Jump to content

Maclin or Decker? (If you could choose)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Who has the least amount of trips to the locker room with an injury? None of them are worth a damn if always hurt. I'd like either but I'd probably go with Decker though I like Maclin's potential in the offense especially if Sammy goes out. Decker is the ideal #2 where Maclin when healthy is a #1. Outside of his shoulder Decker is dependable. Maclin has knee issues. In McD I trust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maclin. Just seems like a great fit. Could really help this offense take the next step.

 

When's the last time we had a solid WR1-3 anyways? With Moulds and Price/Evans, our WR3 was Josh Reed.


If he goes to the Ravens or will be Flacco. I'd say at this point it's likely that it will be Tyrod or Flacco?

Really hope the Ravens don't ask if he would rather catch passes from the starter or backup that won it all in 2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'd rather that than Decker as well. I don't think Decker is a real difference maker. Maclin is though - he makes this offense so much more dangerous he might push you into playoff contention.

The receivers were open last year as was the TE. It's a rigged system in the NFL to allow Offenses to flourish by skewing the rules to allow WRs to get open. The young and new guys we have now will also be open in the Fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maclin over Decker. The real question is Maclin or Barnidge imo. Considering our system, If we plan on running lots of 2 TE sets to help disguise the run/pass I think Barnidge might be the best fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The receivers were open last year as was the TE. It's a rigged system in the NFL to allow Offenses to flourish by skewing the rules to allow WRs to get open. The young and new guys we have now will also be open in the Fall.

 

Oh I have been the biggest drum banger when it comes to the fact our guys were open a lot last year and the QB didn't throw them the ball. But they have stuck with Tyrod and on the reduced deal that is a sensible move - so you put the best guys you can around him. Mac on a 1 year deal, Sammy on the last year of his rookie deal.... and if the QB can't get it done with a #1 and #1A it should accelerate the decision to move on. Set Tyrod up to succeed and then it is on him to do so. Unlike others who want a longer deal I only want Mac on a 1 year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans are still in win npw mode. What guys can get us into the playoffs now, but the FO isnt thinking that way.

 

They want to break it down, build their team then be competitive year in and year out.

 

At this point, I doubt we sign any of them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans are still in win npw mode. What guys can get us into the playoffs now, but the FO isnt thinking that way.

 

They want to break it down, build their team then be competitive year in and year out.

 

At this point, I doubt we sign any of them

Why would you believe that? Nothing supports your theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans are still in win npw mode. What guys can get us into the playoffs now, but the FO isnt thinking that way.

 

They want to break it down, build their team then be competitive year in and year out.

 

At this point, I doubt we sign any of them

Um, no

 

They haven't shown that at all. They brought in Hodges on a 1 year. They brought back Tyrod. They are chasing Maclin and Barnidge on short-term deals. You don't add guys if you are trying to break it down. The actions of the Jets show a team breaking it down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...