Jump to content

[Incomplete Title] Sabres (21-12-5) & NHL 2018-19 - Game 39 (MSG-B) vs. BOS (20-14-4) at 7 PM ET on 12/29


Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

“Goalofsson” Haha. I love it. Kid is establishing himself quickly with 12 in six. Let all these youngins cook together in RaChaCha for the season and see if they can establish a winning culture of their own before being subjected to the losers on the big club. I think Botterill is a big advocate of sewing success as a group in the minors, too. I think Housley will be pushing the panic button before long though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to see if this kid can start to get some more production at even strength.  That's when it could really start to get interesting.  So far 7 of his 12 points are on the powerplay.  He's not always going to have that space to work with.

 

While the numbers aren't as gaudy, Nylander's over a point per game (7 in 6).  Hopefully he's turned the corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnC said:

His momma should sternly tell him to comb his unruly hair. 

and why does he wear his pants so tight!!! jJohn, you be showing your age?

Prolly took him 20 minutes to get it to look just like that!

 

.!Should see what my kid's hair look like when he saunters out of the house in the morning!

Edited by plenzmd1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DpvOinRWwAMAEfK.jpg

cut.jpg

 

Game Preview: 10/18/18 at San Jose

 

GAME-DAY RESOURCES
Game Notes NHL Stats Press Clips

 

LAST GAME
Tuesday, October 16
Buffalo 1 at Vegas 4
Goals: Sobotka
Goalie: Hutton (25 saves/28 shots); 1 ENG
PP: 0/6; PK: 2/3; Shots: Vegas 29 – Buffalo 27
 
CURRENT INJURIES – (Man Games Lost: 29)
Player (injury, first game missed) – total games missed
Matt Hunwick (neck, Oct. 4; injured reserve) – 6 games
Sean Malone (knee, Oct. 4; injured reserve) – 6 games
Scott Wilson (ankle, Oct. 4; injured reserve) – 6 games
 
TRANSACTIONS IN PAST 7 DAYS
10/16: Activated D Zach Bogosian from IR; Assigned D Matt Tennyson to Rochester (AHL)
10/17: Signed F Matej Pekar to a three-year, entry-level contract
 
UPCOMING GAMES
Saturday, Oct. 20: Buffalo at Los Angeles, 3:30 p.m.
Sunday, Oct. 21: Buffalo at Anaheim, 8 p.m.
Thursday, Oct. 25: Montreal at Buffalo, 7 p.m.
Saturday, Oct. 27: Buffalo at Columbus, 7 p.m.
Tuesday, Oct. 30: Calgary at Buffalo, 7 p.m.
 
TONIGHT’S GAME
SABRES at SHARKS
  • This is the first of two meetings between the Sabres and Sharks this season.
  • Next meeting: Tuesday, Nov. 7 in Buffalo
  • Last meeting: San Jose defeated Buffalo 3-2 in Buffalo on Oct. 28, 2017
  • The Sabres are 6-3-1 in their last 10 games vs. the Sharks; 6-3-1 on the road
  • This is the 40th game all-time between Buffalo and San Jose; Buffalo has a 24-9-6 series record.
  • The Sabres are 7-7-5 on the road against the Sharks all-time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to cheer against your Sabres tonight. Other than that I like them to do well. 

Sharks are definitely not hitting on all cylinders yet. PP, oddly enough, not working. Going to take some time. IMHO I think Burns and Karlsson will have to be on separate power play squads. 

Jones has been inconsistent. Dell actually better at the moment.

Sharks usually suck the first game at home after a long road trip.

Players to watch that you might not know or be that familiar with.

Timo Meir. Tough power forward with skills. Point A to point B straight line kinda guy. Really like him.

Marcus Sorenson. 4th liner guy with surprising skill and speed. Not going to be 4th very long. Small but not afraid to go anywhere and take the crap. Really shined in the playoffs last season. Here is a nice look at what he can do.

GOOD LUCK!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh-oh, appears Berglund is in Housley's doghouse. Good face off man, not much else, especially speed. He his PAINFULLY slow on the ice. And he really screwed the pooch on Vegas's first goal the other night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, plenzmd1 said:

and why does he wear his pants so tight!!! jJohn, you be showing your age?

Prolly took him 20 minutes to get it to look just like that!

 

.!Should see what my kid's hair look like when he saunters out of the house in the morning!

These dam self-absorbed  millennials with their freaking devices get on my nerves. Although they are incapable of holding a conversation but can type texts like demons on their new expensive cell phones. If I see any of them on my lawn I'm getting the shot gun out! :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, K-9 said:

Uh-oh, appears Berglund is in Housley's doghouse. Good face off man, not much else, especially speed. He his PAINFULLY slow on the ice. And he really screwed the pooch on Vegas's first goal the other night. 

He looked like he had a serious Vegas hangover... he was half dead during that game. 

I remember At. Louis fans saying he had a reputation as a bit of a party boy, so it wouldn’t surprise me if that were indeed the case. 

 

I know Berglund missed practice after the LV game. Housley said he was banged up. So it could also be in part due to injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could not have drawn up a worst start. 4 minute major in the first two minutes of play, two power play goals against and counting. 

Great. Another penalty. This team blows chunks. 

Edited by K-9
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kyle Okposo is a liability and that's as polite as I can say it. A lazy high sticking penalty to start the game that cost us two PP goals against and he has NO business being on the first PP unit. He makes crap passes, takes shots too easily stopped, and is a drag to the rest of the unit. 

 

Housley continues to be clueless with this team. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much better period, but the clueless, poor decision making continues. Kudos to Bogo with five blocks through two. 

 

Pominville can join Okposo on waivers. They are both dead weights on this team. Their experience is great, but their best days are behind them and they can't hack it any longer. 

 

The poor decisions, across all the lines and d pairs continues to baffle. How can a team be so collectively stupid, so consistently? If that's not preparation, I don't know what is. That's coaching more than anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First Sabres game I watched in a long time....and it looks exactly like every other Sabres game I've watched for the last quarter century:  the other team skates and passes circles around the Sabres up and down the ice for 60 minutes with Buffalo hanging around for as long as the goalie can stand on his head.   They seriously haven't completed two consecutive passes of longer than six feet this period.

 

I'll make a note to check in on them again in two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, K-9 said:

Could not have drawn up a worst start. 4 minute major in the first two minutes of play, two power play goals against and counting. 

Great. Another penalty. This team blows chunks. 

1

and Chunks is my dog!!!!

7 hours ago, K-9 said:

Scandella needs to watch a few games from the box. His season has been absolute crap and he's playing his worst game tonight. Pathetic. 

he yaps a good game..and sucks. Get the young fellas up soon and make these guys accountable.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 26CornerBlitz changed the title to Sabres & NHL 2018-19 - Game 8 vs. LAK at 4 PM ET on 10/20
8 hours ago, KD in CA said:

First Sabres game I watched in a long time....and it looks exactly like every other Sabres game I've watched for the last quarter century:  the other team skates and passes circles around the Sabres up and down the ice for 60 minutes with Buffalo hanging around for as long as the goalie can stand on his head.   They seriously haven't completed two consecutive passes of longer than six feet this period.

 

I'll make a note to check in on them again in two years.

 

Don't forget the Sabres falling down as if they are just learning to skate. It's freaking ponderous. What is it about this city lately? Athletes come here and literally forget how to play and coaches forget how to coach. It's a gypsy's curse.

1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

 

 

Start with cutting Kyle Okposo. Of course he'll go on to score 50 goals on his new team.

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Don't forget the Sabres falling down as if they are just learning to skate. It's freaking ponderous. What is it about this city lately? Athletes come here and literally forget how to play and coaches forget how to coach. It's a gypsy's curse.

 

Start with cutting Kyle Okposo. Of course he'll go on to score 50 goals on his new team.

There isn't any curse. When all is said and done it comes down to who has the most talent. When you have a deficit of it and you are not the hardest working team on the ice then the outcome is predictable. When your effort is lackluster game after game then something is systemically wrong. The worst indictment that someone can make about a sports team is that they are a bore. And that's exactly what they are as a team and a franchise. It's just the same shiiit over and over. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't picture them going anywhere until Dahlin starts to approach the superstar status that everyone expects from him.  Until then, we'll have to sit through a ton of inconsistent hockey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bray Wyatt said:

I fell asleep after the 2nd period, wtf happened??

 

Same here.  I liked what I saw in the 2nd, and thought it would carry over into 3rd.  Then wake up to see they gave up 3 goals?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, plenzmd1 said:

and Chunks is my dog!!!!

he yaps a good game..and sucks. Get the young fellas up soon and make these guys accountable.

That is a GREAT name for a dog. 

3 hours ago, JohnC said:

There isn't any curse. When all is said and done it comes down to who has the most talent. When you have a deficit of it and you are not the hardest working team on the ice then the outcome is predictable. When your effort is lackluster game after game then something is systemically wrong. The worst indictment that someone can make about a sports team is that they are a bore. And that's exactly what they are as a team and a franchise. It's just the same shiiit over and over. 

With this team, it's less a question of working hard than it is of working smart. It's uncanny how often so many of these players don't make the smart, simple play. Effort can overcome many shortcomings sometimes, but stupidity is seldom one of them. Bad decision after bad decision and by guys (I'm looking at you Scandella and Okposo) who are team leaders and expected to know better. If that's not a reflection on the coaching, what is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, K-9 said:

 

With this team, it's less a question of working hard than it is of working smart. It's uncanny how often so many of these players don't make the smart, simple play. Effort can overcome many shortcomings sometimes, but stupidity is seldom one of them. Bad decision after bad decision and by guys (I'm looking at you Scandella and Okposo) who are team leaders and expected to know better. If that's not a reflection on the coaching, what is?

Coaches can't play for the players. But what they can control is who plays and who sits. Something is amiss when the problems are the same, over and over. I didn't watch the Shark game but I did see the first period of the Vegas game. You don't have to know much about hockey to recognize that the opposing team was much more tenacious and played with urgency. This is the big league. When you have a defensive lapse you are going to pay for it. And most of their lapses are glaring mistakes that shouldn't be tolerated. 

 

Hockey is a fast paced sport. There are going to be mistakes. But you have to respond and continue on. It just seems that this team is incapable of reacting when things are not going well. What I have noticed is if the first period is going well that it indicates how the game is going to unfold for the rest of the game. There is a sameness to this team that makes it understandable why fans are steadily peeling off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JohnC said:

Coaches can't play for the players. But what they can control is who plays and who sits. Something is amiss when the problems are the same, over and over. I didn't watch the Shark game but I did see the first period of the Vegas game. You don't have to know much about hockey to recognize that the opposing team was much more tenacious and played with urgency. This is the big league. When you have a defensive lapse you are going to pay for it. And most of their lapses are glaring mistakes that shouldn't be tolerated. 

 

Hockey is a fast paced sport. There are going to be mistakes. But you have to respond and continue on. It just seems that this team is incapable of reacting when things are not going well. What I have noticed is if the first period is going well that it indicates how the game is going to unfold for the rest of the game. There is a sameness to this team that makes it understandable why fans are steadily peeling off. 

No, coaches can't play. But as a life long believer in "you play like you practice" I have to wonder about Housley's attention to detail. Last week, after getting their ***** handed to them by the Rockies, Okposo said something was "off" in practice and that he should have said something. Housley said practice went well. What gives? 

 

While many of their mistakes are of the glaring variety, it's the consistently stupid, little mistakes they make that often leads to disaster. It's mind boggling how stupid these players are on the ice at times. These happen regularly and, again, that points to preparation and coaching in my book. 

 

Here's a concerning thing for me as well: our top line D pair consists of a 2nd pair talent (Risto) and a 3rd pair talent (Scandella). That spells disaster in my book. Now Housley can't do much about acquiring the talent to compensate and that will have to wait, but he's got to stop acting like he has the group he had in Nashville and make necessary adjustments in the meantime. So far, he has shown NO propensity for doing so. Yet another coaching failure on his part, imo. 

 

Anyway, the clock is ticking towards 10/31. Teams that are out of a playoff spot by four or more points on Halloween, miss the playoffs 87% of the time. If I had ANY more faith in Housley's ability to get his finger on the pulse of this team and make the right corrections, like removing Okposo from the PP and having Scandella sit a game or two, I'd have more faith that we would be in that rare 13% segment that do make the playoffs. 

 

But I don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JohnC said:

Coaches can't play for the players. But what they can control is who plays and who sits. Something is amiss when the problems are the same, over and over. I didn't watch the Shark game but I did see the first period of the Vegas game. You don't have to know much about hockey to recognize that the opposing team was much more tenacious and played with urgency. This is the big league. When you have a defensive lapse you are going to pay for it. And most of their lapses are glaring mistakes that shouldn't be tolerated. 

 

Hockey is a fast paced sport. There are going to be mistakes. But you have to respond and continue on. It just seems that this team is incapable of reacting when things are not going well. What I have noticed is if the first period is going well that it indicates how the game is going to unfold for the rest of the game. There is a sameness to this team that makes it understandable why fans are steadily peeling off. 

Housley is the wrong coach for this team, but the team is poorly constructed as it turns out.

 

We have a core that is very similar to the discarded old Rochester core that began this rebuild.  We've come full circle and have a group of players that are very similar.  

 

I.E., we need a new coach, yet that won't solve our problems.  

 

We hoped Eichel would be another Crosby type; he's more like Pierre Turgeon.

 

And like Pierre, Eichel may well be traded at some point, if we can get the right return.  Who knows.

 

The thought of that is not unthinkable, but it should be.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, K-9 said:

No, coaches can't play. But as a life long believer in "you play like you practice" I have to wonder about Housley's attention to detail. Last week, after getting their ***** handed to them by the Rockies, Okposo said something was "off" in practice and that he should have said something. Housley said practice went well. What gives? 

 

While many of their mistakes are of the glaring variety, it's the consistently stupid, little mistakes they make that often leads to disaster. It's mind boggling how stupid these players are on the ice at times. These happen regularly and, again, that points to preparation and coaching in my book. 

 

Here's a concerning thing for me as well: our top line D pair consists of a 2nd pair talent (Risto) and a 3rd pair talent (Scandella). That spells disaster in my book. Now Housley can't do much about acquiring the talent to compensate and that will have to wait, but he's got to stop acting like he has the group he had in Nashville and make necessary adjustments in the meantime. So far, he has shown NO propensity for doing so. Yet another coaching failure on his part, imo. 

 

Anyway, the clock is ticking towards 10/31. Teams that are out of a playoff spot by four or more points on Halloween, miss the playoffs 87% of the time. If I had ANY more faith in Housley's ability to get his finger on the pulse of this team and make the right corrections, like removing Okposo from the PP and having Scandella sit a game or two, I'd have more faith that we would be in that rare 13% segment that do make the playoffs. 

 

But I don't. 

I expect Guhle will be called up in the not too distant future. Defensemen are at a premium and not easily attainable on the market. I agree with you that Risto is more suited as a second pairing defenseman. But on this team with a dearth of talent back there he is playing extraordinary minutes that would usually go to a premium backliner, which he is not. Usually, when you don't have the requisite talent you can't hide it. It catches up to you. On our roster we have too many players who are playing on higher lines and defensive pairings than they should be playing. 

 

I'm not as critical of Housley as you are. In my estimation what this franchise doesn't need is another coaching time, at least right now. Could you imagine if a Torterella or Babcock was coaching this team? The sparks would be flying and players would be held more accountable via playing time. 

1 minute ago, Fadingpain said:

Housley is the wrong coach for this team, but the team is poorly constructed as it turns out.

 

We have a core that is very similar to the discarded old Rochester core that began this rebuild.  We've come full circle and have a group of players that are very similar.  

 

I.E., we need a new coach, yet that won't solve our problems.  

 

We hoped Eichel would be another Crosby type; he's more like Pierre Turgeon.

 

And like Pierre, Eichel may well be traded at some point, if we can get the right return.  Who knows.

 

The thought of that is not unthinkable, but it should be.

 

 

 

 

Housley may not be the right coach but if the source of the malaise is the roster then the mix needs to be changed. My fear is that this franchise has gone through too many coaching changes that don't ultimately change the course of the team. My belief is that although this team has added talent from the low baseline of the prior years more talent still needs to be added to get to be a seriously competing team. We're just not there yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JohnC said:

I expect Guhle will be called up in the not too distant future. Defensemen are at a premium and not easily attainable on the market. I agree with you that Risto is more suited as a second pairing defenseman. But on this team with a dearth of talent back there he is playing extraordinary minutes that would usually go to a premium backliner, which he is not. Usually, when you don't have the requisite talent you can't hide it. It catches up to you. On our roster we have too many players who are playing on higher lines and defensive pairings than they should be playing. 

 

I'm not as critical of Housley as you are. In my estimation what this franchise doesn't need is another coaching time, at least right now. Could you imagine if a Torterella or Babcock was coaching this team? The sparks would be flying and players would be held more accountable via playing time. 

Why aren't they held accountable now, then? Scandella has sucked all season. WTF is Housley waiting for? And Okposo continuing to screw up PP 1? Housley, that's why. 

 

I submit it's either because Housley is blind to the obvious or is afraid to exert pressure on (presumed) team leadership. 

 

Nothing he has shown to date suggests to me he is a qualified NHL head coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, K-9 said:

Why aren't they held accountable now, then? Scandella has sucked all season. WTF is Housley waiting for? And Okposo continuing to screw up PP 1? Housley, that's why. 

 

I submit it's either because Housley is blind to the obvious or is afraid to exert pressure on (presumed) team leadership. 

 

Nothing he has shown to date suggests to me he is a qualified NHL head coach. 

Right now who is the option to him? I'm not saying that he is the right coach for this team but making a change right now could even more destabilize an unstable team. This is a mentally fragile team. I don't see who on the roster can internally impose some order. I'm not sure Jack at this point has the ability to be the authoritative voice in the room. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnC said:

Right now who is the option to him? I'm not saying that he is the right coach for this team but making a change right now could even more destabilize an unstable team. This is a mentally fragile team. I don't see who on the roster can internally impose some order. I'm not sure Jack at this point has the ability to be the authoritative voice in the room. 

Then he shouldn't be wearing the C, which Housley had a voice in awarding. There's a leadership void anyway, as evidenced by Okposo's admission that he should have said something at practice last week, but didn't. 

 

If this team is so mentally fragile, then changing coaches is even more of an emergency. 

 

I'm not sure who is out there to replace him. If we are more than four points out at the end of the month, it won't matter, historically. But we can't just keep him for the sake of keeping him, either. He's not a good coach. Why subject these young players to more of his ineptitude during a lost cause of a season, anyway? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, K-9 said:

Then he shouldn't be wearing the C, which Housley had a voice in awarding. There's a leadership void anyway, as evidenced by Okposo's admission that he should have said something at practice last week, but didn't. 

 

If this team is so mentally fragile, then changing coaches is even more of an emergency. 

 

I'm not sure who is out there to replace him. If we are more than four points out at the end of the month, it won't matter, historically. But we can't just keep him for the sake of keeping him, either. He's not a good coach. Why subject these young players to more of his ineptitude during a lost cause of a season, anyway? 

 

 

Chris Taylor is coaching the Amerks for a reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

Chris Taylor is coaching the Amerks for a reason. 

I honestly don't know much about Taylor at all. Got them to the playoffs last year and has them playing well so far this year, anyway. 

 

But can he get more out of Scandella or Okposo? I don't think anyone can, which is why they need to sit, imo. Housley doesn't seem to have the stones to do that, though. Even though it's obviously needed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...