Paulus Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 I'm personally amazed there are still Petermaniacs out there. I was just curious to see if they are just loud, or if there really are that many. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrikeParry Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 Not me bro. Let’s see what Allen has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProcessYaDigg Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 We traded the wrong QB. We should've kept AJM. I thought he looked better than freaking Nate. Plus he's been around the league a little longer. Damn this regime for keeping Nate. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 I really didn't want him to play at all this year, but as the roster stands now, we have no choice. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, Paulus said: I'm personally amazed there are still Petermaniacs out there. I was just curious to see if they are just loud, or if there really are that many. Maybe but I think there was mainly a few hard core Peterman fans/Never Allens. What I think happened is that a lot of people in middle shifted around through the preseason. Right before the Cincinnati there was movement towards Allen winning it. After that was mostly gone and Peterman still being preseason Peterman people shifted that way. Also it was compounded with people worried that with as awful as the line was in that game that Allen would get ruined playing behind them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 No way McDermott can trot Peterman out there unless he wants to lose this team. It's one thing to play well in training camp and the preseason but this team has watched Peterman go into REAL NFL games and play as bad as you possible can play twice now in games that didn't have a whiteout. When a player plays his worst when the games count the most there is no way his teammates can have confidence in him and Peterman simply looks scared and like he never has played football in his life before in real games...completely the opposite of what he did in the preseason. It's obvious Peterman cannot handle playing under the bright lights. When the chips are down, Peterman folds like a cheap tent. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djp14150 Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 What veteran FA QB is out there looking for work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadingpain Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 (edited) Edited September 10, 2018 by Fadingpain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted September 10, 2018 Author Share Posted September 10, 2018 Just now, Warcodered said: Maybe but I think there was mainly a few hard core Peterman fans/Never Allens. What I think happened is that a lot of people in middle shifted around through the preseason. Right before the Cincinnati there was movement towards Allen winning it. After that was mostly gone and Peterman still being preseason Peterman people shifted that way. Also it was compounded with people worried that with as awful as the line was in that game that Allen would get ruined playing behind them. Yeah, I was really just curious. I see only one legit argument to start Nate again, and that is to protect Allen from our OL. I also see one legit reason why McBeane starts Nate, and that is hubris. I was amazed to even see any Petermaniacs after that first half. I felt sorry for Nate. He was like a tiny, beaten, retarded child. The Ravens were not even proud they won. That is how bad the Bills and Nate were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 Just now, Fadingpain said: You didn't provide the correct answer as an option! So I didn't vote. Nate should NOT start, but WILL I guess that would be the bottom one I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 If you listen to McCoy's post game, it's obvious which guy he wants out there. It's got to happen. Home opener. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Paulus said: Yeah, I was really just curious. I see only one legit argument to start Nate again, and that is to protect Allen from our OL. I also see one legit reason why McBeane starts Nate, and that is hubris. I was amazed to even see any Petermaniacs after that first half. I felt sorry for Nate. He was like a tiny, beaten, retarded child. The Ravens were not even proud they won. That is how bad the Bills and Nate were. Something I thought was interesting was I didn't see any of them how up until after he was pulled. Nobody was there defending him while he was actively being terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadingpain Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Paulus said: Yeah, I was really just curious. I see only one legit argument to start Nate again, and that is to protect Allen from our OL. I also see one legit reason why McBeane starts Nate, and that is hubris. I was amazed to even see any Petermaniacs after that first half. I felt sorry for Nate. He was like a tiny, beaten, retarded child. The Ravens were not even proud they won. That is how bad the Bills and Nate were. Did you hear McD in his post-game PC? He clearly indicated, twice, that he thinks this game got off to a bad start with some unfortunate, dumb luck type stuff happening against us. Or words to that effect. I.E., re-play the first 10 minutes of this game a few more times and Peterman emerges looking much better, according to McD. At least that is my interpretation of his comments. You watch! That idiot will start NATE even though he should not. I think it fits more their plan to do so and they will go back to Nate until they simply can't and retain credibility. I.E., if Nate repeats the same performance next week, that might be it for him, but I think he gets 1 more chance. I personally want Allen to start all games, BTW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLBighits Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 If they start Nate that will almost be as bad as pushing James J. Schwartz out the door after hiring Rex Ryan. Should of hired an offensive coach instead and left the defense alone. ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadingpain Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, Warcodered said: I guess that would be the bottom one I think. Agreed, which is why I deleted that post! Anyway, I voted with pick 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 Peter Pan lost me today. Tried to hold on for as long as I could. Cut him and sign Moore or Lynch. I wouldn't even keep him on the roster any longer. Start shopping for couch qbs. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 Josh Allen must start next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 I voted that Josh should start but won't. I don't see any reason whatsoever that McD should start NP, but then again I didn't think there was any good reason McD would start him against the Chargers or the Ravens. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Kelly the Dog said: I voted that Josh should start but won't. I don't see any reason whatsoever that McD should start NP, but then again I didn't think there was any good reason McD would start him against the Chargers or the Ravens. Maybe but I think there might be a good chance. McDermot wouldn't throw Peterman under the bus but he didn't shoot down the idea of Allen taking over week 2. So he did leave the question out there which is something you usually don't do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 10, 2018 Share Posted September 10, 2018 54 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Maybe but I think there might be a good chance. McDermot wouldn't throw Peterman under the bus but he didn't shoot down the idea of Allen taking over week 2. So he did leave the question out there which is something you usually don't do. Unfortunately, I genuinely believe that right now McDermott doesn't know himself who he is going to choose, which is frightening. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts