Jump to content

Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread


snafu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Updated that for you. It's a crisis now, what with only 11 1/2 years left to live and all....

 

Noted. Thanks. Hard to keep up with all of the apocalyptic predictions and terminology when it changes so often. You know, because the science is "settled."

9 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm sure he bought carbon offsets, so he's fine.

 

Yup. I am sure that putting money in a piggy bank will suddenly reverse our climate "crisis."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

PROGRESSIVISM IS CARING ABOUT THE LITTLE PEOPLE 

 

‘I’m Starting Not To Care That She Is Brutal To Her Staff.’

 

 “I thought every candidate had a good moment or two, though my memory is blurred by the unrelenting pace produced by too many topics and the tug-of-war for control of the conversation. Klobuchar had some smart answers. I’m starting not to care that she is brutal to her staff. (Why do we care so much about that? 99.9 percent of us will never work for her.)”

 

That’s Larry Sabato from the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics.

 
 
 
 
.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KRC said:

 

Noted. Thanks. Hard to keep up with all of the apocalyptic predictions and terminology when it changes so often. You know, because the science is "settled."

 

Yup. I am sure that putting money in someone else's piggy bank will suddenly reverse our climate "crisis."

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

As usual Transplantee has his/her head up its ass and spews opinions and "facts" without providing any kind of backup.

 

Backup???

 

Bruh, it's not difficult to find the fundraising numbers for all the candidates and add them up.

 

This isn't some overly complex thing to find. 

 

If you need guidance, use Google to find the official campaign numbers and a calculator to add them up.

 

Or don't do that if you don't want. Seems some of you are desperate to keep up this false narrative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Backup???

 

Bruh, it's not difficult to find the fundraising numbers for all the candidates and add them up.

 

This isn't some overly complex thing to find. 

 

If you need guidance, use Google to find the official campaign numbers and a calculator to add them up.

 

Or don't do that if you don't want. Seems some of you are desperate to keep up this false narrative. 

Ah, a teacher who can't/won't learn. How many times do you have to be told that if you make claims, you are the person who needs to back up those claims. I don't need to back them up for you. Why is this so hard for you to understand? When it comes to you it's like Groundhog Day all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Ah, a teacher who can't/won't learn. How many times do you have to be told that if you make claims, you are the person who needs to back up those claims. I don't need to back them up for you. Why is this so hard for you to understand? When it comes to you it's like Groundhog Day all over again.

 

Keep deflecting with your ad hominem attack rather than addressing the issue at hand.

 

Start here. It's the obvious place to start, and notice the stark difference between blue and red:

https://www.fec.gov/data/raising-bythenumbers/

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SASSE MAKES SENATE DEMS VOTE ON BETO’S RADICAL JIHAD AGAINST CHURCH TAX-EXEMPTION:

 

Don’t be surprised if all six Senate Democrats running for their party’s 2020 presidential nomination are nowhere to be seen on the Senate floor Monday, thanks to Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). And Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who on Thursday invoked a Senate rule to fast-track something the Dems would rather avoid.

 

Sasse introduced a resolution that declares “any effort by the government to condition the receipt of the protections of the Constitution of the United States and the laws of the United States, including an exemption from taxation, on the public policy positions of an organization, is an affront to the spirit and letter of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.”

 

The Nebraska Republican was reacting to former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke’s promise to withdraw the federal tax exemptions of all churches, synagogues and mosques that oppose same-sex marriage. Today, the jihad targets religious tax exemptions; sooner or later, they’ll want to tell us how to vote. If they let us vote.

 

 

 

 

What ?   we don't actually want to go on record for our crazy proposals.

 

?

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Backup???

 

Bruh, it's not difficult to find the fundraising numbers for all the candidates and add them up.

 

This isn't some overly complex thing to find. 

 

 

Actually, it is.  I've done it.

 

If you think it's easy, you're doing it wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

HRC continuing to prove she's not a serious person

 

 

 

Wait...people honestly believe Gabbard is a Russian plant as a third party candidate, and that's a plan by Trump and Putin to steal the election by dividing the Democratic voting bloc?

 

People honestly accept that at face value?  Where the ***** did this come from?  That story went from nothing to "consensus opinion" in about five days.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Wait...people honestly believe Gabbard is a Russian plant as a third party candidate, and that's a plan by Trump and Putin to steal the election by dividing the Democratic voting bloc?

 

People honestly accept that at face value?  Where the ***** did this come from?  That story went from nothing to "consensus opinion" in about five days.  

 

 

She was always full of shite. Trump didn't break her, he exposed her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

Oh... wait... well, this isn't what the media keeps saying... 

 

 

 

 

 

Bye, Joe. Hope the lifetime of corruption was worth it.

 

What's really cute is that, in 2015, THE MEDIA was raising those alarms, too.  

 

Although it's "odd" that the article from 2015 that I found two weeks ago no longer shows up when I try to google it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

What's really cute is that, in 2015, THE MEDIA was raising those alarms, too.  

 

Although it's "odd" that the article from 2015 that I found two weeks ago no longer shows up when I try to google it.

 

Yup. 

 

And for those who forget the history -- why was the media pushing it in 2015? Because Clinton was their choice to run in 2016 and they were pressuring Joe not to run. In fact, Clinton's goons used this story to keep Joe from running, promising to destroy his legacy with it if he dared challenge her. 

 

It was "her turn" after all. 

 

The media was all in on Clinton... still are. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Wait...people honestly believe Gabbard is a Russian plant as a third party candidate, and that's a plan by Trump and Putin to steal the election by dividing the Democratic voting bloc?

 

People honestly accept that at face value?  Where the ***** did this come from?  That story went from nothing to "consensus opinion" in about five days.  

  That idea (Russian plant) has Tibs stink all over it.  Hillary would make a piss poor poker player (PPPP?) seeing that she just telegraphed her obvious interest in the race and particularly Warren.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Yup. 

 

And for those who forget the history -- why was the media pushing it in 2015? Because Clinton was their choice to run in 2016 and they were pressuring Joe not to run. In fact, Clinton's goons used this story to keep Joe from running, promising to destroy his legacy with it if he dared challenge her. 

 

It was "her turn" after all. 

 

The media was all in on Clinton... still are. 

  It will take many years going forward for the Clinton machine to die as it is more likely she is being prepped for a congressional seat.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Yup. 

 

And for those who forget the history -- why was the media pushing it in 2015? Because Clinton was their choice to run in 2016 and they were pressuring Joe not to run. In fact, Clinton's goons used this story to keep Joe from running, promising to destroy his legacy with it if he dared challenge her. 

 

It was "her turn" after all. 

 

The media was all in on Clinton... still are. 

 

Didn't one of Joe's sons die around 2015, cutting the wind from his sails to run in 2016?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, row_33 said:

 

Didn't one of Joe's sons die around 2015, cutting the wind from his sails to run in 2016?

 

 

 

Well...isn't that just coincidental.  WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!

 

Seriously..."Hillary Clinton had Beau Biden killed to keep Joe out of the race in 2016" is no less reprehensible - and no less likely - than "Tulsi Gabbard is a traitor working for the Russians."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Well...isn't that just coincidental.  WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!

 

Seriously..."Hillary Clinton had Beau Biden killed to keep Joe out of the race in 2016" is no less reprehensible - and no less likely - than "Tulsi Gabbard is a traitor working for the Russians."

...speaking of Beau, wasn't he Delaware's AG?......the family had a stranglehold on Delaware politics much the same as the Landreau gang in Louisiana.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Yes. And that was the public excuse Joe used. 

 

Behind the scenes, the Clinton machine was applying pressure on precisely this subject. 

My guess is that's why it took Joe so long (compared to the others) to declare. He was waiting to see what Hillary was going to do.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...