Benjamin Franklin Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 If Comey is a witness, then Mueller should step down. They're best buddies. Comey was Muller's protege. Furthermore, Muller added four people to his staff that have a history of making significant donations to the Democrat party. Michael Dreeban, Andrew Weissman, James Quarles, and Janie Rhee. Conflict of interest. Rhee was a lawyer for the Clinton Foundation. Donations are conflicts? Thanks for Rush's talking points today. Mueller has been lauded by both sides. He's fine and he will find that Trump acted inappropriately. As he did. Trump tried to shut down an ongoing investigation. That hurts and Ryan's "he's just a newbie" excuse doesn't save the bacon. Trump is getting off with the Hillary wrist slap. It's how the process will play out. Don't you see that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 (edited) Trump is considering firing special counsel Mueller ...Christopher Ruddy said the president may want to fire the special counsel investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. The Trump way. Fire all the people who argue against you? Isn't that obstruction? Edited June 13, 2017 by ShadyBillsFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Trump is considering firing special counsel Mueller ... Christopher Ruddy said the president may want to fire the special counsel investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. The Trump way. Fire all the people who argue against you? Isn't that obstruction? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 The President is the sole executive power and can do what he wants. He can hire and fire at will. If it is too egregious then a loyal and useful opposition can argue it's unjust, and it may add to a bonfire like it did for Nixon firing Archibald Cox. Alan Dershowitz stated this the last few months but nobody is listening. And the opposition are a bunch of diaper-pooping whiny babies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 The President is the sole executive power and can do what he wants. He can hire and fire at will. If it is too egregious then a loyal and useful opposition can argue it's unjust, and it may add to a bonfire like it did for Nixon firing Archibald Cox. Alan Dershowitz stated this the last few months but nobody is listening. And the opposition are a bunch of diaper-pooping whiny babies. but this is no Watergate. This is nothing of the sort. If trump is removed from office than our political system and every twat out there who supports removing a president because of feelings should be an hero to us all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 (edited) The President is the sole executive power and can do what he wants. He can hire and fire at will. If it is too egregious then a loyal and useful opposition can argue it's unjust, and it may add to a bonfire like it did for Nixon firing Archibald Cox. Alan Dershowitz stated this the last few months but nobody is listening. And the opposition are a bunch of diaper-pooping whiny babies. What do you think the furor is if not lighting a bonfire? The agenda is not all about losing though that makes for bitter soundbytes. It's about winning in 2018 and 2020. For me, it's about getting a president who isn't a tots embarrassment and fixing a two party system that refuses to work together. Hell, the Rs can't even work together let alone the Rs and Ds. Still we elect incumbants every year. Edited June 13, 2017 by Benjamin Franklin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Watergate, in a simplest form. 1) 6 or so are caught breaking into DNC HQ, among them a former CIA biggie 2) The judges make it known sentencing will be for decades, not weeks. 3) Hush $$$ is paid to the defendants 4) A lot of pompous nonsense goes on for months until Butterfield under oath states that Nixon taped everything in his office 5) Nixon cannot get the courts to agree holding the tapes is of national interest. He also fires the special prosecutor. 6) When a large gap appears in the tapes (18 minutes or so) it is when Nixon would have been informed of the breakin and the hush money. 7) The GOP tells Nixon he has to go, and he resigns and is pardoned by Ford. You don't even have .01% of anything currently.... Nothing was proven fully, it can be argued that Nixon ordered the break-in (probably unlikely) but it makes sense (still never proven) that he was aware and consented to the cover-up. What do you think the furor is if not lighting a bonfire? The agenda is not all about losing though that makes for bitter soundbytes. It's about winning in 2018 and 2020.For me, it's about getting a president who isn't a tots embarrassment and fixing a two party system that refuses to work together. Hell, the Rs can't even work together let alone the Rs and Ds.Still we elect incumbants every year. winning in 2018 and 2020 is a ho-hum dog bites man story. what i've described above is about as rotten as anything that has come to light in US history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Watergate, in a simplest form. 1) 6 or so are caught breaking into DNC HQ, among them a former CIA biggie 2) The judges make it known sentencing will be for decades, not weeks. 