Jump to content

New York State abortion bill now allows babies, At any point of pregnancy, to be aborted


Beast

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

Having reheard the VA gov’s words, I now believe he was referring to children born ancephalic or something similarly severe. I think that makes a difference in how we string him up, even though I disagree. 

 

They mean abortion for any reason or demand under the sun

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LABillzFan said:

This just in...Democrats insist Northam MUST RESIGN!!

 

"If Covington students must pay for the sins of others, so must Northam!" they all yelled!!!

 

Only kidding.

 

Naturally, they're okay with what he did. At least the left is starting to remember their party was the party of slavery and the KKK.

 

 

but made a huge deal over what Kavanaugh did or didn't do in high school 40 years ago, are there any bigger hipocrites then liberals? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

I don’t know the total intention of the bill, I am only referring to the governor’s words.

 

His words mean the square root of sweet ***** all in the implementation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:

How did he get away with this over a close campaign?

 

 

The media didn't discover it, or - more likely - did and chose not to report it while they were busy castigating Kavanaugh for every childhood indiscretion.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

The media didn't discover it, or - more likely - did and chose not to report it while they were busy castigating Kavanaugh for every childhood indiscretion.

 

It’s farcical to attack someone for something over 30 years ago, but the Dems unleashed this whirlwind gleefully on innocent people when they had no evidence at all.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BringBackOrton said:

I don’t know the total intention of the bill, I am only referring to the governor’s words.

 

His words don't say that.  You're inferring it.  

 

I mean...you may very well be right.  But it's not what he said, and every defense so far is avoiding any such explanation of clarification of what he said.  So when he's going to such great lengths to defend what he said, I'm disinclined to give him the benefit of your doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

His words don't say that.  You're inferring it.  

 

I mean...you may very well be right.  But it's not what he said, and every defense so far is avoiding any such explanation of clarification of what he said.  So when he's going to such great lengths to defend what he said, I'm disinclined to give him the benefit of your doubt.

 

When the GOP speaks clearly the media and libs bring up dog-whistles and code-words

 

when a Dem speaks weasel-words we are told to accept it at face value, and it’s a total lie in the first place 

 

 

Edited by row_33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:

 

It’s farcical to attack someone for something over 30 years ago, but the Dems unleashed this whirlwind gleefully on innocent people when they had no evidence at all.

 

 

 

Yeah...I think this is pretty ***** stupid.

 

But it's not going to make me enjoy any less watching these grossly hypocritical *****heads get hoist on their own petards.  They sowed it, they can ***** reap it.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Yeah...I think this is pretty ***** stupid.

 

But it's not going to make me enjoy any less watching these grossly hypocritical *****heads get hoist on their own petards.  They sowed it, they can ***** reap it.

 

I’m 99 percent loving it

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

His words don't say that.  You're inferring it.  

 

I mean...you may very well be right.  But it's not what he said, and every defense so far is avoiding any such explanation of clarification of what he said.  So when he's going to such great lengths to defend what he said, I'm disinclined to give him the benefit of your doubt.

Yeah, he's an idiot no doubt.  But I doubt he's that big of an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BringBackOrton said:

Yeah, he's an idiot no doubt.  But I doubt he's that big of an idiot.

 

He was trying to explain someone else's position off-the-cuff when asked during a radio interview.  

 

It's very possible for anyone to be that big an idiot in that situation.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

He was trying to explain someone else's position off-the-cuff when asked during a radio interview.  

 

It's very possible for anyone to be that big an idiot in that situation.  

 

He didn’t realize abortion was such a touchy issue 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

In an effort to out outrage one another the left will eventually collapse on itself. There's simply too many radical trains of thought. 

 

But they are due to retake the Presidency in 2024

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I've never actually seen an act of canibalism, but I feel like it would look like this. 

 

Based on the recent cauldron of PC he should have resigned any hope of office 15 years ago

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

But they are due to retake the Presidency in 2024

 

Unfortunately , I think they have a shot. However, with so many hats that are being thrown into the ring I think it's a crap shoot. I cant imagine a far left progressive getting the independent and moderate votes, but who knows. It's a wild ride that's for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RaoulDuke79 said:

Unfortunately , I think they have a shot. However, with so many hats that are being thrown into the ring I think it's a crap shoot. I cant imagine a far left progressive getting the independent and moderate votes, but who knows. It's a wild ride that's for sure. 

 

Two terms one swing of the pendulum and then two the other way 

 

people get in their minds that change for its own sake is a virtue

 

keeps things balanced, it’s the best system ever in reality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

Have to wonder if this is retaliatory from the left after my great governor was too transparent about the abortion lobby.

 

I could see PP pissed that he failed to get the bill passed. They spent a chunk of change on him. Not surprised they want to toss him out and find another meat puppet to try again. They were quick to tell him to resign. Two million bucks. He'll resign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LABillzFan said:

 

I could see PP pissed that he failed to get the bill passed. They spent a chunk of change on him. Not surprised they want to toss him out and find another meat puppet to try again. They were quick to tell him to resign. Two million bucks. He'll resign.

 

I don’t think it’s even that the bill failed. That seemed to have limited chance of going anywhere (Virginia is hard left, but our half of the state is barely holding on). I think it’s more that he brought way too much criticism down with his infanticide comments. He didn’t know what and when to state the party lines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, row_33 said:

 

When the GOP speaks clearly the media and libs bring up dog-whistles and code-words

 

when a Dem speaks weasel-words we are told to accept it at face value, and it’s a total lie in the first place 

 

 

when i say something, my wife always thinks i'm inferring something. i am not i always mean what i say. on the other hand, when my wife says something, i take her at her word, yet she is always inferring something other than what she said.

 

it's a Venus/Mars thing.  

Edited by Foxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

This just in...Democrats insist Northam MUST RESIGN!!

 

"If Covington students must pay for the sins of others, so must Northam!" they all yelled!!!

 

Only kidding.

 

Naturally, they're okay with what he did. At least the left is starting to remember their party was the party of slavery and the KKK.

 

 

 

"His whole life has been about exactly the opposite and that's what you need to examine, not something that occurred 30 years ago...I would think there is a problem no one in the General Assembly who would like their college conduct examined" Interesting. I guess that only applies when you are not up for nomination to the Supreme Court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Foxx said:

when i say something, my wife always thinks i'm inferring something. i am not i always mean what i say. on the other hand, when my wife says something, i take her at her word, yet she is always inferring something other than what she said.

 

it's a Venus/Mars thing.  

You have discovered one of the "Eight Great Truths" my friend. Congratulations, and I wish you Godspeed in your efforts to discover another one before you are called home.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

You have discovered one of the "Eight Great Truths" my friend. Congratulations, and I wish you Godspeed in your efforts to discover another one before you are called home.

 

applies to the political parties as well, it would be fun but the media is 99.9 percent in the women/Venus/Dems camp with a vengeance 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

applies to the political parties as well, it would be fun but the media is 99.9 percent in the women/Venus/Dems camp with a vengeance 

Where would you rather set up camp, in the relatively roomy quarters of a v ag I n a or in the cramped dungeon of a dick?

Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Yeah...I think this is pretty ***** stupid.

 

But it's not going to make me enjoy any less watching these grossly hypocritical *****heads get hoist on their own petards.  They sowed it, they can ***** reap it.

 

As a liberal, this is one of the most obnoxious things about the party: the willingness to destroy careers because of stuff that happened a long time ago without and reasonable dialog about it.

 

i think when someone is accused of something we should ask two things: (1) did they actually ***** do it; (2) what should the appropriate consequence be, if any.  However, people skip both and just demand people’s careers get ruined.  

 

The worst part is that what I just typed would be considered offensive and I am careful of who is around me when I say that.  So so stupid

 

 

On a side note, as someone who has lived in the south, Virginia, and now a liberal bubble that is Minneapolis...this current controversy is so Virginia.

Edited by Crayola64
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

 

As a liberal, this is one of the most obnoxious things about the party: the willingness to destroy careers because of stuff that happened a long time ago without and reasonable dialog about it.

 

i think when someone is accused of something we should ask two things: (1) did they actually ***** do it; (2) what should the appropriate consequence be, if any.  However, people skip both and just demand people’s careers get ruined.  

 

The worst part is that what I just typed would be considered offensive and I am careful of who is around me when I say that.  So so stupid

The question that also needs to be asked is one of context. What if that picture was taken from a play that was making fun of racism or attacking stereotypes? Not so black or white anymore, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

The question that also needs to be asked is one of context. What if that picture was taken from a play that was making fun of racism or attacking stereotypes? Not so black or white anymore, eh?

 

Absolutely, I guess that would fall under my second part of deciding if or what the consequences should be.

 

while iv never dressed in black face,  imagine having a snapshot of stuff you’ve said or done taken out of context.  None of us would have jobs now!

 

the more concerning thing about this guy was his ramblings about infanticide when the bill doesn’t permit it... 

Edited by Crayola64
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

 

As a liberal, this is one of the most obnoxious things about the party: the willingness to destroy careers because of stuff that happened a long time ago without and reasonable dialog about it.

 

Correct. The problem here is not what he did. Most every 40+ adult has done something stupid like this.

 

The problem is that when something like this happens to someone on the right, there are few better than leftists to mount a coordinated effort to get a scalp, no matter what. There must be blood, followed by a few weeks of questions of others on the right to 'denounce' that person and their actions. We used to joke about having to take the Al Sharpton Jesse Jackson apology tour before slinking off to to the dark.

 

I don't think you force the dude to resign because of this.

 

On the other hand, his promotion of the state's abortion law is disgusting, and if this gets a vile Planned Parenthood meat puppet off the PP payroll and into oblivion, I'm good with whatever that takes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crayola64 said:

 

As a liberal, this is one of the most obnoxious things about the party: the willingness to destroy careers because of stuff that happened a long time ago without and reasonable dialog about it.

 

i think when someone is accused of something we should ask two things: (1) did they actually ***** do it; (2) what should the appropriate consequence be, if any.  However, people skip both and just demand people’s careers get ruined.  

 

The worst part is that what I just typed would be considered offensive and I am careful of who is around me when I say that.  So so stupid

 

 

On a side note, as someone who has lived in the south, Virginia, and now a liberal bubble that is Minneapolis...this current controversy is so Virginia.

 

This is the creeping danger that many on here have been discussing for years. The far progressive fringe is not progressive at all, they're fascist. They control what you can say, what you can think - and if you step out of line they'll release the (online) hounds to destroy you. 

 

That's not new, not really. That kind of fascism has existed on the far left (and right) since the beginning of politics. What's new, and dangerous, is that the prog-fascist left has browbeaten the majority on that side of the aisle into silence. The prog-fascist left is the loudest, the most covered, and the most protected class right now in politics. So much so that many of the silenced majority cannot even admit the fascists are lurking within their own party, not on the right

 

That's how a culture war turns into a shooting war without anyone realizing their own culpability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...