YoloinOhio Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 (edited) I have so many thoughts on this Edited December 6, 2017 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steptide Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 What's the cfb's policy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, Steptide said: What's the cfb's policy? Thrown out and suspended for....1 game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, Steptide said: What's the cfb's policy? Helmet to helmet hit = targeting. If called for targeting, immediately reviewed. If upheld, ejected for rest of game. If ejected in 1st half, can return next game. If ejected in 2nd half, suspended for 1st half of next game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 30 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: Thrown out and suspended for....1 game That’s just targeting. Non-football acts would obviously be a longer suspension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Doc said: That’s just targeting. Non-football acts would obviously be a longer suspension. Yep just to confirm these are two separate rule changes/ considerations. One is to adopt cfb targeting policy, another is to create a “Gronk”category (I hope they name it that) so that punishments for non-football hits are addressed separately. Edited December 6, 2017 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Doc said: That’s just targeting. Non-football acts would obviously be a longer suspension. I was answering the poster's question as to what the CFB policy is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 16 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: I was answering the poster's question as to what the CFB policy is. Isn't it only a suspension if it happens in the 2nd half? Or did that change? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 16 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Isn't it only a suspension if it happens in the 2nd half? Or did that change? If it happens in 2nd half, they are suspended for 1st half of next game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 45 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: I was answering the poster's question as to what the CFB policy is. Gotcha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heitz Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 hours ago, Steptide said: What's the cfb's policy? A fight to death in the middle of the field to prove who's not a kitty. In the last game I watched, I think Brick killed a guy... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 hours ago, YoloinOhio said: Yep just to confirm these are two separate rule changes/ considerations. One is to adopt cfb targeting policy, another is to create a “Gronk”category (I hope they name it that) so that punishments for non-football hits are addressed separately. ...yup, adoption makes sense...if player safety is a goal so be it...if not, safety is a fallacy and that can is kicked down the road until something serious happens....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donszar Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 The only way to stop the NFL players from using their heads as weapons is to remove the helmets from the game. Without the protection they'll stop after one or two hits. Think Aussie rules football or Rugby. NFL players have too much body armor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transient Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 3 hours ago, Heitz said: A fight to death in the middle of the field to prove who's not a kitty. In the last game I watched, I think Brick killed a guy... No commercials, NO MERCY!!! Como estan, bitches! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 10 hours ago, Steptide said: What's the cfb's policy? They randomly throw guys out of the game if they tackle someone too hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 5 hours ago, Donszar said: The only way to stop the NFL players from using their heads as weapons is to remove the helmets from the game. Without the protection they'll stop after one or two hits. Think Aussie rules football or Rugby. NFL players have too much body armor. Thought! (My head hurts) What if they moved preseason to this as a precursor to eventually going that direction. I agree, the helmet especially is currently a weapon not a protector. Curious what the data on brain injury suggests from the leather days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turk71 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Mango said: Thought! (My head hurts) What if they moved preseason to this as a precursor to eventually going that direction. I agree, the helmet especially is currently a weapon not a protector. Curious what the data on brain injury suggests from the leather days. They have data on brain injuries from the leatherhead days? You are joking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 (edited) Give the opposing team 8 points, clear, no 2pt. PAT... It will stop pretty damn quickly! 2 hours ago, Mango said: Thought! (My head hurts) What if they moved preseason to this as a precursor to eventually going that direction. I agree, the helmet especially is currently a weapon not a protector. Curious what the data on brain injury suggests from the leather days. Leather helmets protect slightly better from straight impact... Check the study. But where leather adds in cushion, it is a total fail when it comes to getting mamed/facially disfigured. How does it hold a facemask. 8 hours ago, Donszar said: The only way to stop the NFL players from using their heads as weapons is to remove the helmets from the game. Without the protection they'll stop after one or two hits. Think Aussie rules football or Rugby. NFL players have too much body armor. Or just take facemasks off. Edited December 7, 2017 by ExiledInIllinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris66 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 No more reviews. Let the nfl handle it with fines on Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts