Jump to content

Any interest in Steelers' WRs? Coates? Hunter? Heyward-Bey?


Recommended Posts

Steelers have arguably the strongest receiving corps in the NFL. They definitely have to cut at least one of Justin Hunter, Sammie Coates or Darrius Heyward-Bey. Do we have any interest in any one of them?

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/sammiecoates/2552470/profile

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/darriusheyward-bey/80427/profile

 

We already know about Justin Hunter. Some familiarity with Tyrod.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that they will pick up a WR if they deem necessary with cuts that are coming since I highly doubt we give up any of our draft picks for another WR.

Wondering if they'll put him through waivers or just outright cut him. If the latter I would think he'd be a fit for McBeane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that they will pick up a WR if they deem necessary with cuts that are coming since I highly doubt we give up any of our draft picks for another WR.

I definitley think they pick up another WR, they already found a need for adding one that they went out and brought in Boldin, now with him retiring I think they make a move for someone.

 

I don't think they worry about having to use a pick in order to get the right one, because i believe the plan all along is to accumulate picks to make the moves that will help rebuild this team. I don't think they are all being stockpiled to make a move for a QB, and with the amount they have, they could spare one and get someone that may be a bit younger, or better then someone elses cut. I doubt they use a pick to get an older vet on a short term deal though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steelers have arguably the strongest receiving corps in the NFL. They definitely have to cut at least one of Justin Hunter, Sammie Coates or Darrius Heyward-Bey. Do we have any interest in any one of them?

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/sammiecoates/2552470/profile

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/darriusheyward-bey/80427/profile

 

We already know about Justin Hunter. Some familiarity with Tyrod.

 

I'd bring Hunter back for his red zone skills. Is Heyward Bey still fast? Coates is ok, probably better than what we have after WR #3 or #4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitley think they pick up another WR, they already found a need for adding one that they went out and brought in Boldin, now with him retiring I think they make a move for someone.

 

I don't think they worry about having to use a pick in order to get the right one, because i believe the plan all along is to accumulate picks to make the moves that will help rebuild this team. I don't think they are all being stockpiled to make a move for a QB, and with the amount they have, they could spare one and get someone that may be a bit younger, or better then someone elses cut. I doubt they use a pick to get an older vet on a short term deal though.

 

Why would we give up a pick for a WR if we can get them for nothing when they get cut? The reason why draft picks are so valuable is that you get that player for 4 years for less money with the option of a 5th year, so dumping a pick on a guy like Phillip Dorsett because he is fast seems like a bad idea imo, he has 2 years left on his contract and can't even make the starting roster with Andrew Luck at QB, that should tell you something about the player, Same goes for most of these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wondering if they'll put him through waivers or just outright cut him. If the latter I would think he'd be a fit for McBeane.

Waivers vs cut is a misnomer. If a player has less than 3 years he is "Waived" and subject to waiver conditions, If a player has 4 or more years there is no such thing as a waiver , because he becomes a free agent immediately. It's not a team decision . You cut the player and based on years it is then determined if he has a waiver restriction or is immediately a free agent. At least that's my understanding of the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waivers vs cut is a misnomer. If a player has less than 3 years he is "Waived" and subject to waiver conditions, If a player has 4 or more years there is no such thing as a waiver , because he becomes a free agent immediately. It's not a team decision . You cut the player and based on years it is then determined if he has a waiver restriction or is immediately a free agent. At least that's my understanding of the rules.

My understanding as well.

 

All has to do with tenure. You "cut" them, and they either hit waivers or don't depending on it.

 

Some more info per PFT on the difference, and vested veteran rules as well:

 

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/08/30/vested-veterans-wholl-be-cut-will-get-to-pick-their-next-team/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...