LB3 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 44 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: You can, but you can also put pressure on them using those who are not. Bishop Tobin, to my understanding, is one of the later group. It's also a political weapon. Rhode Island has a massive concentration of Catholics, the nation's highest, with between 40-45% of the state identifying as such. Politicians rarely get elected here without expressing their dedication to traditional Catholic values; it's simply one of the babies they have to kiss. The Church has the ability to demonstrate moral leadership here, more than anywhere else in the country, and I hope they will. I'm really interested in what that parents of these good Catholics would say about this. I think it would be fascinating human interest story to know what Andrew Cuomos mother thinks. Does she see him as a modern day Nazi or a freedom fighter? Same with Raimondo. And btw, the Virgina Gov never explained how the human life is extinguished after being made comfortable. What does that look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 Quote Max KennerlyVerified account @MaxKennerly FollowFollow @MaxKennerly I think @GovernorVA fumbled his words a bit, because he's discussing something else, i.e., when to terminate life support for neonates with terminal health conditions (he gives the example of "deformities"). That isn't addressed by VA House Bill No. 2491. “Fumbled his words a bit” is an interesting way of saying “Endorsed infanticide” . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 More to the thread... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 https://twitter.com/tdwilliamsrome/status/1090606295365963776 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 28 minutes ago, B-Man said: “Fumbled his words a bit” is an interesting way of saying “Endorsed infanticide” . I could actually accept that excuse: he was trying to give an off-the-cuff explanation of a state legislator's position. He could have misspoken. What I CAN'T accept is the governor's office's current explanation of "He didn't misspeak, Republicans are misrepresenting what he said!" He literally said it was up to the doctors and parents to decide whether or not to kill an infant after the infant is born. He may have misspoken. But he did say that. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: I could actually accept that excuse: he was trying to give an off-the-cuff explanation of a state legislator's position. He could have misspoken. What I CAN'T accept is the governor's office's current explanation of "He didn't misspeak, Republicans are misrepresenting what he said!" He literally said it was up to the doctors and parents to decide whether or not to kill an infant after the infant is born. He may have misspoken. But he did say that. Leaving one to wonder how the life of the child is extinguished thereafter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Leaving one to wonder how the life of the child is extinguished thereafter. I propose compromise on late term abortion in exchange for less gun control. You can abort your baby within the typical 365 day return policy as established by Amazon and your abortion will be performed via a a fully legal and fully automatic AR-15 with 30 round magazine. Edited January 30, 2019 by Jauronimo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Leaving one to wonder how the life of the child is extinguished thereafter. Limb by limb, sold to the highest bidder. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 (edited) 16 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I could actually accept that excuse: he was trying to give an off-the-cuff explanation of a state legislator's position. He could have misspoken. What I CAN'T accept is the governor's office's current explanation of "He didn't misspeak, Republicans are misrepresenting what he said!" He literally said it was up to the doctors and parents to decide whether or not to kill an infant after the infant is born. He may have misspoken. But he did say that. Trying to lie....................with the help of the media.....................................NO MORE He was asked if he supported the bill put forward by Delegate Tran. In her bill it allows a mother to abort a healthy baby full term even after dilation for mental health reasons. That has nothing to do with disabilities or viability Except the bill wants to change it from 3 physicians to just 1! It also changes from MUST to SHALL. Understand the law: "the Supreme Court ruled that when the word "shall" appears in statutes, it means "may." The new wording changes it to they >may< give life support procedures Today's @washingtonpost print edition makes no mention of Virginia Delegate Kathy Tran's bill to allow abortion until birth. I also can't find anything online. What's the deal, @SchneiderG? OH, it's there now.........................and how is it covered ? You got it..................."REPUBLICAN'S POUNCE" Edited January 30, 2019 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 This is utterly nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 17 minutes ago, njbuff said: This is utterly nuts. This is the Democratic Party. Notice you don't here a single one denouncing it? Or even complaining about it? Part or the reason is that the media won't ask them and the other part is because, if asked, they'll show full support for full-term abortions. How do you think Kamala Harris became a Senator? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 2 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Okay, so can someone break down for me why these liberal states are all, suddenly and virtually simultaneously, declaring they want to abort babies at any stage? Was this some big campaign promise? Has American been asking for this? It's a little stunning, and a lot scary. Maybe that is not what happens.....maybe it is just a right wing tangent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 31 minutes ago, B-Man said: Trying to lie....................with the help of the media.....................................NO MORE He was asked if he supported the bill put forward by Delegate Tran. In her bill it allows a mother to abort a healthy baby full term even after dilation for mental health reasons. That has nothing to do with disabilities or viability Except the bill wants to change it from 3 physicians to just 1! It also changes from MUST to SHALL. Understand the law: "the Supreme Court ruled that when the word "shall" appears in statutes, it means "may." The new wording changes it to they >may< give life support procedures Today's @washingtonpost print edition makes no mention of Virginia Delegate Kathy Tran's bill to allow abortion until birth. I also can't find anything online. What's the deal, @SchneiderG? OH, it's there now.........................and how is it covered ? You got it..................."REPUBLICAN'S POUNCE" What's horrifying is how many people I'm seeing try to justify what he said. Literally, he espoused the Nazi principle of "life unworthy of life." And people are saying "Yeah, I don't see the problem with that" and "Republicans are just twisting what he said." ***** what??????????? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 Just now, TH3 said: Maybe that is not what happens.....maybe it is just a right wing tangent Yeah. That's it. Four states come out in support of infanticide, and you think it's just a right-wing tangent. So are you in favor of these new laws? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 1. Don't report fully on the initial comments 2. Only report once a clarification is sent out 3. Focus story on Republican backlash It sure is good to be a Democrat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 13 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: This is the Democratic Party. Notice you don't here a single one denouncing it? Or even complaining about it? Part or the reason is that the media won't ask them and the other part is because, if asked, they'll show full support for full-term abortions. How do you think Kamala Harris became a Senator? She had an affair with Willie Brown. No other reason. She is a clown who shouldn't be anywhere near politics, but like you said, that is the Democratic Party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 1 minute ago, njbuff said: She had an affair with Willie Brown. No other reason. She is a clown who shouldn't be anywhere near politics, but like you said, that is the Democratic Party. She was also bankrolled by PP to confiscate Daleiden's videos while CA AG. PP owns Kamala Harris, much like they own the governors now making it legal to deliver a baby alive so as to have a better chance at providing limbs to market. One of Daleiden's videos actually has PP talking about how much better their chances are of getting more salable limbs if they can remove them while the baby is still alive outside the womb. Videos, by the way, which were recently proven to not be doctored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 In case you were curious...according to the VIrginia Public Access Project website, VA governor Ralph Northam has received almost $2M from Planned Parenthood. Like I said earlier: PP gets money for baby parts; Dems make it easier for PP to get baby parts; PP gives money to Dems to keep them in office so PP can keep dicing up the babies. America's Democrat Party: They're going to get their money if they have to rip your babies limb from limb. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 15 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: America's Democrat Party: They're going to get their money if they have to rip your babies limb from limb. Don't pretend there aren't Republicans that support this, too. This whole country is *****. Support and understanding for Islam. Free-for-all abortion. Socialism rising. Half the country wants all of central america to take up residence within our borders. And all the way, a press that cheers for that kind of thing. God won't be blessing America anytime soon. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts