BuffAlone Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 I think most of the jurors, now, realize he did it.I dont Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gomper Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 No, not me. I'm not annoyed, but I feel very sorry for him because he not only lost a child, he lost much of his life after the murder obsessing about trying to get justice. I'd rather he move on and have some peace. I don't know the guy, so maybe he's done just that, but all you ever hear is him trying to get justice/revenge. Agreed, he can't bring his son back. Really? If that ever happens to you come back and tell us you're singing the same tune. F OJ. I'm sure it won't be long until he does something else illegal. The women of Florida should leave the state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Really? If that ever happens to you come back and tell us you're singing the same tune. F OJ. I'm sure it won't be long until he does something else illegal. The women of Florida should leave the state. Maybe I wasn't clear. I'm with you on "F OJ" and all that. I just hope Mr Goldman doesn't waste the rest of his life focused on the (justifiable) hatred. Living on only hatred is not much of a life, I'd bet. Let your lawyers harass the hell out of OJ until the end of time. I'm not saying how I would react, and I certainly hope to never find out. I'm sure I'd hate forever, but hope I wouldn't obsess to the point it was the only focus in my life. My family wouldn't want that. I just hope Mr Goldman can find some peace. Otherwise, OJ has stolen even more lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gomper Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Maybe I wasn't clear. I'm with you on "F OJ" and all that. I just hope Mr Goldman doesn't waste the rest of his life focused on the (justifiable) hatred. Living on only hatred is not much of a life, I'd bet. Let your lawyers harass the hell out of OJ until the end of time. I'm not saying how I would react, and I certainly hope to never find out. I'm sure I'd hate forever, but hope I wouldn't obsess to the point it was the only focus in my life. My family wouldn't want that. I just hope Mr Goldman can find some peace. Otherwise, OJ has stolen even more lives. Fair enough. I hear you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffAlone Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Maybe I wasn't clear. I'm with you on "F OJ" and all that. I just hope Mr Goldman doesn't waste the rest of his life focused on the (justifiable) hatred. Living on only hatred is not much of a life, I'd bet. Let your lawyers harass the hell out of OJ until the end of time. I'm not saying how I would react, and I certainly hope to never find out. I'm sure I'd hate forever, but hope I wouldn't obsess to the point it was the only focus in my life. My family wouldn't want that. I just hope Mr Goldman can find some peace. Otherwise, OJ has stolen even more lives.How is it justifiable? What if? Just what if he IS innocent? He has been crucified for years.and his family has suffered too. I realize the Goldman family has suffered too, but what if?? I dont think he committed that horrific crime. Illuminati. Investigate the "evidence" yourself. Watch for every lawyer and judge, to make a hand gesture.like a triangle(womb)....cops on the scene too. Politicians...obama, etc. Strange brew they feed us.oh, and the earth is flat btw😄 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 How is it justifiable? What if? Just what if he IS innocent? He has been crucified for years.and his family has suffered too. I realize the Goldman family has suffered too, but what if?? I dont think he committed that horrific crime. Illuminati. Investigate the "evidence" yourself. Watch for every lawyer and judge, to make a hand gesture.like a triangle(womb)....cops on the scene too. Politicians...obama, etc. Strange brew they feed us.oh, and the earth is flat btw The overwhelming DNA evidence, the shoes, the fact that not one piece of evidence has surfaced after all these years pointing to someone else-the guy beat his wife in jealous rages before. He has a horrible temper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Jack Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Juice will get an invite to the Hall of Fame ceremonies when released, not this year though. It's not that big of a deal.... Contacted Friday about the possibility of Simpson attending the yearly event, Hall of Fame officials said, 'All Hall of Famers are invited to attend the annual enshrinement' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 How is it justifiable? What if? Just what if he IS innocent? He has been crucified for years.and his family has suffered too. I realize the Goldman family has suffered too, but what if?? I dont think he committed that horrific crime. Illuminati. Investigate the "evidence" yourself. Watch for every lawyer and judge, to make a hand gesture.like a triangle(womb)....cops on the scene too. Politicians...obama, etc. Strange brew they feed us.oh, and the earth is flat btw Maybe natural is a better word than justifiable. But even if the son did do it, OJ was there and somehow was involved in the cover up. So....I think justifiable works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 We can probably all agree some of OJ's property was there so Simpson may have been trying to resolve the problem without getting the police involved so his so called friends didn't get busted in the process. and it backfired.... And it wasn't all his own stuff. Much of it was memorabilia that was legitimately owned by the collectors. There were personal items that belonged to OJ but it was the minority of what was there. That being said I always though the sentence was absolutely ridiculous. It didn't match the circumstances of the crime at all. I will continue to believe he was sentenced for what happened in 1994 not for the reality of the circumstances around the armed robbery. Mostly, I agree with you here. But, while I can't speak with authority, I recall reading/learning that Nevada has unusually