Jump to content

The Thread For Greg's Stashes


3rdnlng

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 
LONG-AWAITED LES NESSMAN, ALFRED HITCHCOCK PROJECT FINALLY GREEN-LIT: 
 
 
.

 

And that community?  Toms River, NJ.

 

Literally, toms turkeys terrorizing Toms River.   Thanks, 2019, for being the most bizarre, surreal year ever.  :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, B-Man said:
LONG-AWAITED LES NESSMAN, ALFRED HITCHCOCK PROJECT FINALLY GREEN-LIT: 
 
 
.

 

There are at least 3 different flocks of 20+ turkeys that live in my neighborhood. They tear up yards, schiff everywhere, and are incredibly loud (it sounds like a damn jungle every morning when they are starting their morning rounds). With that said, I don't really mind them all that much, and it's kind of fun seeing them, especially the chicks each spring, and when the larger ones try to awkwardly fly. I've seen them hit the sides of vehicles when trying to get enough clearance to go over traffic. Most won't attempt to fly over a busy road, however, so there usually ends up being 1 or 2 males with there feathers all poofed out acting as crossing guards. It's actually amazing how few dead ones there are on the sides of roads, but that can probably be attributed to locals being used to them.

 

And they at least learn to stay out of your back yard if you have a dog (some do learn the hard way, which actually makes it quite effective).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

There are at least 3 different flocks of 20+ turkeys that live in my neighborhood. They tear up yards, schiff everywhere, and are incredibly loud (it sounds like a damn jungle every morning when they are starting their morning rounds). With that said, I don't really mind them all that much, and it's kind of fun seeing them, especially the chicks each spring, and when the larger ones try to awkwardly fly. I've seen them hit the sides of vehicles when trying to get enough clearance to go over traffic. Most won't attempt to fly over a busy road, however, so there usually ends up being 1 or 2 males with there feathers all poofed out acting as crossing guards. It's actually amazing how few dead ones there are on the sides of roads, but that can probably be attributed to locals being used to them.

 

And they at least learn to stay out of your back yard if you have a dog (some do learn the hard way, which actually makes it quite effective).


? ? ?

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure where to put this post.  I wanted to save it for future copy and pasting.

 

 

DR is on ignore for me.  Thanks for the support.  Yeah, he knows he is on ignore and so likes to use that opportunity to appear to have the last and definitive word.  I have tried to take him off ignore several times but time after time, he proves he can't really control himself.  He cannot seem to disagree without badgering and insulting.  He cannot seem to accept a 'let us wait and see' stance.  Realizing he didn't deserve the second/third/fourth chances, I put him back on ignore.

 

I truly believe that once he was an honest researcher but somewhere along the line, he lost his objectivity.  He has fallen into the narrative that Trump was wronged by everyone that suspected there might be wrongdoing in his 2016 campaign.  His flawed logic seems to go that since Trump was wronged then and Mueller did not find sufficient evidence to bring any conspiracy charges, that the guy is a now proven saint.  The story goes that Trump was illegally investigated and so any future investigations are therefore also unwarranted and in fact, illegitimate attempts to overthrow the President.  I did mentioned flawed, right?

 

When he has no good answer, DR provides torrents of unasked answers and has done just that when supposedly answering this question.  I have never seen a location or office holding these surveillance tapes nor an explanation of why none have surfaced anywhere in anyone's hearing or trial or why none have been leaked.   He cuts and pastes pages of chaff essentially.  Others do this too but DR overwhelms with his prolific 'research'.  Fine research perhaps, but often not really answers.  Then too, he has been on ignore so I may have missed it but at this point this appears to just be another DR lie.

 

So, to summarize.....His opinions are facts.  Your facts are just ill informed opinions.  Basically he is too brilliant and his logic flawless.  No one knows more.  Since he puts in the most time on research, he must know the most truth.  No one else's sources of information are credible.  If a source was credible but now states anything negative against the President, they are now evil and no longer credible.

 

Oh, and if you read or watch CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, BBC, MSNBC, among others, you support pedophiles and likely are a pedophile.  Did I mention 'flawed'?

Edited by Bob in Mich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said:

Not sure where to put this post.  I wanted to save it for future copy and pasting.

 

 

DR is on ignore for me.  Thanks for the support.  Yeah, he knows he is on ignore and so likes to use that opportunity to appear to have the last and definitive word.  I have tried to take him off ignore several times but time after time, he proves he can't really control himself.  He cannot seem to disagree without badgering and insulting.  He cannot seem to accept a 'let us wait and see' stance.  Realizing he didn't deserve the second/third/fourth chances, I put him back on ignore.

 

I truly believe that once he was an honest researcher but somewhere along the line, he lost his objectivity.  He has fallen into the narrative that Trump was wronged by everyone that suspected there might be wrongdoing in his 2016 campaign.  His flawed logic seems to go that since Trump was wronged then and Mueller did not find sufficient evidence to bring any conspiracy charges, that the guy is a now proven saint.  The story goes that Trump was illegally investigated and so any future investigations are therefore also unwarranted and in fact, illegitimate attempts to overthrow the President.  I did mentioned flawed, right?

 

When he has no good answer, DR provides torrents of unasked answers and has done just that when supposedly answering this question.  I have never seen a location or office holding these surveillance tapes nor an explanation of why none have surfaced anywhere in anyone's hearing or trial or why none have been leaked.   He cuts and pastes pages of chaffe essentially.  Others do this too but DR overwhelms with his prolific 'research'.  Fine research perhaps, but often not really answers.  Then too, he has been on ignore so I may have missed it but at this point this appears to just be another DR lie.

 

So, to summarize.....His opinions are facts.  Your facts are just ill informed opinions.  Basically he is too brilliant and his logic flawless.  No one knows more.  Since he puts in the most time on research, he must know the most truth.  No one else's sources of information are credible.  If a source was credible but now states anything negative against the President, they are now evil and no longer credible.

 

Oh, and if you read or watch CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, BBC, MSNBC, among others, you support pedophiles and likely are a pedophile.  Did I mention 'flawed'?

 

You should probably put it in your pot thread, with all your other mindless stoner drivel.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said:

Not sure where to put this post.  I wanted to save it for future copy and pasting.

 

 

DR is on ignore for me.  Thanks for the support.  Yeah, he knows he is on ignore and so likes to use that opportunity to appear to have the last and definitive word.  I have tried to take him off ignore several times but time after time, he proves he can't really control himself.  He cannot seem to disagree without badgering and insulting.  He cannot seem to accept a 'let us wait and see' stance.  Realizing he didn't deserve the second/third/fourth chances, I put him back on ignore.

 

I truly believe that once he was an honest researcher but somewhere along the line, he lost his objectivity.  He has fallen into the narrative that Trump was wronged by everyone that suspected there might be wrongdoing in his 2016 campaign.  His flawed logic seems to go that since Trump was wronged then and Mueller did not find sufficient evidence to bring any conspiracy charges, that the guy is a now proven saint.  The story goes that Trump was illegally investigated and so any future investigations are therefore also unwarranted and in fact, illegitimate attempts to overthrow the President.  I did mentioned flawed, right?

 

When he has no good answer, DR provides torrents of unasked answers and has done just that when supposedly answering this question.  I have never seen a location or office holding these surveillance tapes nor an explanation of why none have surfaced anywhere in anyone's hearing or trial or why none have been leaked.   He cuts and pastes pages of chaffe essentially.  Others do this too but DR overwhelms with his prolific 'research'.  Fine research perhaps, but often not really answers.  Then too, he has been on ignore so I may have missed it but at this point this appears to just be another DR lie.

 

So, to summarize.....His opinions are facts.  Your facts are just ill informed opinions.  Basically he is too brilliant and his logic flawless.  No one knows more.  Since he puts in the most time on research, he must know the most truth.  No one else's sources of information are credible.  If a source was credible but now states anything negative against the President, they are now evil and no longer credible.

 

Oh, and if you read or watch CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, BBC, MSNBC, among others, you support pedophiles and likely are a pedophile.  Did I mention 'flawed'?

 

This from the guy who can’t (wont) provide one post where I lied or did any of the above. 

 

And from a guy guy who has asked — for days — a question about “where are the tapes” involving the spying on Trump while ignoring the answers provided because they’re uncomfortable to his world view. 

 

@Bob in Mich continues to prove he’s a clown. Unable to think for himself. Unable to defend his positions other than to launch smears and false claims against others. 

 

Don’t be like Bob, a burned out stoned who’s proud of his own ignorance. Be better than Bob. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

This from the guy who can’t (wont) provide one post where I lied or did any of the above. 

 

And from a guy guy who has asked — for days — a question about “where are the tapes” involving the spying on Trump while ignoring the answers provided because they’re uncomfortable to his world view. 

 

@Bob in Mich continues to prove he’s a clown. Unable to think for himself. Unable to defend his positions other than to launch smears and false claims against others. 

 

Don’t be like Bob, a burned out stoned who’s proud of his own ignorance. Be better than Bob. 

 

It's cute how he berates you for several days, then puts you on ignore and claims you're the problem.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

You should probably put it in your pot thread, with all your other mindless stoner drivel.

 

Thanks for that suggestion, but no.  You have put so much mindless idiotic drivel in that post already, it needs no more.

 

In fact now that you mention it, you and DR may have the same mental disorder.  I recall pleading with you on several occasions to stop replying to my posts in that thread but to no avail.  You persisted to post insults and added nothing to the thread. 

 

Maybe it is time to admit you were a complete ignorant troll in that thread.  I mean you were not just a medical cannabis doubter, you essentially ridiculed anyone that could think it had promise.  I don't expect an apology.  I know you have your image here of a pompous prick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

This from the guy who can’t (wont) provide one post where I lied or did any of the above. 

 

And from a guy guy who has asked — for days — a question about “where are the tapes” involving the spying on Trump while ignoring the answers provided because they’re uncomfortable to his world view. 

 

@Bob in Mich continues to prove he’s a clown. Unable to think for himself. Unable to defend his positions other than to launch smears and false claims against others. 

 

Don’t be like Bob, a burned out stoned who’s proud of his own ignorance. Be better than Bob. 

 

Ready for the wedding! Who is the best man?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Thanks for that suggestion, but no.  You have put so much mindless idiotic drivel in that post already, it needs no more.

 

In fact now that you mention it, you and DR may have the same mental disorder.  I recall pleading with you on several occasions to stop replying to my posts in that thread but to no avail.  You persisted to post insults and added nothing to the thread. 

 

Maybe it is time to admit you were a complete ignorant troll in that thread.  I mean you were not just a medical cannabis doubter, you essentially ridiculed anyone that could think it had promise.  I don't expect an apology.  I know you have your image here of a pompous prick. 

 

I'm not blocked?  Why has your idiotic stoner ass not blocked me already?  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another post I would like to keep for future reference  Hope this is the right spot for these.

 

 

DR, why can't you control yourself?  I have told you several times that discussions with you always seem to devolve into you, the crazy eyed guy at the bar, being way too close in my face screaming about lizard people!  Yet, here we are again. 

 

Over the last 4-5 pages in this thread you asked me the exact same question approximately 10 times.  I answered it at least 7 times, pointed out that I had already answered it repeatedly, gave you a link to more detail, and warned you to stop the repetition or you would go back on ignore.  That happened....go back and look if you doubt.  You then quickly asked the same question twice more and then got put on ignore.  You claim to be innocently just asking but when THE SAME QUESTION IS ASKED AND ANSWERED 10 TIMES YOU ARE HARASSING, NOT CONVERSING.  That is you being the crazy eyed guy at the bar AGAIN.  Recognize that please!

 

As I have told you, I would rather not engage with you.  I have literally begged you many times to stop replying to me unless you are quoted.  YOU WILL NOT ABIDE BY THAT VERY REASONABLE REQUEST.   That is a little twisted and certainly not right, imo.  I should be allowed to carry on conversations with other posters without you interjecting yourself but your butting in regularly takes over the conversation.  YOUR REPLIES STIFLE THE REPLIES FROM THE OTHERS THAT I WISH TO CONVERSE WITH.   When I wish to interact with you, I will quote you.  Otherwise, assume I do not wish to hear from you.

 

You butt in and claim you know everything and no one else knows the real story.  That may or may not be the case but when adults are conversing and they have repeatedly asked you to stay out of their conversation, please do so.  While not public, the board is designed to allow posters to interact and have discussions.  Stop taking over every discussion on this topic..

 

You love to give advice.  Try listening to some for a change.  Stop acting like a know-it-all.  Stop butting in, even when you think you know more.  Others should be allowed to converse without your interjections.   Stop harassing those that disagree with you.  Please take that advice to heart.  I think it could help you to become a better poster.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Here is another post I would like to keep for future reference  Hope this is the right spot for these.

 

 

DR, why can't you control yourself?  I have told you several times that discussions with you always seem to devolve into you, the crazy eyed guy at the bar, being way too close in my face screaming about lizard people!  Yet, here we are again. 

 

Over the last 4-5 pages in this thread you asked me the exact same question approximately 10 times.  I answered it at least 7 times, pointed out that I had already answered it repeatedly, gave you a link to more detail, and warned you to stop the repetition or you would go back on ignore.  That happened....go back and look if you doubt.  You then quickly asked the same question twice more and then got put on ignore.  You claim to be innocently just asking but when THE SAME QUESTION IS ASKED AND ANSWERED 10 TIMES YOU ARE HARASSING, NOT CONVERSING.  That is you being the crazy eyed guy at the bar AGAIN.  Recognize that please!

 

As I have told you, I would rather not engage with you.  I have literally begged you many times to stop replying to me unless you are quoted.  YOU WILL NOT ABIDE BY THAT VERY REASONABLE REQUEST.   That is a little twisted and certainly not right, imo.  I should be allowed to carry on conversations with other posters without you interjecting yourself but your butting in regularly takes over the conversation.  YOUR REPLIES STIFLE THE REPLIES FROM THE OTHERS THAT I WISH TO CONVERSE WITH.   When I wish to interact with you, I will quote you.  Otherwise, assume I do not wish to hear from you.

 

You butt in and claim you know everything and no one else knows the real story.  That may or may not be the case but when adults are conversing and they have repeatedly asked you to stay out of their conversation, please do so.  While not public, the board is designed to allow posters to interact and have discussions.  Stop taking over every discussion on this topic..

 

You love to give advice.  Try listening to some for a change.  Stop acting like a know-it-all.  Stop butting in, even when you think you know more.  Others should be allowed to converse without your interjections.   Stop harassing those that disagree with you.  Please take that advice to heart.  I think it could help you to become a better poster.

 

Again, this is the writings of a dishonest stoner, not a serious person. 

 

He’s been provided ample evidence and answers to questions he’s posed — and he ignored it because his feelings and emotions override his capacity for logic and reason. 

 

Bob thinks this is harassment. It’s not. It’s an education. If not for Bob — but for those who read his screed and my responses to it. 

 

Don’t be like Bob, an unhinged stoner who denies reality and evidence — be better than Bob. 

24 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm not blocked?  Why has your idiotic stoner ass not blocked me already?  

 

Because he’s not a smart person. He’s deeply ignorant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

 

My wife did that totally drunk a few years ago in a downtown Chicago parking ramp while we were walking to car after a lonnnggggg night out.  Glass doors leading to the elevator area.  Face planted right into pane before I could push door open for her.  Doink!  Very funny moment after it happened.  I don't think she remembered the next day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm not blocked?  Why has your idiotic stoner ass not blocked me already?  

 

Because he was going to, but then this Bob Marley song came on the radio.  And oh man, you know when you get the munchies for some Utz and what was he going to do?  Oh yeah, Call of Duty

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The next graphene? Shiny and magnetic, a new form of pure carbon dazzles with potential

 

 

ca_1115NID_Carbon_online.jpg?itok=kFPWgK

 

A “happy accident” has yielded a new, stable form of pure carbon made from cheap feedstocks, researchers say. Like diamond and graphene, two other guises of carbon, the material seems to have extraordinary physical properties. It is harder than stainless steel, about as conductive, and as reflective as a polished aluminum mirror. Perhaps most surprising, the substance appears to be ferromagnetic, behaving like a permanent magnet at temperatures up to 125°C—a first for carbon. The discovery, announced by physicist Joel Therrien of the University of Massachusetts in Lowell on 4 November here at the International Symposium on Clusters and Nanomaterials, could lead to lightweight coatings, medical products, and novel electronic devices. ...

 

... Therrien says the discovery came in a failed attempt to synthesize pentagraphene, a sheet of carbon atoms bound in pentagonal rings that has been predicted but never created. His idea was to exploit a technique known as “geometrical frustration.” He placed a catalyst, a sheet of copper foil, on a pedestal in the center of a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) oven and heated it to about 800°C. But rather than pumping in a feed gas of the usual small hydrocarbons, such as methane, he injected a more complex precursor: 2,2 dimethylbutane, a cheap petrochemical that is available by the ton. As a branched hexane, the chemical has six carbon atoms arranged along a bent backbone. ...

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...