Jump to content

McDermott not pleased with WRs in practice


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, BuffAlone said:

True. But the most basic of talents that any professional WR must have is to be able to catch the damn ball

right...which is why they should have acquired receivers that can do this

Edited by nucci
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I’m just not excusing them. As an example they could have picked Ju-Ju instead of Zay. That would have been a good decision. The free agent receivers that they paid in 2017 were Andre Holmes, Anquan Boldin, Philly Brown, Rod Streater, Jeremy Butler and Brandon Tate. They get the blame for that. Not one of those guys can play. They also trade for Mathews and Benjamin while trading up for Zay. That was the group that they decided was good enough after trading Watkins and letting Woods and Goodwin walk. They don’t get a pass for that or get to hide behind “the process.” That can’t be judged as anything but a massive failure. 

 

I actually liked Brandon Tate and I'd take him in a heartbeat as both a WR and a Returner on this squad.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffAlone said:

My point is every WR in the NFL should have at least that basic ability. To catch the ball

I'm not arguing your point. I'm saying maybe they shouldn't be in the NFL if they can't catch the ball...that's why players get released....because they can't play well enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, SoTier said:

 

Another disingenuous Bills cheerleader making excuses for McDermott's poor decisions with personnel.   You can pretend this is about scrubs who aren't on the current roster but you -- and every other knowledgeable Bills fan -- knows  this is a reference to the three top class WRs the Bills didn't re-sign or traded away in 2017: Goodwin, Watkins, and Woods and were replaced with the slow, stone-handed bunch the Bills scraped up from among the NFL's worst scrubs.

 

Since you seem to have "forgotten" that these WRs were Bills pre-McDermott, I'll remind you that last season, the three WRs the Bills got rid of all blossomed with their new teams: Marquise Goodwin caught 56 passes (53% of targets) for 962 yards and 2 TDs; Watkins caught 39 passes (56% of targets) for 593 yards and 8 TDs;  Robert Woods caught 56 passes (66% of targets) for 781 yards and 5 TDs.  This season they've all continued to shine.  In fact on Sunday, Goodwin, Watkins, and Woods had 4 TDs among them. 

 

 

 

Once again, you want the whole enchilada but you don't have enough money in your pocket to pay for the whole enchilada. See above discussion re. keeping Watkins and Woods on the contracts they wanted and our cap situation. Beane's mantra has been to build through the draft (rookies on 4 and 5 year contracts), acquire free agents to fill in the rest. The acquisition of free agents hinges on the amount of cash in your pocket. Next year we can buy 7 or 8 whole enchiladas. Your argument boils down to "I want my franchise QB, I want D line free agents like Murphy and Star, I want a young middle LB, I want a fast WR and a strong WR, I want Shady, I want this, I want that..."  You'll get the fast and strong WR. But you have to wait a bit for it. In the interim, you play with the guys you have.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:

Once again, you want the whole enchilada but you don't have enough money in your pocket to pay for the whole enchilada. See above discussion re. keeping Watkins and Woods on the contracts they wanted and our cap situation. Beane's mantra has been to build through the draft (rookies on 4 and 5 year contracts), acquire free agents to fill in the rest. The acquisition of free agents hinges on the amount of cash in your pocket. Next year we can buy 7 or 8 whole enchiladas. Your argument boils down to "I want my franchise QB, I want D line free agents like Murphy and Star, I want a young middle LB, I want a fast WR and a strong WR, I want Shady, I want this, I want that..."  You'll get the fast and strong WR. But you have to wait a bit for it. In the interim, you play with the guys you have.

not to mention , you have to stagger rookie contracts so they're not all due the same year. it's the only way to keep a core together.  it's also likely to be an even more exciting off season than last year. process....

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I tend to agree. He’s back on the Saints though. I liked Deonte Thompson too as a role guy.

I also think the Kerley decision I disagree with was cutting him. By my observation, he was the best WR in a Bills uniform in week 1. I just don't understand it. We've talked about roster things a bunch, there's plenty of past posts showing moves we advocated for. I definitely don't see your points here as hindsight. At this point I legitimately feel like if we cut all 6 and signed 6 FAs it might be an upgrade. Tate was an FA until yesterday, so he was part of that thought, but with guys like Inman, Janis, Maclin, Wheaton, Britt, Wright, and even Bryant out there this squad feels weird. Then factor in guys like Tanner Gentry or Cam Phillips who are PS guys. I don't know. I just feel like this FO has no eye for offense.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Lurker said:

Meh.    That looked like McD's normal approach, except he didn't clap.    Are we supposed to think that makes him 'fired up?'...

I don’t think the f-bombs that reportedly could be heard across the field are McDermott’s normal approach 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

I W Then factor in guys like Tanner Gentry or Cam Phillips who are PS guys. I don't know. I just feel like this FO has no eye for offense.

 

I just don't understand their obstinate stand regarding this position. When it is entirely obvious that the group is terrible, there haven't been any recent attempts to address the issue. Cant we at least cycle a few of these to see if anyone can fill a role ala Donald Jones ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

I also think the Kerley decision I disagree with was cutting him. By my observation, he was the best WR in a Bills uniform in week 1. I just don't understand it. We've talked about roster things a bunch, there's plenty of past posts showing moves we advocated for. I definitely don't see your points here as hindsight. At this point I legitimately feel like if we cut all 6 and signed 6 FAs it might be an upgrade. Tate was an FA until yesterday, so he was part of that thought, but with guys like Inman, Janis, Maclin, Wheaton, Britt, Wright, and even Bryant out there this squad feels weird. Then factor in guys like Tanner Gentry or Cam Phillips who are PS guys. I don't know. I just feel like this FO has no eye for offense.

That’s kind of what I am getting at. This isn’t like, “they haven’t had a chance to invest yet.” They used more than a 2nd on Zay and a 3rd on Benjamin. They were planning on them being core members of this receiver group moving forward at the time they acquired them. The same can probably be said for Jordan Mathews. Not one of those guys is going to be a key part of your receiver room. They may be in the room but as guys not focal points. This regime just kind of butchered the position and now need to hit the reset button.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

That video is hardly getting into players for stuff. I expected grabbing Allen by the facemask or something more than this. This probably happens every few plays in practice. It’s jist most of the time the lying media isn’t there to video tape it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

“Gutted” is such a graphic term...I prefer “culled”. 

 

Where the the hell are Brandon Reilly and Tanner Gentry???!!!! I hear they are amazing!!!!

 

Neither of them knew how Brian Daboll liked his coffee (with a shot of whiskey) in it but Robert Foster does so he got the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fan in Chicago said:

I just don't understand their obstinate stand regarding this position. When it is entirely obvious that the group is terrible, there haven't been any recent attempts to address the issue. Cant we at least cycle a few of these to see if anyone can fill a role ala Donald Jones ?

 

I got nothin'.  It's one of my areas of concern about McBeane and company. 

It seems they honestly felt that Boldin +  Zay Jones + Matthews would be an upgrade on Watkins + Woods + Goodwin, which is stunningly wrong. 

Then this off-season they felt that Benjamin + Zay Jones + Holmes + Foster would be adequate and that Coleman was worth a $3.5M shot to see if he could turn his career around in 1 month - which really makes me question their judgement and the quality of their pro personnel scouting.

 

The only thing I can think is that they're trying to change one piece at a time on offense, trying to improve the line but leave the WR as is (though certainly on D they're making simultaneous moves at DL and DB).   

 

There may be some sense in that. 

 

To my amateur eyes, I see open WR almost every play, the challenge is giving Allen enough time to go through his progressions and find them.

The Vikes game, the catch % for the throws that were made to WR/TE is a not unreasonable 64.7%, the problem is there were only 17 of them - all game.

So it may be that the WR aren't as bad as we believe, the challenge is Allen having time to find them, set, and throw. 

 

9 minutes ago, mrags said:

That video is hardly getting into players for stuff. I expected grabbing Allen by the facemask or something more than this. This probably happens every few plays in practice. It’s jist most of the time the lying media isn’t there to video tape it. 

 

What I saw in that video was Rayray McCloud clowning around and McDermott chewing his a** for it.

 

I expect you're correct that the media, lying or not, isn't around for it usually.   

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I got nothin'.  It's one of my areas of concern about McBeane and company. 

It seems they honestly felt that Boldin +  Zay Jones + Matthews would be an upgrade on Watkins + Woods + Goodwin, which is stunningly wrong. 

Then this off-season they felt that Benjamin + Zay Jones + Holmes + Foster would be adequate and that Coleman was worth a $3.5M shot to see if he could turn his career around in 1 month - which really makes me question their judgement and the quality of their pro personnel scouting.  Woods, Watkins and Goodwin would have cost us more money than we had. Beane-ology dictates that you get some draft picks or unload salary to acquire younger players and re-visit the WR position when the cornerstones (QB, Defensive secondary and line, and MLB are set)

 

The only thing I can think is that they're trying to change one piece at a time on offense, trying to improve the line but leave the WR as is (though certainly on D they're making simultaneous moves at DL and DB).   THIS

 

There may be some sense in that. 

 

To my amateur eyes, I see open WR almost every play, the challenge is giving Allen enough time to go through his progressions and find them.

The Vikes game, the catch % for the throws that were made to WR/TE is a not unreasonable 64.7%, the problem is there were only 17 of them - all game.

So it may be that the WR aren't as bad as we believe, the challenge is Allen having time to find them, set, and throw. 

 

 

What I saw in that video was Rayray McCloud clowning around and McDermott chewing his a** for it.

 

I expect you're correct that the media, lying or not, isn't around for it usually.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...