Jump to content

Do You Give any Credibility to the Late Night Talking Heads?


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, RochesterRob said:

  Surprised nobody has mentioned Samantha Bee.  She is beyond horrid and her intentions are obvious even if she believes otherwise.

I'm not surprised.

 

The only people who watch Samantha Bee are looking for some comedic self re-enforcement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colbert and John Oliver are brilliant comedians. Trevor Noah is talented but not real funny. All of the other ones IMO suck. Myers is awful. Kimmel has moments every couple weeks. Fallon is a really talented guy just not funny or good interviewer. Bee sucks balls. Conan is still pretty funny at times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:

Colbert and John Oliver are brilliant comedians. Trevor Noah is talented but not real funny. All of the other ones IMO suck. Myers is awful. Kimmel has moments every couple weeks. Fallon is a really talented guy just not funny or good interviewer. Bee sucks balls. Conan is still pretty funny at times. 

 

Bee's fatal flaw is she's not really interested in making people laugh.  It's just a self-indulgent catharsis for her and the writers raging out at the world like all the talking heads you see in cable news.  I also find her skits similar to Sasha Cohen's - they may intend them to be funny but they come across as being mean-spirited.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, dpberr said:

 

Bee's fatal flaw is she's not really interested in making people laugh.  It's just a self-indulgent catharsis for her and the writers raging out at the world like all the talking heads you see in cable news.  I also find her skits similar to Sasha Cohen's - they may intend them to be funny but they come across as being mean-spirited.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  I don't think that she is even that deep.  She comes across as a paid DNC personality and a Hillary-bot when the election was still going on.  She is not very bright and cannot understand that the US can't spend like Canada on social causes because we have to maintain the largest military in the free world.  She can begin to lecture others when her home country of Canada starts spending serious dollars on fighter planes and aircraft carriers to name a few items along with maintaining Canadian social programs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

So is the issue that these TV hosts are wrong, or that they are right and doing a more effective job communicating what is happening than actual news people?

They're not communicating what's happening. They're just like mainstream cable news networks. They present themselves as unbias when what they really are = hacks.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

They're not communicating what's happening. They're just like mainstream cable news networks. They present themselves as unbias when what they really are = hacks.

 

I think they are just telling jokes. Not presenting themselves as anything more than that. 

If anything they expose the absurdity of the leadership we live under now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

I think they are just telling jokes. Not presenting themselves as anything more than that. 

The only joke is those whom laugh when they espouse on material and information they have no idea with which they understand. Kimmel does this regularly on political issues: saying insurance should cover pre existing conditions was one of the most wildly stupid proposals possible.  It's akin to saying you have a burning house and want home owners insurance.

 

It sounds good because you're trying to help people but when you take the reality of anyone on TV and put it to use it never works.  From Mel Kiper to John Stamous... They're all bloviating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:

 

Whats the absurd part ?   

The federal government en masse over the last 17 years?

But these low IQ TV people don't deserve the credit, it's their writers and these group think tanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

The only joke is those whom laugh when they espouse on material and information they have no idea with which they understand. Kimmel does this regularly on political issues: saying insurance should cover pre existing conditions was one of the most wildly stupid proposals possible.  It's akin to saying you have a burning house and want home owners insurance.

 

It sounds good because you're trying to help people but when you take the reality of anyone on TV and put it to use it never works.  From Mel Kiper to John Stamous... They're all bloviating.

 

Do the bloviators include Hannity and Alex Jones?

 

By the way, did the Stadium Wall rules change recently to allow PPP threads in other forums? 

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Do the bloviators include Hannity and Alex Jones?

 

By the way, did the Stadium Wall rules change recently to allow PPP threads in other forums? 

Of course they do

 

From Walter Cronkite to Anderson Cooper, they're all bigots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...