Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
26CornerBlitz

Charles Robinson: Bills Looking to Move into the Top Five - Deal Could Take Place at Owners' Meetings

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
March 25-28 Annual League Meeting, Orlando, Florida.
Edited by 26CornerBlitz
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, No Place To Hyde said:

Charles "Captain Obvious" Robinson

You want a raise for that scoop, Charles?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting they say top 5. If we wanted Rosen or Darnold that wouldn't be enough. This makes me wonder if Mayfield is the real target. The only QB I haven't seen us tied to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mark Vader said:

You want a raise for that scoop, Charles?

 

Gives us an idea of a time frame:

Talks are expected to materialize after first week of free agency and intensify at the Orlando owner's meetings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Gives us an idea of a time frame:

Talks are expected to materialize after first week of free agency and intensify at the Orlando owner's meetings.

Fine, I'll give him a gold star for the details, but not the headline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

It's interesting they say top 5. If we wanted Rosen or Darnold that wouldn't be enough. This makes me wonder if Mayfield is the real target. The only QB I haven't seen us tied to.

Most likely trade partners are colts, browns and giants.  Bean probably has at least 2 guys he likes.  Any of those slots would work, but I’d love to see him get his top guy.

 

Whoever that is.  Could even be Mayfield for all we know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mrbojanglezs said:

how does one intensify a talk?

Simple. You TURN ON CAPS LOCK AND ADD SOME 👿👿👿 of those little buggers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, elltrain22 said:

When is the owner's meeting??

 

March 25-28 Annual League Meeting, Orlando, Florida.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

It's interesting they say top 5. If we wanted Rosen or Darnold that wouldn't be enough. This makes me wonder if Mayfield is the real target. The only QB I haven't seen us tied to.

Top 5 doesn't mean 5 though. Could be wording it that way to cover his bases. Pick 2 for instance can be considered a "top 5" pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

It's interesting they say top 5. If we wanted Rosen or Darnold that wouldn't be enough. This makes me wonder if Mayfield is the real target. The only QB I haven't seen us tied to.

 

To me, it says that they would be fine with 2-3 of the QBs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

It's interesting they say top 5. If we wanted Rosen or Darnold that wouldn't be enough. This makes me wonder if Mayfield is the real target. The only QB I haven't seen us tied to.

Didn't that happen with Peterman as well? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

It's interesting they say top 5. If we wanted Rosen or Darnold that wouldn't be enough. This makes me wonder if Mayfield is the real target. The only QB I haven't seen us tied to.

I'm good with any of the 3. I have my preferences, but I will put my faith in the Billls new brain trust to get this right. They've been very smart about their moves so far (IMO) and have a lot of top end tsl not evaluators on staff. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No surprise.


Trading up to 12 is nice but doesn't net us a top QB.  Seems evident that Beane intends to go up higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

 

Down for this!

 

 

18 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

Would rather top 3. Guarantees Rosen/Mayfield/Darnold. 

 

Probably will , just don't have that info yet.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they are. 

 

Otherwise itll really suck if they miss out on the top 3 QBs in this draft as well as seemingly already missing out on all of the decent free agent QBs, and not even having Tyrod as a placeholder option anymore. 

 

If the QB draft class looked better next year I wouldn't be as worried because I'd say "hey, maybe we'll get a high pick next year and get our QB then". But the QB class looks like garbage outside of (basically) 1 guy, so.... 

 

Yeah, it's looking more and more like they have no choice but to go all in on a QB in the draft this year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

#1 Cleveland, #2 NY Giants, #3 Indy, #4 Cleveland, #5 Denver, #6 NY Jets. All want a QB and Buffalo may need to go up to #2,#3 to get one of the top three. 

 

Buffalo looks to be filling the holes on the team with free agent signings and still might need to sign a bridge QB. Most of the good ones are already gone. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Buffalo may not need to go further than pick #5, if they are not sold on any of the four qbs as being head and shoulde above the others. The worst case scenario in this instance would likely  be Barkley at rb gets picked among the top 5, leaving three qbs before that 5th pick. Beane then has an easier qb choice to make, and can be blamed less if that quarterback fails.. However, if Beane definitely wants a certain qb, likely moving up at least to 2nd spot would be preferred, unless the GMs of Cleveland, Giants and Colts tell us of any of their specific quarterback plans. Unlikely. I think pick #3 would very likely give Buffalo one of their top rated 2 qbs prospects..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

It's interesting they say top 5. If we wanted Rosen or Darnold that wouldn't be enough. This makes me wonder if Mayfield is the real target. The only QB I haven't seen us tied to.

We've been tied to every single one of those rookies at one time or another.  Depending on which media talking head you listen to or read.  It's like throwing darts at a dart board.

 

All smoke and mirrors at this point.  Smoke and mirrors...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×