Jump to content

Bills vs. Ravens Postgame ?


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

Let's face it.  McDermott broke the offense and doesn't have anyone on his staff that can fix it.  To make matters worse the personal choices for offense have been less than stellar also.  A good OC could patch this together but I don't think Daboll has shown any ability to turn lemons into lemonade.  Gailey would screen pass the hell out of them which would help the OL and Shady would be perfect.  Roman or Lynn would let Allen run RPO's and help the run game and the WR's.  At the very least they would have a more disciplined group of misfits and keep the penalties down a little bit.  If they could do that it would be an improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

 

Well, that’s good news.

 

If Peterman was to remain the starter he would have said that immediately.

 

It’s Allen moving forward.

 

I never want to see Nathan Peterman take another meaningful snap in a Bills uniform. In my 45 years of being a Bills fan, I rank him as the worst. Below Dufek, below Marangi, below !@#$ing Willie Totten.

Edited by Binghamton Beast
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sleeby said:

Huh?  How many quarters did n8 play last year?  

Strawman. He was promoted to start in the middle of a playoff run over a competent veteran starter. He would have started more games if coach say-nothing could have found even a sliver of justification for it amidst Peterman’s voluminous suckitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, StrikeParry said:

Bull. This started last year long before Allen arrived.

 

As soon as the team traded TT we knew it was a rebuilding year. And rightly so.  No pain no gain. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

Meh, maybe.  AJ vs Nate is arguing over who is the least terrible QB.  

 

No......after todays crap you cannot compare Peterman to "anyone"....it would be an insult to "anyone" to do so......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StrikeParry said:

Strawman. He was promoted to start in the middle of a playoff run over a competent veteran starter. He would have started more games if coach say-nothing could have found even a sliver of justification for it amidst Peterman’s voluminous suckitude.

That's not a strawman. 2017 was not a playoff year outside of semantics.  They were moving on from tyrod amd it was a rebuild; they tested the telent pool.  Power of hindsight - use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, klos63 said:

Wasn't last year the rebuilding year? Why rebuild the year after making the playoffs?

 

Because the best that team could do was last WC and no chance at a super bowl run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dubs said:

 

As soon as the team traded TT we knew it was a rebuilding year. And rightly so.  No pain no gain. 

True but if they lose like this week in week out it is still a disaster. Most fans will check out. Indy was pretty terrible last year but lost a lot of games due to an inability to hold leads. This doesn’t look like an Indy situation.

Edited by StrikeParry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...