Jump to content

La Canfora: Bills Betting "Big" on Allen and Edmunds


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Limeaid said:

 

Hulking?  He is tall but 240 is NOT a lot that big.  At his height you expect him to be at least 230.  Almost all of his tackles are taller than him.

LaConjecture is conjecturing again not reporting.

Cam is 6'5 245.  Josh is  6'5 240

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said:

The Bills "betting big" on two first rounders that they traded up for??? No way!

 

I had no idea!  Thank goodness for quality journalism that keeps us informed!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

 

Yet another guy that views completion percentage as a direct reflection of accuracy. I have a hard time giving these guys credit when they do this, as well as bringing up completion percentages of college QBs from 20-40 years ago. I don't care that he was a scout. 

 

And he writes for a website with poor editing. 

Edited by Drunken Pygmy Goat
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said:

 

Yet another guy that equates completion percentage as a direct reflection of accuracy. I have a hard time giving these guys credit when they do this, as well as bringing up completion percentages of college QBs from 20-40 years ago. I don't care that he was a scout. 

 

And he writes for a website with poor editing. 

 

He's attributing the inaccuracy issue to bad footwork which leads to lower completion %.  Totally valid point.

 

I'll be eagerly waiting for DPG pieces with all relevant content and zero errors since you seem to be such a critic.  ;)

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

He's attributing the inaccuracy issue to bad footwork which leads to lower completion %.  Totally valid point.

 

I'll be eagerly waiting for DPG pieces with all relevant content and zero errors since you seem to be such a critic.  ;)

 

Sorry, just seems like another lazy, regurgitated piece to me, Greg.

 

Why bring up Vick, Kelly, and Favre? Simply because they had poor completion percentages in college, just like Allen? Did they, too, have footwork issues that led to those numbers? I'm sure they did at times, just like pretty much every QB ever, but there's no mention of that in the article, in relation to their completion percentages. Could be that the talent around them played a role, among other things, not to mention that the game was different back then.

 

Comparing QBs from different eras is foolish, especially when comparing numbers. I get the point he (you?) was trying to make, but I feel like I've read this article before, several times, from several different journalists. Got a click from me, though...

 

And he didn't provide any examples, or what may have led to bad footwork on a given play. And he also didn't attribute all bad throws to bad footwork. Not saying that he should have, but what were the issues on those plays, if not footwork? Do those issues support his article in any way, or were they conveniently left out???

 

I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers. I'm just tired of reading the same things, I guess. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Drunken Pygmy Goat said:

 

Sorry, just seems like another lazy, regurgitated piece to me, Greg.

 

Why bring up Vick, Kelly, and Favre? Simply because they had poor completion percentages in college, just like Allen? Did they, too, have footwork issues that led to those numbers? I'm sure they did at times, just like pretty much every QB ever, but there's no mention of that in the article, in relation to their completion percentages. Could be that the talent around them played a role, among other things, not to mention that the game was different back then.

 

Comparing QBs from different eras is foolish, especially when comparing numbers. I get the point he (you?) was trying to make, but I feel like I've read this article before, several times, from several different journalists. Got a click from me, though...

 

And he didn't provide any examples, or what may have led to bad footwork on a given play. And he also didn't attribute all bad throws to bad footwork. Not saying that he should have, but what were the issues on those plays, if not footwork? Do those issues support his article in any way, or were they conveniently left out???

 

I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers. I'm just tired of reading the same things, I guess. 

 

No feather ruffling here.  At this juncture, you aren't going to get much ground breaking analysis from analysts who critique Allen so I'm not sure what you expect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

No feather ruffling here.  At this juncture, you aren't going to get much ground breaking analysis from analysts who critique Allen so I'm not sure what you expect. 

 

Yeah, it's that time of year. Chalk it up to me yelling at clouds.

 

Btw, I appreciate what you do here. If there's anything posted on the internet, you (and Yolo) are quick to post them here. 

Edited by Drunken Pygmy Goat
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cliff's Notes version:

 

Buffalo Bills are Betting Big on Physically Gifted Rookies Josh Allen and Tremaine Edmunds

ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. -- Football players are really big. First round draft picks are important and the people who pick them expect them to do well.
 

5-31: Jason La Canfora, CBS Sports, on One Bills Live (14:52)

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

Wow bashing a journalist again.  You guys are so original. Maybe you can spend some time bashing a random bill now.  

 

No one is bashing him.

 

We're just bashing the fluff garbage that he wrote.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

So, that makes this “revelation” breaking news?

 

My 5 year old grandson could have made the same assessment.  

But he didn't. Proving once again:

 

LaConjecture>Your 5 Year Old Grandson 

 

At least in reporting NFL Conjecture.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...