JM2009 Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 typical whining by some, crying the same 17 years this, 17 years that. don't look at it as a positive, instead knock it and say they all do it, big deal. this place sure has it's debbie downers that always seem to find a thread they can try and derail. thanks for sharing OP. I get nothing but positive from it and hope they reap the rewards going forward. oh, yeah, I have a pair of rose colored glasses that I just cleaned the lenses as well as added an extra 1/2 cup of sugar to my kool aide, so I'm good to go... Taylor is committed to the team and isn't a troublemaker. A quiet guy. The best QB we have had this century. He is far from terrible. I have found the ignore feature works quite well...and if they bring in Boldin, that will only add to the offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince88 Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Regardless of all of the remarks here about the two, I'm glad they are putting in that work to get ready. They don't have to do this. They could be on a beach somewhere sipping on something cold until they have to report. Instead they are working together to build that chemistry and get on the same page. THIS!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 I meant it was a good sign for his foot. Sheesh. Ah- our bad. Next time, might be good to mention the foot or focus on the Sammy aspect somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyBills Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 (edited) Wait, Sammy can run without his foot falling off?? But but, Willie Colon just said on National TV ,that he thinks the foot will cause him to be done with football in 2 years, at 26 years old!! Lol, what a joke these NFL news anchors and writers have become. Zero integrity. That's an awesome picture. Sammy looks great, Taylor is doing whateverhe can to get better , gain chemistry with his #1 WR. He's only going on his 30th start, I don't see why he can't make the jump to above average in the passing game and maintain being elite in the running game. Always felt he had that "it" factor Edited July 22, 2017 by JerseyBills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Ah- our bad. Next time, might be good to mention the foot or focus on the Sammy aspect somehow. Why, it was obvious. Don't blame him for your failure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not at the table Karlos Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Whose the $&@hole in the sea mammals shirt? mitch matthews. Any idea who the two guys on the outside are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Taylor, JP, Bledsoe, Trent, EJ is/were committed to the team and isn't a troublemaker. A quiet guy. .and if they bring in Boldin, that will only add to the offense. Being committed, quiet and not a troublemaker makes someone a good guy; not a good QB. What, exactly, would Boldin add other than depth and leadership (which I think are very important and is why, if cheap, I'd welcome the Boldin addition). I just don't see how he'd make the on-field offense better, to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 "Hope these homies run a train on this Tannehill wanna be, white boy." ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnBonhamRocks Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Being committed, quiet and not a troublemaker makes someone a good guy; not a good QB. What, exactly, would Boldin add other than depth and leadership (which I think are very important and is why, if cheap, I'd welcome the Boldin addition). I just don't see how he'd make the on-field offense better, to be honest. 8 TDs last year was cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 (edited) Being committed, quiet and not a troublemaker makes someone a good guy; not a good QB. What, exactly, would Boldin add other than depth and leadership (which I think are very important and is why, if cheap, I'd welcome the Boldin addition). I just don't see how he'd make the on-field offense better, to be honest. so for cheap, just bring him in for depth and leadership? why? I seriously doubt they would bring him in just to collect a check if he were not able to contribute and help to make the on-field offense any better? I know, the offense will suck as long as TT is at the helm so no need to bring in any wr at this point when the on-field offense will be no better, with or without one of any caliber. (not saying you said that, just the census of some around this joint seem to believe that) Edited July 22, 2017 by DaBillsFanSince1973 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Murica Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 so for cheap, just bring him in for depth and leadership? why? I seriously doubt they would bring him in just to collect a check if he were not able to contribute and help to make the on-field offense any better? I know, the offense will suck as long as TT is at the helm so no need to bring in any wr at this point when the on-field offense will be no better, with or without one of any caliber. (not saying you said that, just the census of some around this joint seem to believe that) How is a top 10 scoring offense considered on the level of "suck"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 I meant it was a good sign for his foot. Sheesh. ....Saturday morning crowd is pretty tough................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 How is a top 10 scoring offense considered on the level of "suck"? you asking me? ask those that think that. plenty of them here to give you your answer. as for my post, sarcasm was a plenty but must of whizzed right over your head...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Murica Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 you asking me? ask those that think that. plenty of them here to give you your answer. as for my post, sarcasm was a plenty but must of whizzed right over your head...? Man, who pissed in your cereal bowl? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 so for cheap, just bring him in for depth and leadership? why? I seriously doubt they would bring him in just to collect a check if he were not able to contribute and help to make the on-field offense any better? I know, the offense will suck as long as TT is at the helm so no need to bring in any wr at this point when the on-field offense will be no better, with or without one of any caliber. (not saying you said that, just the census of some around this joint seem to believe that) Well, in theory, even depth makes the on field product better, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 It's always good to see but as others have pointed, they all do this. Only difference is Johnny Unitas didn't post his workouts with John Mackey on instagram. Get off my lawn!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 (edited) Well, in theory, even depth makes the on field product better, no? never said it would or would not. but agree that it would. depth is a good thing. leadership is a good thing. Boldin would bring that as well as contribute to the on-field offense, also a good thing, no? I was basing my post, sarcastically, to this post here, so you tell me? Being committed, quiet and not a troublemaker makes someone a good guy; not a good QB. What, exactly, would Boldin add other than depth and leadership (which I think are very important and is why, if cheap, I'd welcome the Boldin addition). I just don't see how he'd make the on-field offense better, to be honest. Edited July 22, 2017 by DaBillsFanSince1973 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 never said it would or would not. but agree that it would. depth is a good thing. leadership is a good thing. Boldin would bring that as well as contribute to the on-field offense, also a good thing, no? I was basing my post, sarcastically, to this post here, so you tell me? I saw how it went, just quoted you as the last post With 2-5 kind of wild cards, I wouldn't mind some sort of reliable floor to be set. I don't think he's going to contribute a ton but could be in the Tolbert role of reliable in the right packages and intensity setter If the price is right I'm good with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 If Sammy can stay healthy this season- the Bills will make the playoffs IMO. Sammy has Julio Jones like potential to just take over games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 How is a top 10 scoring offense considered on the level of "suck"? Good question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts