Foxx Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) 12 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Like I've said before... whenever a date is posted, know whatever happens it WON'T be on that date. She won't be too far off. :heavysigh: it appears that the 12th will indeed never arrive. reading the responses to her tweet, many of my same feelings are echoed. https://twitter.com/KelliJanssks/status/1183909269617418241 https://twitter.com/brent_skilton/status/1183890552770748416 https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1183915534699712515 Edited October 15, 2019 by Foxx 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 (edited) Does Barr have Mifsuds phone? Flynn's lawyers seem to think so. Edited October 15, 2019 by Chris farley 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 4 hours ago, Chris farley said: Does Barr have Mifsuds phone? Flynn's lawyers seem to think so. The multiple trips to Italy paid off. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Not a coincidence the Italian president is at the WH today. Though people assume Barr was the one who discovered the phone -- I wonder how much, if any, Pompeo played in that considering his spook ties and visits which preceded Barr's own. As UH points out: the very fact they have phones from Mifsud kind of is the kill shot to the narrative that he's a Russian IC asset, not our own. Of course we've known for three years this was true. And so could have/did the media who failed to report on it and gaslit the country about Mifsud being Russian. It was always a coup. Still is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 This is what fear reads like: Still pushing proven falsehoods -- because the narrative is all they have. Not facts. Not a mandate from the people. Not evidence of wrong doing... Just "narrative". Time's up. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 He hit the servers hard during the gaggle just moments ago (towards the end, don't have a time stamp but will get one) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 (edited) Edit: he just hit on this again in the Q&A session with the Italian President. Can't give a timestamp, or queue it up, as it's currently live: Edited October 16, 2019 by Hedge 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Hmm... coming from Forbes too... 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hmm... coming from Forbes too... Starting to wonder if this impeachment farce isn't actually about taking down Trump as it is setting up a deal to make things go away. Pelosi "Now Don, you know we are just kidding around with all this impeachment brouhaha, but the fact remains your guy Barr is making a lot of people in my party really nervous. If you could just make him bury what he's found and smooth this all over, we'll call off the "impeachment query" , not try to rig anything by having illegals and the dead vote, and let you thump our candidate in the election. How's that sound?" Trump "Know that job you have, being Speaker of the House? You're fired." 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 33 minutes ago, Gavin in Va Beach said: Starting to wonder if this impeachment farce isn't actually about taking down Trump as it is setting up a deal to make things go away. Pelosi "Now Don, you know we are just kidding around with all this impeachment brouhaha, but the fact remains your guy Barr is making a lot of people in my party really nervous. If you could just make him bury what he's found and smooth this all over, we'll call off the "impeachment query" , not try to rig anything by having illegals and the dead vote, and let you thump our candidate in the election. How's that sound?" Trump "Know that job you have, being Speaker of the House? You're fired." It's been pretty clear that the dems are frightened about the coming round-up of all the criminals in DC. This impeachment farce is nothing but an attempt by the dems to muddy the water, thus hiding the coming shitstorm. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 46 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: It's been pretty clear that the dems are frightened about the coming round-up of all the criminals in DC. This impeachment farce is nothing but an attempt by the dems to muddy the water, thus hiding the coming shitstorm. 1. Sure as hell hope SOMETHING BIG is coming; attempted coup of a sitting President is an egregious stain. 2. Sure as hell hope SOMETHING BIG happens with whatever is coming; this is the part I'm skeptical about (ie. a "kiss and make up trade off" ?). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 49 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: 1. Sure as hell hope SOMETHING BIG is coming; attempted coup of a sitting President is an egregious stain. 2. Sure as hell hope SOMETHING BIG happens with whatever is coming; this is the part I'm skeptical about (ie. a "kiss and make up trade off" ?). Its normal (and sane) to be worried about 2. Despite my own understanding and reassurances from some people involved, I’m still nervous about that outcome as it’s the most likely if you go by history. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Its normal (and sane) to be worried about 2. Despite my own understanding and reassurances from some people involved, I’m still nervous about that outcome as it’s the most likely if you go by history. ..PLENTY of concerns out there.....for me, especially with the fickle electorate......don't give a rat's azz what you may accuse me of.........BUT....I fear a significant portion being in favor of Warren because of "it's about time for a female President".....the mindless gender contingent regardless....so I'm a bigot...BFD..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 1 hour ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: 1. Sure as hell hope SOMETHING BIG is coming; attempted coup of a sitting President is an egregious stain. 2. Sure as hell hope SOMETHING BIG happens with whatever is coming; this is the part I'm skeptical about (ie. a "kiss and make up trade off" ?). Strzok is getting three years for FISA abuses. That's it. There'll be back room deals about retiring from public life (no books, no TV deals, just go away quietly). But Strzok is the sacrificial lamb that gets everyone else out of criminal charges. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Strzok is getting three years for FISA abuses. That's it. There'll be back room deals about retiring from public life (no books, no TV deals, just go away quietly). But Strzok is the sacrificial lamb that gets everyone else out of criminal charges. McCabe too. Can't only have one guy, because Strzok was too far down for a lone rogue agent. Need a conspiracy to sell it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: Strzok is getting three years for FISA abuses. That's it. There'll be back room deals about retiring from public life (no books, no TV deals, just go away quietly). But Strzok is the sacrificial lamb that gets everyone else out of criminal charges. Maybe. Trump though, is the wild card. I have no doubt the old adage of “mutually assured destruction” keeps a lot of dirty laundry hidden from the American people. I believe that Trump views this as exceptionally personal, and having not cut his teeth in the political realm, isn’t necessarily too concerned one way or the other what the collateral damage is. in addition, Barr seems quite perturbed with the swamp and I think he’s willing to kick a major player in the nuts with steel toed boots. At some point, I think a major player or two gets taken down. I think the reputation of several other players is tarnished, but a deal struck to minimize the real damage. Personally, I think Obama is up to his ears in scandalous behavior including trying to undo the election results of 2016. I think the analysis will be he is too big a fish to fry, and even if he was vulnerable, there’s a whole lot of downside to going after him too hard. then again, I often think that there really is just one major political power in the country, and photos like thus are why. Maybe you are right. Edited October 17, 2019 by leh-nerd skin-erd 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 11 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: okay, body language interpretation and I'll be right on of course because we know how it ends.... Notice Trump is the speaker pointing his finger (like a pistola) for emphasis telling Epstein that he's on to his sick ways, and when he become president, he is going to come after him. Epstein on the other hand takes a position of arrogance, smirk on his face (like you don't know *****), and arms crossed like you can't touch this...... As I said above, the rest is history now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 36 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: He's always kept questionable company. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 just something to keep note of. https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1183765281556049921 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 22 hours ago, Gavin in Va Beach said: Starting to wonder if this impeachment farce isn't actually about taking down Trump as it is setting up a deal to make things go away. The Democrats have no leverage, if this is their play. Sure, they can continue this secret inquiry nonsense for a time, but ultimately their ultra-left base will force Nasty Nancy to schiff or get off the pot with a vote. They damn well know that there is exactly a 0% chance the Senate will have 66 votes to convict. Frankly, I'm not convinced that the House Democrats have 200 (much less 218) votes to even pass Articles of Impeachment. Meanwhile, all they are doing is endangering the purple-district Democrats and pissing off Independents who are starting to see this nonsense as a waste of time - especially after the Russia hoax they perpetrated for nearly 3 years was pretty conclusively exposed and debunked. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 Blackberries? Are they looking for evidence from 1999? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 hour ago, GG said: Blackberries? Are they looking for evidence from 1999? I'd better hide my Palm Pilot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 macaroni? zitti? https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1185203418861723649 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 Strzok just puckered https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/19/us/politics/durham-review-fbi-witnesses.html 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Strzok just puckered https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/19/us/politics/durham-review-fbi-witnesses.html ..AG Barr and his lead prosecution Big Dawg seem to be straight shooters.....so should we expect to see a scathing, hard nosed report with prosecution recommendations(where would they go?) or a luke warm "report of findings" with an inference of "let's kiss and make up with bygones being bygones"?......what say you?.....is the alleged coup a "ruse"?... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 5 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ..AG Barr and his lead prosecution Big Dawg seem to be straight shooters.....so should we expect to see a scathing, hard nosed report with prosecution recommendations(where would they go?) or a luke warm "report of findings" with an inference of "let's kiss and make up with bygones being bygones"?......what say you?.....is the alleged coup a "ruse"?... Just finishing the Times article -- and there's a lot of wrong information in there (Durham has subpoena power as an example, and I'm 90% certain they've spoken to several Langley folk already but I have no way to confirm that). It seems like an attempt to get ahead of Durham's report. That implies to me that we're going to see something more than just scathing from Barr/Durham. But that's the million dollar question. There is a lot of chatter that the fear is no DC GJ would indict anyone on the left side of the aisle... which is why Huber has had three GJ's empaneled outside of DC. I'm still in the camp expecting charges to be brought against multiple people, starting with McCabe and Strzok -- likely reaching up to Comey and Yates with some middle men in between. We'll get the Horowitz report first, but Horowitz does not have the power to indict only refer people for indictments. That should be the canary in the coal mine so to speak. If Horowitz comes out with a report as thick as a telephone book but it's majorly redacted and lacks any referrals for criminal prosecutions -- then we are in a bit of trouble. If it's lightly redacted and there are a few referrals -- it shows we're on track for Durham to really bring the heat. I stand by what I've always said about not predicting a precise date -- but my spidey sense is tingling that we'll get the OIG report this coming week. Total guess on my part, not a prediction. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Just finishing the Times article -- and there's a lot of wrong information in there (Durham has subpoena power as an example, and I'm 90% certain they've spoken to several Langley folk already but I have no way to confirm that). It seems like an attempt to get ahead of Durham's report. That implies to me that we're going to see something more than just scathing from Barr/Durham. But that's the million dollar question. There is a lot of chatter that the fear is no DC GJ would indict anyone on the left side of the aisle... which is why Huber has had three GJ's empaneled outside of DC. I'm still in the camp expecting charges to be brought against multiple people, starting with McCabe and Strzok -- likely reaching up to Comey and Yates with some middle men in between. We'll get the Horowitz report first, but Horowitz does not have the power to indict only refer people for indictments. That should be the canary in the coal mine so to speak. If Horowitz comes out with a report as thick as a telephone book but it's majorly redacted and lacks any referrals for criminal prosecutions -- then we are in a bit of trouble. If it's lightly redacted and there are a few referrals -- it shows we're on track for Durham to really bring the heat. I stand by what I've always said about not predicting a precise date -- but my spidey sense is tingling that we'll get the OIG report this coming week. Total guess on my part, not a prediction. ...meh...no matter how damming or evidentiary exposes' show with recommended indictments, the voluminous report ends up to collect dust on the "so noted shelf".....not a damn thing will happen due to political cowardice.....yet we STILL pedal our "best democracy in the world" elsewhere as THE solution for other corrupt governments......ever heard of "the pot callin' the kettle black"?............ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 (edited) Barr (Durham) wants to interview a bunch of former spooks. an NBC article, ignore the spin... AG Barr expands mysterious review into origin of Russia investigation ... Justice Department officials have said that Durham has found something significant, and that critics should be careful. ... ... A Western intelligence official familiar with what Durham has been asking of foreign officials says his inquiries track closely with the questions raised about the Russia investigation in right-wing media. ... and this last ... “I’m very comfortable with everything I was involved in,” Brennan said. Edited October 19, 2019 by Foxx 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1185578048495718401 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 Fusion Ken, at it again. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/MattWolking/status/1186293882151231488 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 21, 2019 Share Posted October 21, 2019 FLOP SWEAT BUILDS AS IT SURE LOOKS LIKE THE BARR-DURHAM PROBE IS NOW A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. . 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Hedge said: Chuck is da man! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts