in a post about PPE shortages.  Explain the connection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

It's nice to see Trump getting out there and talking. Makes me feel confident of his defeat in November. A partisan rant while people are dying? That's not helping him at all. America is sick of this side show 

nah. America is sick of your ilk's side show.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

Where did I claim that #MAGA Ox?

 

I hadn't been on PPP for a while until recently.   I've now observed enough to know what you're about.

Just now, GG said:

 

You said thousands died in a post about PPE shortages.  Explain the connection. 

 

He can't

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, keepthefaith said:

 

I think the issues with testing in this country need to be better explained if they haven't already.  I've heard some things some from a local radio interview recently that mentioned some challenges here in the U.S. in terms of the variety of testing platforms we use in this country and that not all tests are compatible with all equipment and that some equipment is designed to handle higher test volumes than others.  Your linked article and other news outlets I've heard have parroted the report that WHO had a test and we chose not use it.  I can't imagine that such a test would have been readily available in the numbers we need and fully compatible with our testing network and that we would not use it at all.  If Germany developed a test in a week, the calculus could easily have been that we too can develop a test in a week or two that we can manufacture and source here in the numbers we need and that can be deployed with our test platforms.  That doing this would be faster than trying to source, deliver and deploy new testing equipment throughout the country.   That may have been a good calculus but when our test had problems, we had a setback.

 

South Korea also developed their own test and passed on the German/WHO test.  There has to be reasons why the world simply didn't overwhelming adopt that test.   

 

I'm not claiming we should've adopted WHO's test, rather the point is the information (genetic sequencing of the virus) was made available to create the test in early January.  I also posted a few days ago a link to research funded by DARPA published January 30th that suggested the R0 for the virus was twice the initial estimated range (which was 2-2.5).  

The information was readily available by the end of January that the virus was a serious threat, and some in the administration were sounding the alarm at that point (Navarro for example). As I commented in real time in the Trump Economy thread, it was very clear the economy/stock market was taking precedent over combating the virus.  As I commented then, you could see Trump finally took leadership on this after the market crashed March 16th, the day after the Fed dropped interest rates to zero (he commented that Sunday evening how Wall Street would be very happy--they were not). 

I even stated he finally looked presidential at that Monday afternoon presser.   Yes, yes, others were also late to the game, but to say Trump was focused on this from the beginning is spin.  Wall Street forced him to take it seriously March 16th.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TPS said:

I'm not claiming we should've adopted WHO's test, rather the point is the information (genetic sequencing of the virus) was made available to create the test in early January.  I also posted a few days ago a link to research funded by DARPA published January 30th that suggested the R0 for the virus was twice the initial estimated range (which was 2-2.5).  

The information was readily available by the end of January that the virus was a serious threat, and some in the administration were sounding the alarm at that point (Navarro for example). As I commented in real time in the Trump Economy thread, it was very clear the economy/stock market was taking precedent over combating the virus.  As I commented then, you could see Trump finally took leadership on this after the market crashed March 16th, the day after the Fed dropped interest rates to zero (he commented that Sunday evening how Wall Street would be very happy--they were not). 

I even stated he finally looked presidential at that Monday afternoon presser.   Yes, yes, others were also late to the game, but to say Trump was focused on this from the beginning is spin.  Wall Street forced him to take it seriously March 16th.

 

 

So you're saying that the CDC, NIH, Fauci and medical experts throughout the country were waiting for Trump to give them the green light to begin working on this?

 

Is that what you're implying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

As governors across the country fell into line in recent weeks, South Dakota’s top elected leader stood firm: There would be no statewide order to stay home.

Such edicts to combat the spread of the novel coronavirus, Gov. Kristi L. Noem said disparagingly, reflected a “herd mentality.” It was up to individuals — not government — to decide whether “to exercise their right to work, to worship and to play. Or to even stay at home.”

And besides, the first-term Republican told reporters at a briefing this month, “South Dakota is not New York City.”

But now South Dakota is home to one of the largest single coronavirus clusters anywhere in the United States, with more than 300 workers at a giant ­pork-processing plant falling ill. With the case numbers continuing to spike, the company was forced to announce the indefinite closure of the facility Sunday, threatening the U.S. food supply.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

You saw my response and know my intention. Don't be a DR.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, I don't know what your intentions is, other than tying two things together that didn't happen in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TPS said:

I'm not claiming we should've adopted WHO's test, rather the point is the information (genetic sequencing of the virus) was made available to create the test in early January.  I also posted a few days ago a link to research funded by DARPA published January 30th that suggested the R0 for the virus was twice the initial estimated range (which was 2-2.5).  

The information was readily available by the end of January that the virus was a serious threat, and some in the administration were sounding the alarm at that point (Navarro for example). As I commented in real time in the Trump Economy thread, it was very clear the economy/stock market was taking precedent over combating the virus.  As I commented then, you could see Trump finally took leadership on this after the market crashed March 16th, the day after the Fed dropped interest rates to zero (he commented that Sunday evening how Wall Street would be very happy--they were not). 

I even stated he finally looked presidential at that Monday afternoon presser.   Yes, yes, others were also late to the game, but to say Trump was focused on this from the beginning is spin.  Wall Street forced him to take it seriously March 16th.

 

One of the reasons Europe got hit so hard was because the tests they were depending on from China were very inaccurate. The experts said in the briefing yesterday that they were working on testing in February and we now have the best testing in the world. Other countries that were hit 3 weeks before us are asking for our tests. The administration’s effort and results on every front has been outstanding so far. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...