3) Hush $$$ is paid to the defendants 4) A lot of pompous nonsense goes on for months until Butterfield under oath states that Nixon taped everything in his office 5) Nixon cannot get the courts to agree holding the tapes is of national interest. He also fires the special prosecutor. 6) When a large gap appears in the tapes (18 minutes or so) it is when Nixon would have been informed of the breakin and the hush money. 7) The GOP tells Nixon he has to go, and he resigns and is pardoned by Ford. You don't even have .01% of anything currently.... Nothing was proven fully, it can be argued that Nixon ordered the break-in (probably unlikely) but it makes sense (still never proven) that he was aware and consented to the cover-up. You forgot that Nixon ordered CIA to tell FBI to stop investigation when the money trail was leading too close to the WH. Now we don't know where the money trail leads, but that's being looked at and Trump is obviously nervous. He's also nervous about Flynn. If Trump is tied to/compromised/being black mailed/ or is an agent of Russia, then this is ten times worse than Watergate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Firing the head of the FBI because you don't like his investigation into your inner circle is not a rose garden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Firing the head of the FBI because you don't like his investigation into your inner circle is not a rose garden. Yup. But that's the right of the President. Consequences may arise from this action. It's best that one should fire everyone from a prior Admin, that's part and parcel of a new Admin. See the wonderful lessons libs are getting that they should have learned by Grade 5. The Electoral College, the Powers of the President, how the actual process of impeachment may proceed (they are still sketchy on this one.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted June 13, 2017 Author Share Posted June 13, 2017 @CBSNews I will not follow any order "unless I believe those are lawful & appropriate orders," Rosenstein says on if POTUS orders him to fire Mueller https://twitter.com/i/videos/tweet/874639083829702659 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 (edited) @CBSNews I will not follow any order "unless I believe those are lawful & appropriate orders," Rosenstein says on if POTUS orders him to fire Mueller https://twitter.com/i/videos/tweet/874639083829702659 DR can't type for all the blood rushing to his nether regions. Edited June 13, 2017 by Benjamin Franklin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Trump is considering firing special counsel Mueller ... Christopher Ruddy said the president may want to fire the special counsel investigating possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. The Trump way. Fire all the people who argue against you? Isn't that obstruction? Yes. The rules in private sector are different than public sector. It's where all this private sector guys get mired into scandal when they hit the public sector thinking they can run it "like a business." Blago comes quickly to mind. Trumpster of course is smoother than that burlap bag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Blago was convicted of an interesting assortment of matters and sentence to 14 years. Pretending this has anything to do with Trump is well off any form of rational talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Firing the head of the FBI because you don't like his investigation into your inner circle is not a rose garden. @CBSNews I will not follow any order "unless I believe those are lawful & appropriate orders," Rosenstein says on if POTUS orders him to fire Mueller https://twitter.com/i/videos/tweet/874639083829702659 And who is more deep state than the heads of the FBM and the Justice Department? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 MUELLER? ANYONE? MUELLER? Liz Sheld has the latest on Bob Mueller, rapid FOIA responses, and more. Paul Mirengoff: Should Trump fire Mueller, Part Two Robert Mueller Stocks Staff with Democrat Donors: Special counsel’s team includes former Clinton Foundation lawyer, contributors to Obama, Hillary, more. THE HILL: Four members of Mueller’s team have donated to Democrats. Mueller’s hopelessly compromised. Nothing he does is going to be accepted as fair or impartial. He should step down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 MUELLER? ANYONE? MUELLER? Liz Sheld has the latest on Bob Mueller, rapid FOIA responses, and more. Paul Mirengoff: Should Trump fire Mueller, Part Two Robert Mueller Stocks Staff with Democrat Donors: Special counsel’s team includes former Clinton Foundation lawyer, contributors to Obama, Hillary, more. THE HILL: Four members of Mueller’s team have donated to Democrats. Mueller’s hopelessly compromised. Nothing he does is going to be accepted as fair or impartial. He should step down. B-Man has his marching orders!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 when a problem comes along, you must whip it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 when a problem comes along, you must whip it. Most definitely! Whip it. Whip it good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 solid do they still have the video of the 7 years olds doing this for school art project? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts