JMF2006 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Might be a FA QB or another trade. Who knows but the wheels are in motion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt_In_NH Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 I’m all for the bills trading up but I hope they keep their first rounder for next year. If they crap the bed it could be a good pick for another qb if they swing and miss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 So the question is; did the bills trade for Tyrod for a third and have residual good faith implications that helps a move up to obtain #4. maybe. Business is about relationships. Maybe. Deep and good thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffAlone Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: So the question is; did the bills trade for Tyrod for a third and have residual good faith implications that helps a move up to obtain #4. maybe. Business is about relationships. Maybe. Deep and good thought. #21,22,56 and the 3rd they just gave us should do it. It just may well prove to be all about relationships, like we should all have known Edited March 10, 2018 by BuffAlone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Finkel Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 9 minutes ago, mattynh said: I’m all for the bills trading up but I hope they keep their first rounder for next year. If they crap the bed it could be a good pick for another qb if they swing and miss. I believe acquiring the pick from Cleveland will allow us to keep #1 next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 #21 / #22 / #53 / #56 / #65 = 2,555 points #2 = 2,600 points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezertbill Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 I believe the Bills have assigned a draft value to each of the FA they have signed thus far. Vontae Davis has a draft pick value, same for Ivory and the LB form the Giants. All of these FA signings will not be involved in the compensatory formula. So if the Bills assigned Davis a 3rd round grade, then that 3rd round pick can then be traded away without loss of value. So let's just assign Davis a 3rd round grade, Ivory a 4th round grade, and the Giants LB a 6th round grade. Those picks will then be traded away to move up or acquire other players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat68 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Chuck Wagon said: #21 / #22 / #53 / #56 / #65 = 2,555 points #2 = 2,600 points I think glenn would be apart of it and you could keep 53 or 56. I believe it is a possibility. I am surprised Taylor was traded without anyone else on the roster. I think they either have a trade working or have a wink and nod agreement in place with a FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 And they get Tyrod minus 6.5M to pay that the Bills will suck up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swnybillsfan Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 hour ago, Green Lightning said: Who knows! But let me tell you isn't everybody pretty damn excited! indeed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manther Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 59 minutes ago, kdiggz said: Browns are most definitely taking Barkley at #1 now. Having Tyrod let's them take a QB at 4 and still get a very good rookie they can groom I hope I missed the sarcasm. One because I hope I missed the sarcasm. Two for the Browns. They don't deserve that. Dorsey is picking a QB with #1 or #4. Or a trade down or up to #2 or #3. He just is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 (edited) If its the giants they want 1 this year and another 1st rd next year for sure. Cleveland already has 3 2nd rd picks, if they sell. 4 do they really want more picks all in this draft or do they want to spread that over to next year themselves Edited March 10, 2018 by ddaryl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 29 minutes ago, Manther said: I hope I missed the sarcasm. One because I hope I missed the sarcasm. Two for the Browns. They don't deserve that. Dorsey is picking a QB with #1 or #4. Or a trade down or up to #2 or #3. He just is. Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What a Tuel Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 hour ago, Chuck Wagon said: #21 / #22 / #53 / #56 / #65 = 2,555 points #2 = 2,600 points I think they split it up between years, but yeah, this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearLess Price Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 3 hours ago, kdiggz said: Browns are most definitely taking Barkley at #1 now. Having Tyrod let's them take a QB at 4 and still get a very good rookie they can groom This is Def the plan for them. It could honestly set the browns up for the next 3 years if Barkley is as good as advertised and they pick the right QB at 4. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts