Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
BillsFan692

No Steve Tasker on NFL 100???

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, BillsFan692 said:

Whats that about?

 

how many bills players from that team do you think should be in the top 100?  I mean if tasker is in...

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many current players are going to make this list. At first thought, I figured a few and now that I’m really thinking about it, you are really probably only looking at Brady and Viniteri. There almost definitely won’t be anyone else unless you count coaches. 

  • Skeptical 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I wonder how many current players are going to make this list. At first thought, I figured a few and now that I’m really thinking about it, you are really probably only looking at Brady and Viniteri. There almost definitely won’t be anyone else unless you count coaches. 

Rodgers?

 

Brees?

 

Van Der Esch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

Rodgers?

 

Brees?

 

Van Der Esch?

Brees should be but my guess is he won’t be. Rogers certainly won’t be and shouldn’t be even close IMO

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

Rodgers?

 

Brees?

 

Van Der Esch?


Van Der Esch?  What?  Good LB but not in the Top 100 by a long shot.  At least not yet 

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus.  He really wasn't that great.  My God.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I wonder how many current players are going to make this list. At first thought, I figured a few and now that I’m really thinking about it, you are really probably only looking at Brady and Viniteri. There almost definitely won’t be anyone else unless you count coaches. 

I'd add Brees. I think he's top 5 all time and that should get it done as a QB.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Gugny said:

Jesus.  He really wasn't that great.  My God.

It’s silly to even include special teams players in the top 100 players of all time, but if you’re going to include them, Tasker is pretty widely thought of as the greatest special teams player of all time. As such, he should be on the list. 

  • Like (+1) 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

It’s silly to even include special teams players in the top 100 players of all time, but if you’re going to include them, Tasker is pretty widely thought of as the greatest special teams player of all time. As such, he should be on the list. 

 

Let them make a list of Top 100 Special Team Players and he can be on that.  There's probably 1000 players better than Tasker in the history of the NFL.  He was great at what he did, but let's not pretend he was a game changer.  Come on.

  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

Brees should be but my guess is he won’t be. Rogers certainly won’t be and shouldn’t be even close IMO

Rodgers is the greatest statistical QB of all time. It could be argued that he's the BEST QB of all time. I wouldn't make that argument because rings matter, but this is just insane. He's EASILY in the top 100. Almost feel like you may be kidding.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gugny said:

 

Let them make a list of Top 100 Special Team Players and he can be on that.  There's probably 1000 players better than Tasker in the history of the NFL.  He was great at what he did, but let's not pretend he was a game changer.  Come on.

Oh I’m with you. It’s silly to include ST players on this list. Especially, when thinking of all the great players you have to cut from the top 100 of all time to include them. It’s a disservice to all the great players from other position groups who were left off the list that contributed more to the game (e.g., Warren Sapp, JJ Watt, some of the great QBs and receivers that will inevitably be left off). But, if they are feeling the need to squeeze in ST players, Tasker should be near the top of the list. Just my opinion though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Rodgers is the greatest statistical QB of all time. It could be argued that he's the BEST QB of all time. I wouldn't make that argument because rings matter, but this is just insane. He's EASILY in the top 100. Almost feel like you may be kidding.


still take Favre over Rodgers

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks! (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Gugny said:

Jesus.  He really wasn't that great.  My God.


To me, it depends on what the list is meant for.  If it’s meant to be the top 100 players, regardless of position or fielding a team, then no he doesn’t. 
 

If you are fielding a team, then he deserves to be there for Special Teams.  

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

Oh I’m with you. It’s silly to include ST players on this list. Especially, when thinking of all the great players you have to cut from the top 100 of all time to include them. It’s a disservice to all the great players from other position groups who were left off the list that contributed more to the game (e.g., Warren Sapp, JJ Watt, some of the great QBs and receivers that will inevitably be left off). But, if they are feeling the need to squeeze in ST players, Tasker should be near the top of the list. Just my opinion though. 


Side note, has an active player even been named yet? Just curious. Outside of Watt or Fitzgerald,  I’m not sure how many come close. 
 

Update: Realized I’m completely bypassing the QBs when talking about current players. Obviously Brady is in. 

Edited by TheProcess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any non-Bills fans feel upset about his absence??

 

  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I wonder how many current players are going to make this list. At first thought, I figured a few and now that I’m really thinking about it, you are really probably only looking at Brady and Viniteri. There almost definitely won’t be anyone else unless you count coaches. 

 

There are plenty.

Russell Wilson will get in. Drew Brees, Ben Rothelisberger, possibly Eli Manning, JJ Watt, Khalil Mack , Von Miller, Gronkowski (considered current?), Aaron Rodgers, I could see Patrick Peterson getting in....

I may have missed on some, but there are way more than just Brees and Viniteri from this era going in.

Edited by 32ABBA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

I'd add Brees. I think he's top 5 all time and that should get it done as a QB.

Didn’t see this in my post. Forgot about Brees and Rodgers. Obviously Brady is in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, row_33 said:

Any non-Bills fans feel upset about his absence??

 

Might want to go to other teams' boards to poll this as I would assume the vast majority of board members here are non-non-Bills fans.

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

Rodgers?

 

Brees?

 

Van Der Esch?

Van Der Esch? Now that the cowboys know Sean Lee isn’t the best linebacker in history the media gloms on to this guy. Unbelievable. God, I hate the Cowboys almost as much as the Patriots.large.42C52E1F-9DD7-49F8-999E-64BD35A0F09C.gif.1648600dd8b9fe0654a4d8ed84452a33.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Gugny said:

Jesus.  He really wasn't that great.  My God.

He was a good special teams player but not a stand-out in the overall scope of an NFL game.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...