stringent penalties for armed robbery, which is already very stringent everywhere. He associated with idiots because he was a pariah and they were willing to help him get his items back although with his background it would be better to pursue it legally. They carried guns and he did not but he was given the sentence after pleas of others where they got no jail time and prosecutor got a high profile case. And Nevada should have stringent laws with all of the casinos and brothels with a lot of cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 http://www.cbsnews.com/news/o-j-simpson-protective-custody-parole-prison-attorney-malcolm-lavergne/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab5i&linkId=40136403 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 I think most of the jurors, now, realize he did it. Most of them didn't really care, they just wanted to go home. And at least a couple wanted payback for Rodney King (and decades of other outrages). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Most of them didn't really care, they just wanted to go home. And at least a couple wanted payback for Rodney King (and decades of other outrages). You're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nero1 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 I am not sure how many on this board even watched the trial, but OJ was found not guilty because the LA Police and prosecutors office were totally inept. Had they taken the time to gather the evidence and properly prepare a case before arresting OJ, then they would not have been caught off guard by Simpson's attorneys demanding an immediate trial, to begin in 30 days, which is a law on the books pertaining to criminal cases. They were completely unprepared. they also were shown to have mishandled the evidence they had. Blood samples taken from OJ were not properly catalogued. Did they get two viles or three? they weren't quite sure. Why was blood found in conspicuous places, without droplets leading to them? And finally, the glove. Mishandling by freezing and defrosting is said to have had a shrinking effect. Then having OJ try to put them on over synthetic (ie surgical type) gloves was a ludicrous attempt at grandstanding. the evidence appeared to be overwhelming, but misused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4th&long Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Oj is a piece of garbage! His name should come down of the wall. It's a shame that someone who almost decapitated 2 people is on the wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 I am not sure how many on this board even watched the trial, but OJ was found not guilty because the LA Police and prosecutors office were totally inept. Had they taken the time to gather the evidence and properly prepare a case before arresting OJ, then they would not have been caught off guard by Simpson's attorneys demanding an immediate trial, to begin in 30 days, which is a law on the books pertaining to criminal cases. They were completely unprepared. they also were shown to have mishandled the evidence they had. Blood samples taken from OJ were not properly catalogued. Did they get two viles or three? they weren't quite sure. Why was blood found in conspicuous places, without droplets leading to them? And finally, the glove. Mishandling by freezing and defrosting is said to have had a shrinking effect. Then having OJ try to put them on over synthetic (ie surgical type) gloves was a ludicrous attempt at grandstanding. the evidence appeared to be overwhelming, but misused. Revisionist history. DNA was still in its infancy in '93 and the nation had yet to buy into its undeniable effectiveness. Were they sloppy in gathering the evidence? By today's standards, yes. Were there blunders by the Prosecution? So many, I lost count. Should the DA's office have assigned their top criminal prosecutors to the case to combat the greatest Defense council ever formed? Yes, even if it meant bringing someone out of retirement. Did OJ stop taking his arthritis meds so his hands would swell in anticipation of Darden's challenge to try on the gloves? Post trial evidence states as much. Did OJ Simpson kill Nicole and Ron? I doubt I'll ever be persuaded to believe he didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroutDog Posted July 25, 2017 Author Share Posted July 25, 2017 With all of the issues with how the case was handled, the full truth will never be known, in my opinion. Having watched the trial, the one thing that left me scratching my head was the prosecution stating that Goldman 'fought relentlessly for his life'. They said both his hands were bruised from throwing so many punches (that clearly landed). If that is the case, how would OJ have not had a single bruise? It is because of that that I believe he was responsible but did not commit the crime. I can't get my mind past that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Is it going to be a "cool" thing to golf with OJ when he gets out? Will celebrities embrace him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronxbomber21 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Its $25,000 a month CBF wow 25,000 on the books a month, he must have had a lot of friends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 wow 25,000 on the books a month, he must have had a lot of friends It just the amount of his NFL pension. CBF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 With all of the issues with how the case was handled, the full truth will never be known, in my opinion. Having watched the trial, the one thing that left me scratching my head was the prosecution stating that Goldman 'fought relentlessly for his life'. They said both his hands were bruised from throwing so many punches (that clearly landed). If that is the case, how would OJ have not had a single bruise? It is because of that that I believe he was responsible but did not commit the crime. I can't get my mind past that. Juice was cut real bad on his hand, bled profusely for quite awhile in various locations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts